re-reading this, the issue I was seeing was that the protocol wasn't
negotiated - did not need to restart ovs to get the 'good' test.
Apologies for the noise, it does actually look like this is also fixed
in 2.13.0-0ubuntu1 and possibly could be updated for openvswitch
(Ubuntu).
--
You received t
Seeing this in Focal, openvswitch version 2.13.0-0ubuntu1
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1852221
Title:
ovs-vswitchd needs to be forced to reconfigure after adding protocols
to brid
Hi, just wondering if there's any update on the work to get this into
Bionic?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1734204
Title:
Insufficient free host memory pages available to allocate
Public bug reported:
When I use the icingaweb2 package 2.7.2-1.bionic, I hit
https://github.com/Icinga/icingaweb2/issues/3459. If I use
2.7.3-1.bionic from the upstream repo https://packages.icinga.com/ubuntu
this is fixed - can we get a refresh?
Reproducer: follow
https://icinga.com/docs/icinga
** Tags added: canonical-bootstack
** Changed in: juju (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => New
** Package changed: juju (Ubuntu) => juju
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1078213
Title:
The pvscan issue is likely something different, just wanted to make sure
folks are aware of it for completeness.
The logs /var/log/ceph/ceph-volume-systemd.log and ceph-volume.log are
empty.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubu
Let me word that last comment differently.
I went to the host and installed the PPA update, then rebooted.
When the box booted up, the PV which hosts the wal LVs wasn't listed in
lsblk or 'pvs' or lvs. I then ran pvscan --cache, which brought the LVs
back online, but not the OSDs, so I rebooted.
After installing that PPA update and rebooting, the PV for the wal
didn't come online till I ran pvscan --cache. Seems a second reboot
didn't do that though, might have been a red herring from prior
attempts.
Unfortunately, the OSDs didn't seem to come online in exactly the same
way after install
Thanks, will do. FWIW, the symlinks are in place before reboot.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1828617
Title:
Hosts randomly 'losing' disks, breaking ceph-osd service enumeration
To
journalctl --no-pager -lu systemd-udevd.service >/tmp/1828617-1.out
Hostname obfusticated
lsblk:
NAME
MAJ:MIN RM SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINT
loop0
udevadm info -e >/tmp/1828617-2.out
~# ls -l /var/lib/ceph/osd/ceph*
-rw--- 1 ceph ceph 69 May 21 08:44
/var/lib/ceph/osd/ceph.client.osd-upgrade.keyring
/var/lib/ceph/osd/ceph-11:
total 24
lrwxrwxrwx 1 ceph ceph 93 May 28 22:12 block ->
/dev/ceph-33de740d-bd8c-4b47-a601-3e6e634e489a/osd-b
Charm is cs:ceph-osd-284
Ceph version is 12.2.11-0ubuntu0.18.04.2
The udev rules are created by curtin during the maas install.
Here's an example udev rule:
cat bcache4.rules
# Written by curtin
SUBSYSTEM=="block", ACTION=="add|change",
ENV{CACHED_UUID}=="7b0e872b-ac78-4c4e-af18-8ccdce5962f6",
Just one update, if I change the perms of the symlink made (chown -h)
the OSD will actually start.
After rebooting, however, I found that the links I had made had gone
again and the whole process needed repeating in order to start the OSD.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
Added field-critical, there's a cloud deploy ongoing where I currently
can't reboot any hosts, nor get some of the OSDs back from a host I
rebooted, until we have a workaround.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bu
I'm seeing this in a slightly different manner, on Bionic/Queens.
We have LVMs encrypted (thanks Vault), and rebooting a host results in
at least one OSD not returning fairly consistently. The LVs appear in
the list, however the difference between a working and a non-working OSD
is the lack of li
** Tags added: canonical-bootstack
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1828617
Title:
Hosts randomly 'losing' disks, breaking ceph-osd service enumeration
To manage notifications about th
subscribed field-high, added Ubuntu Neutron package, since this has
occurred in multiple production sites.
** Also affects: neutron (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
h
** Merge proposal linked:
https://code.launchpad.net/~xavpaice/nagios-charm/+git/nagios-charm/+merge/366740
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1827159
Title:
check_all_disks includes
Public bug reported:
When using nagios to monitor the Nagios host itself, if the host is not
a container, the template for checking the disk space on the Nagios host
does not exclude any snap filesystems. This means we get a Critical
report if any snap is installed.
