[Bug 450260] Re: grub-probe fails with btrfs root (and ext3 /boot)

I'm running Lucid, and update-grub still fails in the same way. Adding GRUB_DEVICE in /etc/default/grub is not enough, you also need the "|| true" patch, because the script (grub-mkconfig) always tests for root, before it even loads /etc/default/grub. For me an acceptable fix would be that if GRU

[Bug 544533] Re: prism54 driver doesn´t work with lucid lynx beta1

Ah, of course. Silly me. Install linux-firmware-nonfree and everything will work as expected. -- prism54 driver doesn´t work with lucid lynx beta1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/544533 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 544533] Re: prism54 driver doesn´t work with lucid lynx beta1

Copied /lib/firmware/isl3886 from Jaunty into Lucid's /lib/firmware/, and now it works. Why did this file disappear from the linux-firmware package and where would be the sanctioned way to get it in Lucid? -- prism54 driver doesn´t work with lucid lynx beta1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/544533

[Bug 450260] Re: grub-probe fails with btrfs root (and ext3 /boot)

This is more serious than it seems, not simply a matter of convenience. Packages like desktop-base, which runs update-grub in postinst, fail to install properly when running on a btrfs root. -- grub-probe fails with btrfs root (and ext3 /boot) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/450260 You received t

[Bug 189953] Re: Inconsistent 'Provides' for different java compilers/runtimes

I was just playing devil's advocate with myself and trying to understand why one would want to depend on a package or meta-package instead of a virtual dependency. And it certainly is the case that different implementations differ in how well the implement the APIs and how much they implement. For

[Bug 189953] Re: Inconsistent 'Provides' for different java compilers/runtimes

Is that ideal? Depending on a 'Provides:' seems more flexible that depending on a meta-package. And the meta-package in question brings in different jdk's on different platforms, so it doesn't really make builds more predictable either. Anyway, I should probably take this to the relevant mailing li

[Bug 189953] Re: Inconsistent 'Provides' for different java compilers/runtimes

s,depends,build-depends, -- Inconsistent 'Provides' for different java compilers/runtimes https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/189953 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com ht

[Bug 189953] Re: Inconsistent 'Provides' for different java compilers/runtimes

Ok, better example: apt-get build-dep would likely bring in java-compiler och java2-compiler, which would not be satisfied by an already installed openjdk-6-jdk. The reason I mentioned default-jdk-builddep is because the jython package depends on it. The name led me to believe that it was a meta-

[Bug 189953] Re: Inconsistent 'Provides' for different java compilers/runtimes

s,och,and/or, -- Inconsistent 'Provides' for different java compilers/runtimes https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/189953 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists

[Bug 189953] Re: Inconsistent 'Provides' for different java compilers/runtimes

This is still a problem in openjdk-6 6b18~pre1-1ubuntu1. Installing default-jdk-builddep forces a gcj install even though openjdk-6-jdk is already installed. -- Inconsistent 'Provides' for different java compilers/runtimes https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/189953 You received this bug notification

[Bug 455655] Re: Cannot modprobe p54common: sysfs: duplicate filename 'ieee80211' can not be created

Problem fixed. The package linux-backports-modules-2.6.28-15-generic was installed, containing the lbm_cw_cfg80211 module. Removing the packaged removed the conflict. I still don't understand why that module was loaded, though. Did depmod find symbols in lbm_cw_cfg80211 that p54pci needed, and wh

[Bug 455655] Re: Cannot modprobe p54common: sysfs: duplicate filename 'ieee80211' can not be created

Hm. I double-clicked the saved report, but it seems apport-gtk decided to gather new information anyway. The above information is about working 2.6.27-15 linux, not the 2.6.28-15 which has the error. -- Cannot modprobe p54common: sysfs: duplicate filename 'ieee80211' can not be created https://b

[Bug 455655] Re: Cannot modprobe p54common: sysfs: duplicate filename 'ieee80211' can not be created

