Ok on doing further research I'm reliably informed that this patch
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/dfaafbaaa291
might be a fix to the problem.
It appears that this isn't included in the source base on a quick
inspection. I'm traveling in the next week so I won't be able to test
this v
I realize that "rebuild" isn't sufficient here. The thing I hear is that
there was a mistaken assumption about VA size in Thunderbird and there
were fixes in upstream firefox / js engine for it and this part was not
rebuilt when Thunderbird was rebuilt for this release.
--
You received this bug n
Regardless of whether the fix maybe a rebuild or not , the thunderbird
package is completely borked on 17.04 on arm64.
Ramana
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1686087
Title:
Thunderbir
Public bug reported:
Running thunderbird on my arm64 box gives me the following backtrace.
Description:Ubuntu 17.04
Release:17.04
0xb60764a8 <+104>: and x0, x0, #0x7ff0
0xb60764ac <+108>: add x0, x0, #0xff, lsl #12
=> 0xb60764b0 <+11
** Changed in: gcc-linaro/4.6
Importance: Undecided => Medium
** Changed in: gcc-linaro/4.6
Status: New => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/990530
Title:
internal
** Changed in: gcc-linaro/4.6
Assignee: (unassigned) => Ramana Radhakrishnan (ramana)
** Changed in: gcc-linaro/4.7
Assignee: (unassigned) => Ramana Radhakrishnan (ramana)
** Changed in: gcc-linaro/4.7
Status: New => Fix Committed
** Changed in: gcc-linaro/4.7
** Changed in: gcc-linaro
Importance: Undecided => Medium
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/990530
Title:
internal compiler error: in convert, at lto/lto-lang.c:1292
To manage notifi
Looking at the disassembly it wasn't obvious to me what was wrong. Can
someone debug and find out what is going wrong here ? The instructions
generated are valid for vfpv3-d16 unless I've missed something while
looking at this -
Is there a problem with an unaligned memory address or something for
On 21 February 2012 16:25, Steve McIntyre <937...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 03:52:29PM -, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
>>Maybe I'm missing something, but as I understand those *are* valid VFPv3
>>(even VFPv2) instructions, not just NEON instructions ...
>
> Oh, hmmm...
>
> M
** Changed in: gcc-linaro/4.6
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/836588
Title:
armel FTBFS with gcc 4.5 org 4.6 O2 and fPIC
To manage notific
** Changed in: gcc-linaro/4.6
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/836588
Title:
armel FTBFS with gcc 4.5 org 4.6 O2 and fPIC
To manage notifica
** Changed in: gcc-linaro/4.6
Milestone: None => 4.6-2012.02
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/836588
Title:
armel FTBFS with gcc 4.5 org 4.6 O2 and fPIC
To manage notifications abo
This is funny -
For Linaro 4.6 for the afflicted instruction we see :
Reload 0: reload_out (SI) = (reg/v:SI 208 [ Suppressed ])
LO_REGS, RELOAD_OTHER (opnum = 0)
reload_out_reg: (reg/v:SI 208 [ Suppressed ])
Reload 1: reload_in (SI) = (reg/v:SI 1356 [ OnMacroInst ])
LO_R
Also happens on armel - so this is not just armhf.
Ramana
On 12 December 2011 21:48, Michael Hope <903...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote:
> The fault was introduced somewhere in bzr106805 to 106808.
>
> The most suspicious one is "
>
> 106807 [merge]
> committer: Ramana
I had the same problem and then realized that my schroot config had the
following line
script-config=desktop/config
While updating fstab in the default case might work in some cases , I
had to update fstab in /etc/schroot/desktop/fstab and then it all
worked.
Ramana
--
You received this bug n
On 11 October 2011 08:52, Jean-Luc Aufranc
wrote:
> I have the same problem compiling berkelium with linaro toolchain (gcc
> 4.5.2) on Ubuntu natty.
>
> /usr/lib/gcc/arm-linux-gnueabi/4.5.2/../../../../arm-linux-gnueabi/bin/ld:
> /home/jaufranc/edev/beagleboard/berkelium/build/chromium/src/out/Re
** Changed in: gcc-linaro
Milestone: None => 4.6-2011.09
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/838994
Title:
ICE building perl w/ -marm
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
htt
This is invalid for Linaro GCC since it was a problem with a patch that
was on trunk only and never made it back into Linaro GCC.
Ramana
** Changed in: gcc-linaro
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
The fix for http://gcc.gnu.org/PR50022 should have fixed this.
Ramana
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/810328
Title:
[armel/thumb] gnat ftbfs in trunk 20110709
To manage notifications
This causes other problems. So ignore this patch.
Ramana
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/810328
Title:
[armel/thumb] gnat ftbfs in trunk 20110709
To manage notifications about this b
Doko,
Could you try this patch - I am testing it but am not set up for
building ada.
Ramana
diff --git a/gcc/config/arm/vfp.md b/gcc/config/arm/vfp.md
index e2165a8..30d4d14 100644
--- a/gcc/config/arm/vfp.md
+++ b/gcc/config/arm/vfp.md
@@ -182,6 +182,10 @@
(set_attr "arch" "t2,any
common.cpp: In static member function 'static void CTimer::rdtsc(uint64_t&)':
common.cpp:107:56: error: impossible constraint in 'asm' caught my attention.