This can be changed by adding
Public bug reported:
When removing a host (because it got rebuilt, for example), we use:
openstack compute service delete
I expected that to remove the hostname cleanly from the database (or at
least mark it as deleted) so that the hostname can be re-used. This
isn't the case, the host remaine
How do we go about getting this moving forward from cloud-archive
:queens-proposed to stable so we can run this in production?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1809454
Title:
[SRU] nova
** Tags added: canonical-bootstack
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1809454
Title:
[SRU] nova rbd auth fallback uses cinder user with libvirt secret
To manage notifications about this
fwiw, setting Horizon to run with debug appears to allow things to work
OK, but of course we don't want to leave it that way.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1802226
Title:
upgrade to
Public bug reported:
Using Queens on Xenial. We updated the packages to the current
versions:
~$ apt-cache policy openstack-dashboard-ubuntu-theme
openstack-dashboard-ubuntu-theme:
Installed: 3:13.0.1-0ubuntu3~cloud0
Candidate: 3:13.0.1-0ubuntu3~cloud0
Version table:
*** 3:13.0.1-0ubuntu3
Just a clarification on the process to 'move' ceph-mon units. I added
ceph mons to the cluster, and removed the old ones - in this case it was
a 'juju add-unit' and 'juju remove-unit' but any process to achieve the
same thing would have the same result - the mons are now all on
different addresses
Subscribed field-high because we have an active environment (more?) that
are are affected by this using Xenial/Ocata, and we really need that SRU
released.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs
Any update on when we might land an SRU for Xenial?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1737866
Title:
Too many open files when large number of routers on a host
To manage notifications a
Subscribed field-high. This is affecting production environments.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1744062
Title:
[SRU] L3 HA: multiple agents are active at the same time
To manage no
Corey, as far as I'm aware there isn't a bug open for the keepalived
package (for Xenial at least). Are you suggesting that we open a bug
for a backport to the current cloudarchive package?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubun
Comment for the folks that are noticing this as 'fix released' but still
affected - see
https://github.com/acassen/keepalived/commit/e90a633c34fbe6ebbb891aa98bf29ce579b8b45c
for the rest of this fix, we need keepalived to be at least 1.4.0 in
order to have this commit.
--
You received this bug no
Thanks! I won't claim to understand what that change did, but adding
the two lines as requested does seem to resolve the issue. I opened up
Netflix and was able to watch, without the crash, and there wasn't any
new entries in syslog.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a membe
Public bug reported:
Ubuntu 18.04, Firefox 60.0.1+build2-0ubuntu0.18.04.1
Running firefix, then going to netflix.com and attempting to play a
movie. The widevinecdm plugin crashes, the following is found in
syslog:
Jun 15 19:13:22 xplt kernel: [301351.553043] audit: type=1400
audit(1529046802
FWIW, in the cloud we saw this, migrating the (stopped) instance also
updated the connection info - it was just that migrating hundreds of
instances wasn't practical.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchp
FWIW, seeing this using any desktop environment, and at the login
screen. Have tried, i3, awesomewm, Gnome and Unity.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1313539
Title:
[DisplayPort] moni
Seeing this on Bionic also, with 2 external screens and the built in
laptop display.
product: UX303UA
vendor: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC.
product: HD Graphics 520
configuration: driver=i915 latency=0
I've attached my Xorg.log if that's helpful.
On first boot, or after unplugging the exte
It really didn't like me trying to attach the log file. Here's a
pastebin: https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/mm4cwkGv4z/
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1313539
Title:
[DisplayPort] monitor
This was reproduced with a heat template, but just running the steps at
the start of the case from horizon are enough. Note that neutron-
gateway was deployed with aa-profile-mode set to complain, not the
default setting.
Changing this to 'disable' seems to have fixed the problem, more testing
is
Apparmor is in 'complain' mode, the logs show the same entries but
allowed rather than denied.
