[Bug 1393752] Re: missing symbols in libssl1.0.1f-1ubuntu2.7

2014-12-09 Thread Thomas Berger
I have done more tests. The issue could be in the debian package building helpers. The library located in the target-directory after the build step does export all symbols. After the packaging process, all symbols starting with an underscore are missing. Maybe this effects other packages too. --

[Bug 1393752] Re: missing symbols in libssl1.0.1f-1ubuntu2.7

2014-11-18 Thread Thomas Berger
I did some more research. It looks like every symbol with a leading underscore disappears if build with debuild or other. I have tried to remove all compiler and linker flags not needed or differ from vanilla build, but this had no effect. As i could not see any other relevant changes within the

[Bug 1393752] Re: missing symbols in libssl1.0.1f-1ubuntu2.7

2014-11-18 Thread Thomas Berger
The symbol was in libssl since 200x. In libssl0.9.8 it is still present, but the libssl-dev headers does not match the old libssl version, -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1393752 Title:

[Bug 1393752] [NEW] missing symbols in libssl1.0.1f-1ubuntu2.7

2014-11-18 Thread Thomas Berger
Public bug reported: _CONF_new_data is not exported. The function definition is still in the headers: # grep -r _CONF_new_data /usr/include/ /usr/include/openssl/conf_api.h:int _CONF_new_data(CONF *conf); The library itself does not export the symbol: $ readelf -Ws /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcryp

[Bug 752542] Re: ACPI DSDT info

2012-01-02 Thread Thomas Berger
Hi all. I had some discussions about Hybrid Graphics and Linux with some nVidia Devs. We think , the best way to implement Hybrid Graphic Systems like Optimus is an X11 Extension, at it is not part of a unix kernel module to decide on which Device an Xorg Call should end. I will have a deeper loo