Tested CPU ordering on both 6.11.0-21-generic 6.8.0-56-generic with modified
ACPI tables.
Everything looks correct:
Linux rmalz 6.11.0-19-generic #19~24.04.1-Ubuntu SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Mon Feb 17
11:51:52 UTC 2 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
NUMA node(s): 2
NUMA node0 CP
modified apic.dsl
** Attachment added: "modified_apic.dsl"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2097455/+attachment/5855117/+files/modified_apic.dsl
** Summary changed:
- Fix LAPIC/x2APIC parsing order
+ Incorrect LAPIC/x2APIC parsing order
--
You received this bug notifica
attaching apic.dsl files
** Attachment added: "clean_apic.dsl"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2097455/+attachment/5855116/+files/clean_apic.dsl
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.lau
Public bug reported:
[ Impact ]
* In Kernels with commit ec9aedb2aa1a (6.7) CPUs can be enumerated in the order
which violates ACPI specification that states:
"OSPM should initialize processors in the order that they appear in the
MADT"
* The problematic commit parses all LAPIC ent
Sorry for lack of update,
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DesktopTeam/TestPlans/gjs was not executed.
For a test I wrote a script to spam random windows
let win = new Gtk.Window({
title: "Hello, GJS",
default_width: 200,
default_height: 100,
});
and left it over a week checking if any crashes h
cts: gnome-shell (Ubuntu Noble)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: gnome-shell (Ubuntu Noble)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Robert Malz (rmalz)
** Changed in: gnome-shell (Ubuntu Noble)
Importance: Undecided => High
** Changed in: gnome-shell (Ubuntu Noble)
Status:
Status: New => In Progress
** Changed in: netplan.io (Ubuntu Noble)
Status: New => In Progress
** Changed in: netplan.io (Ubuntu Jammy)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Robert Malz (rmalz)
** Changed in: netplan.io (Ubuntu Noble)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Robert Malz (rm
Adding debdiff for jammy based on 0.106.1-7ubuntu0.22.04.4
** Patch added: "debdiff based on 0.106.1-7ubuntu0.22.04.4"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/netplan/+bug/2076319/+attachment/5810013/+files/jammy_04_to_05.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bu
Adding debdiff for noble
** Patch added: "noble debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/netplan/+bug/2076319/+attachment/5810012/+files/noble.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2076
** Patch removed: "noble.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/netplan.io/+bug/2077011/+attachment/5810010/+files/noble.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2077011
T
** Patch added: "noble.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/netplan.io/+bug/2077011/+attachment/5810010/+files/noble.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2077011
Tit
Tested package on jammy VMs for around week, no gjs crashes detected.
** Tags removed: verification-needed-jammy
** Tags added: verification-done-jammy
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2
Verified on Jammy in AWS workspaces.
Test plan:
1. Upgrade from 1.72.4-0ubuntu0.22.04.1 to
1.72.4-0ubuntu0.22.04.3~really.is.1.72.2.0ubuntu2
2. Monitor system for couple of days
Done in 3 VMs, no issues detected. I'll keep VMs running for couple of
days doing random GUI operations and update this
Verified issue on both linux/5.4.0-186.206 and linux/5.15.0-111.121.
Following steps from description I was not able to reproduce issue nor I did
not hit any new problems.
Marking as verified.
** Tags removed: verification-needed-focal-linux verification-needed-jammy-linux
** Tags added: verifica
Attaching tcpdump output without patch
** Attachment added: "base_5_15_104_filtered.pcap"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2061986/+attachment/5766752/+files/base_5_15_104_filtered.pcap
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which i
Attaching tcpdump output with patch
** Attachment added: "base_5_15_104_with_patch_filtered.pcap"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2061986/+attachment/5766753/+files/base_5_15_104_with_patch_filtered.pcap
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
roviding incorrect
credentials, which might
confuse users.
* Attaching tcpdump pcaps with SMB operations from 5.15 Kernel with and
without patch.
** Affects: linux (Ubuntu)
Importance: Medium
Assignee: Robert Malz (rmalz)
Status: New
** Affects: linux (Ubuntu Focal)
Im
irqbalance 1.9.3-2ubuntu4 verified on 6.8.0-11-generic
Issue no longer reproduces.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2054872
Title:
Cannot change IRQ 70 affinity: Input/output error
To
Progress
** Changed in: irqbalance (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Robert Malz (rmalz)
** Also affects: irqbalance (Ubuntu Noble)
Importance: Medium
Assignee: Robert Malz (rmalz)
Status: In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member
** Tags removed: verification-needed-mantic-linux
** Tags added: verification-done-mantic-linux
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2036239
Title:
Intel E810-XXV - NETDEV WATCHDOG: (ice):
LP update:
Mantic update:
Due to lack of reproduction environment I have been performing following
regression test:
1. Setup:
nic: 2port E810-C
both interfaces set up in bonding
kernel: 6.5.0-25-generic
2. Test cases:
0) verified that code from the change is used during driver in
Hi Roxana,
Mantic verification is still not finished.
I did some touch tests without stress traffic.
I'm trying to get my hands on E810 device to finish testing, I'll update ticket
once it's done.
Wishful ETA EOW 09.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
22 matches
Mail list logo