Worth trying that change first, then installing -proposed if that makes
no difference. This is a production site after all.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bug
Please note that this affects customers as follows;
- customer creates a lbaas, no backends come up
- we restart the service, and backends come to life
- customer creates another lbaas, the running one is fine but the new one has
no backends
- we restart... etc
This means for every new load bala
Due to customer impact, have subscribed field-high.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1770040
Title:
lbaas load balancer does not forward traffic unless agent restarted
To manage notifi
We're also seeing this with 4.4.0-111-generic (on Trusty), and a very
similar hardware profile. The boxes in question are running Swift with
a large (millions) number of objects all approx 32k in size.
I'm currently fio'ing in a test environment to try to reproduce this
away from production.
--
** Tags added: canonical-bootstack
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1724173
Title:
bcache makes the whole io system hang after long run time
To manage notifications about this bug go t
We have installed the Ocata -proposed package, however the situation is
this:
- there's 464 routers configured, on 3 Neutron gateway hosts, using l3-ha, and
each router is scheduled to all 3 hosts.
- we installed the package because were in a situation with a current incident
with multiple l3 ag
Please note, we now have a client affected by this running Mitaka as
well.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1731595
Title:
L3 HA: multiple agents are active at the same time
To manage
** Changed in: nagios-charm
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1623658
Title:
livestatus socket permission
To manage notifications about this
https://code.launchpad.net/~xavpaice/nagios-charm/+git/nagios-
charm/+merge/329344
** Merge proposal linked:
https://code.launchpad.net/~xavpaice/nagios-charm/+git/nagios-charm/+merge/329344
** Changed in: nagios-charm
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug not
** Changed in: nagios-charm
Status: New => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1623658
Title:
livestatus socket permission
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://code.launchpad.net/~xavpaice/nagios-charm/+git/nagios-
charm/+merge/328677
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1623658
Title:
livestatus socket permission
To manage notifications
In https://git.launchpad.net/nagios-charm/tree/hooks/install the Nagios
charm creates the mklivestatus directory and sets perms. We will need
to change this to add +x.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launc
apologies for the vile wrapping. For those with access,
https://pastebin.canonical.com/192695/ might be easier to read.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1702595
Title:
Upgrade neutron-
Public bug reported:
On upgrading neutron on a compute node, instances on that node wound up
losing some of their network plumbing via openvswitch.
This cloud: Mitaka, xenial, openvswitch with gre.
2017-07-05 16:17:52, the following auto-upgrade occurred: neutron-
common:amd64 (2:8.4.0-0ubuntu2
** Package changed: nagios (Juju Charms Collection) => check-mk (Ubuntu)
** Also affects: nagios-charm
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1623658
** Tags added: canonical-bootstack
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1679823
Title:
bond0: Invalid MTU 9000 requested, hw max 1500 with kernel 4.10 (or
4.8.0-49, xenial-hwe)
To manage
** Tags added: canonical-bootstack
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1588391
Title:
ceilometer charm creates world-readable
/etc/ceilometer/ceilometer.conf, exposing credentials
To ma
>From the logs it looks like the patch is now a part of
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1627730 which hit
4.4.0-46.67~14.04.1 (proposed) on 22nd Oct?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.lau
comment #8 was pretty clear that this isn't regarded as something that
needs fixing. If that's still the case, this should be closed as
wontfix.
I don't know another way round it though - and if changing the package
is the wrong approach I would like to know the right approach so we can
take the
I see your point, and agree in principal, but the effect of this is that
we cannot use the Ubuntu Cloud Archive until Swift is changed to use the
Ceilometer code in some other way. That's a pretty significant change,
and a diversion from the approach described by the devs of Ceilometer in
their ow
I'm happy to submit a patch if someone could please point me at how? I
looked at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam/OpenStack#Submitting_a_Patch but get
"bzr: ERROR: development focus
https://api.launchpad.net/1.0/ceilometer/liberty has no branch" in
return. No doubt some newbie problem here, a p
Public bug reported:
In ceilometer-common.postinst, permissions for the dir
/var/log/ceilometer are set to 750.
In http://docs.openstack.org/developer/ceilometer/install/manual.html
it's stated to "Note Please make sure that ceilometer’s logging
directory (if it’s configured) is read and write ac
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1387251 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1387251
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1387251
apparmor conflict with precise cloud archive
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
60 matches
Mail list logo
