[Bug 648544] Re: gwibber "send with" account icons have ambiguous on/off states

Currently I have gwibber 3.1.0~bzr997-0ubuntu1~daily1~maverick installed, and attached is a screenshot comparing the enabled vs. disabled state of the Twitter icon. As you'll see in the screenshot the disabled state results only in the icon's opacity being reduced. I would suggest a more obvious

[Bug 702844] Re: Build+ship matching Firefox theme ("persona") by default for light-themes

I've recently tried a few personas meant to coordinate with my Ubuntu theme (i.e. Ambiance, Radiance, Element), however I found in each case that I preferred Firefox's default, GTK theme-inherited appearance. Firefox 3.0 and above do an excellent job of integrating with Gnome. So while it may be n

[Bug 568611] Re: Screen brightness control fails on Dell Studio 1558

Does this bug describe the same issue as bug #562005? The other bug seems to describe the issue as affecting a broader class of users, those with a particular family of Nvidia mobile chipsets, whereas this bug talk about a specific family of Dell laptops. I experience this very issue on my Lenovo

[Bug 648544] Re: gwibber "send with" account icons have ambiguous on/off states

** Attachment added: ""Send with" icons showing an enabled Twitter account, and disabled Buzz account" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/648544/+attachment/1641855/+files/gwibber-send-with.png -- gwibber "send with" account icons have ambiguous on/off states https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/64

[Bug 648544] [NEW] gwibber "send with" account icons have ambiguous on/off states

Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gwibber Gwibber's "send with" account icons at the bottom of the main window can be toggled on or off, however, the styling of the on/off states make it difficult to distinguish whether an account has been toggled on or off. Toggling an account off for a

[Bug 522538] Re: gwibber-service crashed with error in connect()

Has this bug been fixed in Maverick? I still encounter this bug virtually every time I come out of standby on my laptop (which is multiple times a day). I am running the Maverick beta with the following package versions: gwibber 2.31.94-0ubuntu1 gwibber-service

[Bug 639915] Re: telepathy-butterfly crashed with error in parse()

** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/639915/+attachment/1590385/+files/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcMaps.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/639915/+attachment/1590386/+files/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcStatus.txt" https://

[Bug 634438] Re: gwibber-service crashed with SIGSEGV in free()

** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/634438/+attachment/1562512/+files/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "Disassembly.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/634438/+attachment/1562513/+files/Disassembly.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcMaps.txt" http

[Bug 634438] [NEW] gwibber-service crashed with SIGSEGV in free()

Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gwibber Gwibber crashed in Maverick beta as I was attempting to add my Digg account. Gwibber version is 2.31.92-0ubuntu1. ProblemType: Crash DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10 Package: gwibber-service 2.31.92-0ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-20.29-

[Bug 511601] Re: vboxgtk crashed with AttributeError in __getattr__()

Any chance we can see this pushed to Lucid proposed? I know VBox OSE works fine, but this is a pretty glaring bug for those desiring the GTK experience. -- vboxgtk crashed with AttributeError in __getattr__() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/511601 You received this bug notification because you a

[Bug 428386] Re: Nautilus doesn't remember folder view when opening folder link

I too can confirm this bug still occurs in Karmic. nautilus version: GNOME nautilus 2.28.1 uname -a: Linux 2.6.31-15-generic #50-Ubuntu SMP Tue Nov 10 14:53:52 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux -- Nautilus doesn't remember folder view when opening folder link https:/

[Bug 393978] Re: Please update firefox-3.5 from beta/rc to stable

This is a rather strange release that's being called "final". * What is the reason that branding isn't included in the version in the repo? The novice user doesn't recognize and trust "Shiretoko". They were looking for "Firefox". * Why doesn't Firefox 3.5 replace Firefox 3.0? There are also s

[Bug 158840] Re: Totem starts maximized and without window borders

By the way, I'm using the following versions: totem: 2.26.1-0ubuntu5 compiz: 1:0.8.2-0ubuntu8.1 -- Totem starts maximized and without window borders https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/158840 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 158840] Re: Totem starts maximized and without window borders

Is anyone still seeing this issue? Since I've migrated to Jaunty, I am no longer experiencing this issue. Instead, I occasionally find totem starts with the window maximized, but restoring it works just fine. -- Totem starts maximized and without window borders https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1

[Bug 158840] Re: Totem starts maximized and without window borders

Is there an upstream bug for this issue? Is there anything that can be done to expedite its resolution? This bug has bitten me a number of times, and I can only imagine the horror of a new user realizing that their videos are stuck in fullscreen mode for some inexplicable reason. -- Totem start

[Bug 176204] Re: totem movie player stuck in fullscreen

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 158840 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/158840 If this bug is a duplicate, why hasn't it been marked as such? In my search for the original bug, I've now found two (this one, and bug #249219) that have comments indicating they are duplicates, but no clue

[Bug 249219] Re: Totem became stuck in fullscreen mode, but would still show windowed controls

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 158840 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/158840 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 158840 Totem starts maximized and without window borders -- Totem became stuck in fullscreen mode, but would still show windowed controls https://bugs.launch

[Bug 298600] Re: Django 1.0.1 is available

So Django 1.0.1 isn't open to consideration for intrepid-backports or intrepid-proposed? -- Django 1.0.1 is available https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/298600 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubu

[Bug 298600] [NEW] Django 1.0.1 is available

Public bug reported: Binary package hint: python-django I'm not sure whether it's practise to wait for packages to appear upstream, but Django 1.0.1 is out as of November 15th, 2008 (http://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/releases/1.0.1/). I'm hoping it can be made available in Intrepid. As of th

[Bug 267412] Re: Update zekr to 0.7.1-1 in repos

Thank you, Mohammad. I look forward to that update next zekr update! In the meantime I will make use of the launchpad repo you've pointed me to. Much appreciated. :) -- Update zekr to 0.7.1-1 in repos https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/267412 You received this bug notification because you are a m

[Bug 267412] [NEW] Update zekr to 0.7.1-1 in repos

Public bug reported: Binary package hint: zekr Please update zekr to version 0.7.1-1 in the repos. This latest version is even available from the SourceForge homepage for the zekr project, but it would be nice to have it in the Ubuntu repos. ** Affects: zekr (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided

[Bug 243722] Re: amsn 0.97: login doesn't work anymore due to a protocol change

Is there any chance that the fix for this issue will be backported to gutsy? Thanks! -- amsn 0.97: login doesn't work anymore due to a protocol change https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/243722 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.