README.txt says
make -e os=XXX arch=YYY
XXX: [LINUX(default), BSD, OSX]
YYY: [IA32(default), POWERPC, IA64, AMD64]
Thus it probab
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 702090 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/702090
** Branch unlinked: lp:~rsandifo/gcc-linaro/lp721531-4.6
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/721631
** Changed in: gcc-linaro
Assignee: (unassigned) => Ramana Radhakrishnan (ramana)
** Changed in: gcc-linaro
Milestone: None => 4.6-2011.07
** Changed in: gcc-linaro
Status: Triaged => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ub
The mcr instruction cannot be used in Thumb1 which is what -mthumb
-mcpu=arm926ej-s forces you to do.
-marm will allow you to do so since it forces the instructions to be in
ARM state.
cheers
Ramana
** Changed in: gcc-4.5-armel-cross (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this
This looks like a compiler bug.
bin/bash ../../../../libtool --tag=CXX --mode=compile g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.
-I../../../../src/include -I/usr/lib/wx/include/gtk2-unicode-release-2.8
-I/usr/include/wx-2.8 -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_LARGE_FILES -D__WXGTK__
-pthread -I../../../../src/include -I.
To be clear this bug will manifest itself in a binutils that has been
built with --enable-targets=all or any binutils that has a 64 bit target
in it's target list. Otherwise this will not manifest itself. That is
not an immediate problem for natty but it would be good to have the
patch in the sourc
A reduced testcase is now attached.
cheers
Ramana
** Attachment added: "min.ii"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcc-4.5/+bug/748138/+attachment/1991154/+files/min.ii
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https
Can you attach a pre-processed file with this ?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/745890
Title:
llvm-snapshot version 20100418-1 failed to build on armel
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ub
On 4 April 2011 03:16, Michael Hope <747...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote:
> binutils 2.21.50 contains the fix. Ramana, do you know what revision
> this is fixed in? One option might be cherry picking it.
If we want to cherry pick this we want this patch here.
Patch:
http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: binutils
That patch for http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11972
needs a backport into the Ubuntu binutils for armel
$> cat /tmp/tst.s
.cpu cortex-a9
.fpu neon
.text
vmov.i64 d9,#-4294967296
Native on pavo1 :
ramana@pavo1:~$ gcc -c /t
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 689887 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/689887
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 689887
armel ICE gcc 4.5
* You can subscribe to bug 689887 by following this link:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcc-4.5/+bug/689887/+subscribe
Confirmed with linaro-gcc 4.5 rev 99489 at all optimization levels and
FSF trunk.
cheers
Ramana
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/736661
Title:
armel FTBFS due to compiler ICE
--
ubun
** Changed in: gcc-linaro
Status: Incomplete => New
** Changed in: gcc-linaro
Status: New => Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/736661
Title:
armel FTBFS due to com
http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=38957 seems
relevant. See #c8 in that thread.
I think it's definitely not a compiler error but more of a package
configuration issue. Either ubuntu had a local patch to change this to
vfpv3-d16 or chromium did and someone dropped this patch ?
ch
Just in case - the AC100 is vfpv3-d16 hardware only.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/735877
Title:
Illegal instruction in chromium on startup on armel
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubu
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/735877
Title:
Illegal instruction in chromium on startup on armel
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mai
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: chromium-browser
I tried installing a new version of chromium on my AC100 and noticed
that it refused to start.
Installing debug info and look at the backtrace it appears as though
something is using the d16 register where it shouldn't . This is either
a
I have a patch being tested.
** Changed in: gcc-linaro
Assignee: (unassigned) => Ramana Radhakrishnan (ramana)
** Changed in: gcc-4.5 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
Related to http://gcc.gnu.org/PR46788 upstream.
Ramana
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/730440
Title:
armel: incorrect immediate for movt
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@list
** Changed in: gcc-4.5 (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/730440
Title:
armel: incorrect immediate for movt
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-
** Changed in: gcc-4.5 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/730440
Title:
armel: incorrect immediate for movt
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-
Missing pre-processed source and command line options.
Can you attach the .i file you get after running --save-temps on
the command line with the bug report ? It is much faster than
trying to recreate the environment and starting from there.
cheers
Ramana
--
You received this bug notificati
I wonder if this might need to be backported to 4.4
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-11/msg01545.html
--
[armel] unable to find a register to spill in class 'GENERAL_REGS'
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/506358
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, w
Looks similar to this one here.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40859
** Bug watch added: GCC Bugzilla #40859
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40859
--
[armel] excess errors in libstdc++ testsuite when built with glibc-2.11
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/505829
You r
The sibcall failures are due to sibcalls not being implemented for
Thumb2 in comparison to ARM.
--
[armel] additional testsuite failures with -mthumb (compared to -marm)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/497295
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is sub
These look normal to me - I don't see any special execution failures
comparing ARM and Thumb2.
--
[armel] additional testsuite failures with -mthumb (compared to -marm)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/497295
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subs
47 matches
Mail list logo
