Public bug reported:
Upgrading to openssl 1.0.2h-1+deb.sury.org~trusty+1 from openssl 1.0.1f-
1ubuntu2 results in the following error:
hex string is too long
invalid hex key value
when executing the following command:
echo "encrypted" | openssl enc -a -d -aes-256-cbc -K "hex_value" -iv
"iv_valu
Seems to be fixed in 3.13.0-66.107, which is available for Ubuntu 14.04
now.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1501345
Title:
linux-image-3.13.0-65-generic breaks serial communication
T
nary that is downloaded from dropbox, though perhaps removing the
/var/lib/dropbox/.dorpbox-dist
dir in pre-install could be considered if the update always will refresh that
directory.
Thanks,
Bouke Bunnik
** Affects: nautilus-dropbox (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
**
day before; that
might have
played a role (it also set windows to be the 1st EFI boot option, without my
aksing).
Bouke Bunnik
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1241658
Title:
package grub-
This might not be ontopic for this bug, as I have dkms version
2.2.0.3-1ubuntu1 installed, but what exactly is the intent of the check?
I have kernel-ppa v.3.7.6-030706-generic, with headers installed, but
this check seems to stop me from using dkms with it. Same for, for
example, the xedgers-ppa
Maybe I misunderstand the meaning of the "importance" bit. I thought it
was importance to the functioning of this package, so that availability
of other package managers is irrelevant to its setting.
While changing the bug's importance doesn't change anyone's priorities
in fixing aptitude, it does
Public bug reported:
During the Distribution Upgrade process from 11.10 I got this error
message. Since the upgrade is still in progress, I don't yet know what
this effectively means. Will update information after install is done.
** Affects: update-manager (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Hm, so no, that isn't likely it, the timeout happened with some others too.
This though (/var/log/dist-upgrade/apt-term.log):
Setting up update-notifier-common (0.119ubuntu8.2) ...
ttf-mscorefonts-installer: downloading http://downloads.sourceforge.net/corefont
s/andale32.exe
Traceback (most recen
>From /var/log/dist-upgrade/main.log:
---
2012-05-22 11:17:24,740 DEBUG got a conffile-prompt from dpkg for file: '/etc/up
date-manager/release-upgrades'
2012-05-22 11:33:04,843 WARNING no activity on terminal for 240 seconds
(Configuring update-manager-core)
2012-05-22 11:33:49,832 ERROR got an e
I also just encountered this same issue, using a dark KDE theme, where
the text colour is therefore light. Branches are particularly
troublesome, being white on a yellow background, tags are barely visible
on the bright green background.
KDE has several text colours/backgrounds in the themes for d
** Attachment added: "hpf220-colourswrong-tricolor.png"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/903171/+attachment/2629486/+files/hpf220-colourswrong-tricolor.png
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/b
Public bug reported:
I have not heavily tested colour use on 11.04 though. For that reason,
this could still be a manifestation of bug Bug #777670 (wrong colors on
HPCLJ 3500/3600 printer after switching to 11.04), since my problem is
manifesting in the same way, or so I thought.
I decided to fil
#14 same for me, I'm really considering moving back to natty until this
is fixed (also due to some other problems). So what would effect does
that workaround have, and what are the side effects?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
I just encountered compiz crashing in a way that is rather identical to
this issue, by pressing 0 to switch windows. I have unity
(3.8.2-0ubuntu1), so it seems that didn't fully fix the compiz crash.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribe
not much news to add; same symptom as mentioned in comment #19; and
agreeing with #21.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/697095
Title:
polkit-gnome-authentication-agent-1 crashed with SI
Well, since I have now seen about 5-10 different instances of what seems
to be this bug over the last week, it seems on my system it is rather
reproducible. Is there anything else I can do to help get it fixed? It
is rather annoying - at the moment my wife also regularly uses the
laptop, so we log
Similar thing, but on amd64 machine - happened on startup+login
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/684445
Title:
compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in pthread_mutex_lock()
--
ubuntu-bugs maili
#43 - delance, that version of os-prober is from before the fix,
explaining why you get the problem. A bit sad that this issue wasn't
fixed before releasing the Maverick CD.
Jérôme De Greef, #40 Thanks for I think that hivex is a good way to
check for what entries are present in the BCBD, but do
I have the same bug, not sure how it happened, got a crash report when getting
back from tea, saw it after unlocking my screen.
I do have version 0.88-2.1 of libdbus-glib-1-2-dbg.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https
It also affects my Dell Latitude E6510
uname -a
Linux ... 2.6.35-22-generic #35-Ubuntu SMP Sat Oct 16 20:45:36 UTC 2010 x86_64
GNU/Linux
$ xinput -list
⎡ Virtual core pointer id=2[master pointer (3)]
⎜ ↳ Virtual core XTEST pointerid=4[slave po
See the attached patch, combining the changes of bdoe and my added match
for the recovery partition "Windows Setup", applies to version in Ubuntu
Lucid/10.04 (maybe it is different from others because I have a Dutch
version of Vista; Acer TravelMate 6292).
** Patch added: "patch to the /usr/lib/os
RIght, now that Brian Doe provided a fix for the Vista identification, I
decided to see if my believe about the recovery partition not being
matched and thus being detected as the default of Windows Vista was
correct. Following the insructions from comment #7, I installed hivax,
and checked the BCD
Brian Doe, thanks for your attempt at fixing this. I suffer from this
issue, and I do have a recovery partition (well, suffer: I had to tell
my wife not to boot Vista but the recovery partition instead). Your
modification solves the misidentification of the Windows Vista
partition, so in that sense
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39052299/Dependencies.txt
--
Saving a ods file with comments to .doc crashes OpenOffice
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/520356
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: openoffice.org
When I want to save a normal .ods-document (about 2 pages long) to .doc (XP)
the usual "Do you want to save in the format anyway?"-messagebox pops up, and
when I click "keep current format" OpenOffice crashes.
There are comments in the d
direct after rebooting from windows vista. same kernel as above. Acer
Travelmate 6292.
--
WARNING: at /build/buildd/linux-2.6.31/net/mac80211/scan.c:281
ieee80211_scan_completed+0xcf/0x3f0 [mac80211]()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/437256
You received this bug notification because you are a me
26 matches
Mail list logo