[Bug 550559] Re: hdd problems, failed command: READ FPDMA QUEUED

2012-04-09 Thread Steve Franks
@penalvch : > apport-collect -p linux 550559 "You are not the reporter or subscriber of this problem report, or the report is a duplicate or already closed. Please create a new report using "apport-bug"." Then tried apport-bug and it complains that I'm not running a ubuntu kernel, which kinda m

[Bug 550559] Re: hdd problems, failed command: READ FPDMA QUEUED

2012-04-09 Thread Steve Franks
@penalvch : It's happening to me right now on 3.1.8, on a month-old Lenovo E420 and a brand-new OCZ Virtex2 60GB SSD. Is that upstream enough for ya? Steve Apr 9 12:01:07 fyre kernel: [ 104.803190] ata1: hard resetting link Apr 9 12:01:07 fyre kernel: [ 105.129298] ata1: SATA link up 6.0 Gbp

[Bug 773014] Re: Natty: GUI occasionally does not register mouse / touchpad clicks

2011-05-02 Thread Steve Franks
+1, and I'm on a mobo with a builtin Intel VGA chipset, so it ain't a nvidia issue for me. description: VGA compatible controller product: 82G33/G31 Express Integrated Graphics Controller vendor: Intel Corporation configuration: driver=i915 latency=0 -- You received this bug notification because

[Bug 315113] Re: Evolution outbox still shows 2 emails after deleting 1 of them

2009-01-08 Thread Steve Franks
** Description changed: Binary package hint: evolution Evolution changed the default when I added a new account. I didn't notice, so it tried to send from the wrong account. I corrected this by deleting the email from outbox and creating a new email, which I sent from the right account.

[Bug 315113] [NEW] Evolution outbox still shows 2 emails after deleting 1 of them

2009-01-08 Thread Steve Franks
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: evolution Evolution changed the default when I added a new account. I didn't notice, so it tried to send from the wrong account. I corrected this by deleting the email from outbox and creating a new email, which I sent from the right account. Outbox sti

[Bug 315113] Re: Evolution outbox still shows 2 emails after deleting 1 of them

2009-01-08 Thread Steve Franks
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/21011651/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcMaps.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/21011654/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcStatus.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/21011657/ProcStatus.txt -- Evolut

Re: [Bug 173891] Re: basic won't access spreadsheet row > 255

2008-07-24 Thread Steve Franks
Chris Cheney wrote: > Do you still have this problem with openoffice.org 1:2.4.1-1ubuntu2 in > Ubuntu 8.04? > > ** Changed in: openoffice.org (Ubuntu) >Status: New => Incomplete > > No, it was my mistake all along. If you look at the code sample I sent, you'll see that I had transposed

[Bug 173891] Re: basic won't access spreadsheet row > 255

2008-04-13 Thread Steve Franks
This bug is still present in the version 2.4.0. release. -- basic won't access spreadsheet row > 255 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/173891 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ub

RE: [Bug 173891] Re: basic won't access spreadsheet row > 255

2008-03-28 Thread Steve Franks
That's odd. I've only just started programming with OpenOffice, so probably did something stupid. The macro was stored somewhere else, but I've now moved it into the spreadsheet and set it to run when the document is opened. It generates an error as soon as the index exceeds 255. The error lies i

RE: [Bug 173891] Re: basic won't access spreadsheet row > 255

2008-03-27 Thread Steve Franks
It only appears when the macro runs. Regards Steve -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Cheney Sent: 26 March 2008 01:20 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Bug 173891] Re: basic won't access spreadsheet row > 255 I believe that this bug has

RE: [Bug 173891] Re: basic won't access spreadsheet row > 255

2008-03-24 Thread Steve Franks
It isn't very big and the data isn't confidential. Regards Steve -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Cheney Sent: 20 March 2008 20:47 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Bug 173891] Re: basic won't access spreadsheet row > 255 Can you attach

Re: [Bug 173891] Re: basic won't access spreadsheet row > 255

2008-03-10 Thread Steve Franks
Yes, it still occurs in 2.4.0rc2 for XP. I haven't successfully installed it on my Ubuntu laptop yet. Regards Steve Chris Cheney wrote: > Do you still have this problem with OpenOffice.org 2.4.0~rc2 which is in > Ubuntu hardy (or on XP)? > > Thanks, > > Chris Cheney > > ** Changed in: openoffice

[Bug 173891] Re: basic won't access spreadsheet row > 255

2007-12-04 Thread Steve Franks
Openoffice in Windows XP does exactly the same . -- basic won't access spreadsheet row > 255 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/173891 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubun

[Bug 173891] Re: basic won't access spreadsheet row > 255

2007-12-04 Thread Steve Franks
** Attachment added: "Screenshot of error" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10723483/Screenshot-Index%20out%20ofbounds.png -- basic won't access spreadsheet row > 255 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/173891 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the b

[Bug 173891] basic won't access spreadsheet row > 255

2007-12-04 Thread Steve Franks
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: openoffice.org I have written a Basic macro to process data in a spreadsheet and the following command fails with a Basic Index Out of Bounds runtime error: cell= Sheet.getCellByPosition(k, 0) If k is greater than 255, even th