[Bug 1668474]

Backported to 2.4.x (r1898588), will be in 2.4.53. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1668474 Title: AH00526 when using long ProxyPass worker name To manage notifications about this bug

[Bug 1668474]

I created https://github.com/apache/httpd/pull/288, would you try the patch there (https://patch- diff.githubusercontent.com/raw/apache/httpd/pull/288.diff)? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bu

[Bug 1641238]

(In reply to Lubos Uhliarik from comment #50) This follow up issue is being handled in bug 63891, a patch for 2.4 is available there (not yet backported to 2.4.next). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launch

[Bug 1641238]

Yes, likely scheduled for 2.4.40, missing one vote only. Please note that the patch has been updated to v6 to resolve some conflicts from unrelated changes already merged in 2.4.40. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. http

[Bug 1641238]

Yes, the patch did not make it to 2.4.39 which was mainly a security release, and this change is not really trivial.. Hopefully 2.4.40 is coming soon. As for v5 ([0] below, just in case), I just tried to apply it on top of 2.4.39 (from svn) and then to apply the freebsd patches from your link, but

[Bug 1641238]

Everything looks fine until: [Fri Mar 08 15:23:06.165463 2019] [proxy:error] [pid 869:tid 140678264567552] (104)Connection reset by peer: [client 127.0.0.1:53920] AH01084: pass request body failed to 127.0.0.1:42180 (localhost) [Fri Mar 08 15:23:06.165530 2019] [proxy_http:error] [pid 869:tid 14

[Bug 1641238]

Looks like a backend error, could you please provide the error log with LogLevel trace7 and mod_dumpio configured (DumpIoInput on, DumpIoOutput on)? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/164123

[Bug 1641238]

The latest patch is: http://people.apache.org/~ylavic/patches/httpd-2.4.x-forward_100_continue-v4.patch What's the problem in your case? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1641238 Title:

[Bug 1641238]

Thanks Michael for the very appropriate test: first 401 which avoids the "100 continue" danse and thus gets forwarded with "connection: close", second 201 with the full thing. Great! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. htt

[Bug 1641238]

(In reply to Yann Ylavic from comment #28) > tomcat CONNECTORS-1564 Looks like it's Solr actually, but all tests are welcome. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1641238 Title: as a rever

[Bug 1641238]

Proposed for backport to 2.4.x (r1853409), let's see what other committers think, notably if it's too much of a change for the stable branch. If so, this will have to wait for next 2.6/3.0... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubu

[Bug 1641238]

Also, testing the tomcat CONNECTORS-1564 case with the final patch ([1]) would be very welcome ;) [1] http://people.apache.org/~ylavic/patches/httpd-2.4.x-forward_100_continue.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. http

[Bug 1641238]

Thanks for testing Michael. Fixed in r1836648 (hopefully). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1641238 Title: as a reverse proxy, a 100 continue response is sent prematurely when a requ

[Bug 1641238]

Thanks Jean-Frédéric, applied in r1836588. This is the same patch (plus a req != NULL check) rebased on latest trunk, right? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1641238 Title: as a revers

[Bug 1641238]

Yes please do, along with the httpd error_log with LogLevel trace7. Thanks! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1641238 Title: as a reverse proxy, a 100 continue response is sent premature

[Bug 1641238]

Thanks Michael, at first glance the error_log is with mod_proxy_ajp, while attachment 34451 is about mod_proxy_http (and I'd like to keep the scope there for now). I agree that unpatched mod_proxy_http sends "100 continue" too soon (actually independently on the client and backend side). The pat