The text in the bug description is the relevant part of the valid dmesg. Attaching the original .apport file. ** Attachment added: "The original, valid, .apport file." http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33968973/apport.linux-image-2.6.28-15-generic_2.6.28-15.52.d07Jlx.apport -- Cannot modprobe p5

[Bug 455655] Re: Cannot modprobe p54common: sysfs: duplicate filename 'ieee80211' can not be created

The text in the bug description is the relevant part of the valid dmesg. Attaching the original .apport file. -- Cannot modprobe p54common: sysfs: duplicate filename 'ieee80211' can not be created https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/455655 You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Bug 455655] Re: Cannot modprobe p54common: sysfs: duplicate filename 'ieee80211' can not be created

** Attachment added: "BootDmesg.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33968752/BootDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: "CurrentDmesg.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33968753/CurrentDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33968754/Dependencies.txt ** A

[Bug 455655] [NEW] Cannot modprobe p54common: sysfs: duplicate filename 'ieee80211' can not be created

Public bug reported: [ 14.852661] [ cut here ] [ 14.852667] WARNING: at /build/buildd/linux-2.6.28/fs/sysfs/dir.c:462 sysfs_add_one+0x49/0x50() [ 14.852671] sysfs: duplicate filename 'ieee80211' can not be created [ 14.852674] Modules linked in: lbm_cw_cfg80211(+)

[Bug 213175] Re: scim-bridge crashed with SIGSEGV in scim::IMEngineInstanceBase::get_frontend_data()

I was not doing anything in particular when this happened. I had just logged in, and my locale is en_DK. Normal Swedish keyboard is default. Although I have the possibility to switch to Chinese IM, it was not active at the time. -- scim-bridge crashed with SIGSEGV in scim::IMEngineInstanceBase::

[Bug 453226] Re: WARNING: at /build/buildd/linux-2.6.31/fs/buffer.c:1152 mark_buffer_dirty+0x70/0x90()

Got this together with bug #419662, bug #419663 and bug #453462. -- WARNING: at /build/buildd/linux-2.6.31/fs/buffer.c:1152 mark_buffer_dirty+0x70/0x90() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/453226 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubun

[Bug 419662] Re: devkit-disks-helper-ata-smart-collect assert failure: devkit-disks-helper-ata-smart-collect: atasmart.c:2687: sk_disk_get_blob: Assertion `(size_t) ((uint8_t*) p - (uint8_t*) d->blob)

Got this just after bug #419663 -- devkit-disks-helper-ata-smart-collect assert failure: devkit-disks-helper-ata-smart-collect: atasmart.c:2687: sk_disk_get_blob: Assertion `(size_t) ((uint8_t*) p - (uint8_t*) d->blob) == size' failed. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/419662 You received this bu

[Bug 419663] Re: devkit-disks-daemon assert failure: devkit-disks-daemon: atasmart.c:2701: sk_disk_set_blob: Assertion `blob' failed.

Got this crash after attaching three USB disks, of which one is reported by palimpsest as having many reallocated sectors. Both lvm and md is involved, in particular two lvm/dm volumes are configured in a RAID-1 configuration, which is probably an untested configuration and an invitation to race co

[Bug 219199] Re: I cant compiled kernel source from kernel.org using kernel-package

> I solved it by doing make menuconfig and disabling xen client support. The only reason I'm compiling my own kernel is to get xen support, so that workaround is not an option for me. -- I cant compiled kernel source from kernel.org using kernel-package https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/219199 You

[Bug 302499] [NEW] Ubiquity should be able to run outside the install CD

Public bug reported: Binary package hint: ubiquity This is a feature request, based on bug #189193 . Some users (at least two known in the world *ahem*) expect to be able to install ubiquity on a normal system and then run it to con

[Bug 189193] Re: Installer crashed

I experienced this exact problem, and can shine some light on what's happening. The bug is: Ubiquity gives an unclear error message. Instead of something cryptic about the internals of the process, it should say "cloop image not found. Please run Ubiquity from the install CD or mount the cloop