[Bug 1876593] Re: Ethernet not working/Realtek RTL8169 fails to load

2021-12-28 Thread Peter Passchier
Just to add: it might be that the r8168-dmks driver works better for your hardware than the kernel's generic r8169, it did in my case. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1876593 Title: Et

[Bug 1880076] Re: ubuntu 20.4 - retransmitts with r8169

2021-12-28 Thread Peter Passchier
It depends on your actual hardware. I got this fixed by installing r8158-dkms, turned out the kernel's r8169 driver was not quite right for my ethernet hardware. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.ne

[Bug 1924526] [NEW] package linux-image-5.4.0-71-generic 5.4.0-71.79~18.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: new linux-image-5.4.0-71-generic package post-removal script subprocess returned error exit stat

2021-04-15 Thread Peter Passchier
Public bug reported: ? ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04 Package: linux-image-5.4.0-71-generic 5.4.0-71.79~18.04.1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-67.75~18.04.1-generic 5.4.94 Uname: Linux 5.4.0-67-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: zfs zunicode zavl icp zcommon znvpair Apport

[Bug 1924525] [NEW] package linux-image-5.4.0-67-generic 5.4.0-67.75~18.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: new linux-image-5.4.0-67-generic package post-removal script subprocess returned error exit stat

2021-04-15 Thread Peter Passchier
Public bug reported: Not sure... I was prompted to fill this in at some point in the do- release upgrade from 18.04 to 20.04 ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04 Package: linux-image-5.4.0-67-generic 5.4.0-67.75~18.04.1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-67.75~18.04.1-generic 5.4.94 U

[Bug 1847628] Re: When using swap in ZFS, system stops when you start using swap

2020-11-16 Thread Peter Passchier
Is there any hope that a swap on zvol with sync=standard at least doesn't hang/deadlock? Like: zfs create rpool/swap -V 2G -b $(getconf PAGESIZE) -o logbias=throughput -o sync=always -o primarycache=metadata -o secondarycache=none In my testing this didn't hang when swap got hit. -- You receiv

[Bug 1808421] Re: gparted produces unusual results when ZFS partitios exist

2020-11-15 Thread Peter Passchier
It seems gparted is interpreting data from blkid. In this case, when PTTYPE is 'gpt', that should just take precedence over TYPE being 'zfs_member'. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/180842

[Bug 1830110] Re: patch for finding zfs, solves: cryptsetup: WARNING: Couldn't determine root device

2020-11-14 Thread Peter Passchier
This needs to be in Focal! It's a LTS release. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1830110 Title: patch for finding zfs, solves: cryptsetup: WARNING: Couldn't determine root device To

[Bug 1883042] Re: Caja displays Date Modified as unknown for all entries

2020-07-27 Thread Peter Passchier
Not sure what changed (I know the kernel upgraded to 5.4.0-42-generic but caja wasn't upgraded), but it all works normally now... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1883042 Title: Caja di

[Bug 1883042] [NEW] Caja displays Date Modified as unknown for all entries

2020-06-10 Thread Peter Passchier
Public bug reported: Expected behaviour: show Date Modified properly. Actual behaviour: show "unknown" under the Date Modified column header for all entries. The sorting by clicking on the column header does work! This is a fresh install of Ubuntu MATE 20.04. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubu

[Bug 1580569] Re: copy paste between two open files fails

2019-11-13 Thread Peter Passchier
Also trying to copy from one label in one instance of glabels to an empty label of the same size in a different instance of glabels. This must be reproducable. Same error: glabels fatal error gl_label_object_set_position: assertion 'object && GL_IS_LABEL_OBJECT(object)' failed (Running Ubuntu M

[Bug 1814124] Re: sshd does not start after update

2019-02-22 Thread Peter Passchier
The entry in /usr/lib/tmpfiles.d/sshd.conf SHOULD be: d /run/sshd 0755 root root When it isn't, sshd cannot be started up after a reboot. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1814124 Title:

[Bug 1676164] Re: REQ: firefox-esr package needed

2017-12-15 Thread Peter Passchier
OT, but I agree, this is bad... I blame Mozilla first, but on this issue, Ubuntu is even more to blame. I am more and more running software outside of the repos, binaries or compiled here. At this rate I might go to something like Slackware... Or back to Gentoo or something based on it where you do

[Bug 1133477] Re: [SRU] cut-n-paste move files got stuck forever

2017-08-23 Thread Peter Passchier
Ubuntu 16.04.3 here, bug confirmed. With gvfs from proposed, the bug is fixed. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1133477 Title: [SRU] cut-n-paste move files got stuck forever To manage

[Bug 1636480] Re: gthumb 3.4.3 under Ubuntu Mate 16.04.01 does not show a menu

2017-07-03 Thread Peter Passchier
The workaround is to press F11 twice, and then the topbar/menubar does show up, but it should be possible to show it on opening the application. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1636480 T

[Bug 1676164] [NEW] REQ: firefox-esr package needed

2017-03-26 Thread Peter Passchier
Public bug reported: Just like Debian offers. Ubuntu needs to offer the firefox-esr package to be taken seriously in the enterprise space. And I am sure there are a lot of users that appreciate their addons not potentially breaking that often (which is the real issue for me personally). Our orga

[Bug 606365] Re: unable to import config with inlined ca, cert, key or tls-auth

2016-12-06 Thread Peter Passchier
I've found that removing the #comments in the TA key helped. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/606365 Title: unable to import config with inlined ca, cert, key or tls-auth To manage not

[Bug 1613260] Re: update-grub (grub-mkconfig) includes all kernels in boot, regardless whether version is in /lib/modules

2016-12-05 Thread Peter Passchier
Or if like you said in comment #1, if you build a kernel without modules which will run just fine without anything in /lib/modules. And in #3 you said, you can run any kernel (of the right architecture) from anywhere, and it seems you are right. But you can't customize or update the initrd for it

[Bug 1613260] Re: update-grub (grub-mkconfig) includes all kernels in boot, regardless whether version is in /lib/modules

2016-12-05 Thread Peter Passchier
I'm not building any kernels here. I am sharing the boot partition with various sorts of LUKS encrypted root partitions. I understand now why it is totally fine to run your system with all kinds of kernels & initrds. It just works. I also have a patch for 30_os-prober that fixes things. (It has m

[Bug 508901] Re: update-grub sets wrong root argument

2016-12-03 Thread Peter Passchier
The problem with this solution is, it is discarding most of the information of os-prober, and instead is just enumerating the kernels & initrds that are listed in /lib/modules. Now I haven't checked with many distributions, but I know Ubuntu, Debian, OpenSUSE and RedHat is using this same location.

[Bug 508901] Re: update-grub sets wrong root argument

2016-12-02 Thread Peter Passchier
This is fixed by applying this: https://gist.github.com/pepa65/85d5fcd1e12bc6028501c746258ac8cf -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/508901 Title: update-grub sets wrong root argument To m

[Bug 508901] Re: update-grub sets wrong root argument

2016-12-02 Thread Peter Passchier
This is fixed by applying this: https://gist.github.com/pepa65/85d5fcd1e12bc6028501c746258ac8cf -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/508901 Title: update-grub sets wrong root argument To m

[Bug 551790] Re: lucid update-grub wrong root=UUID=

2016-12-02 Thread Peter Passchier
This is fixed by applying this: https://gist.github.com/pepa65/85d5fcd1e12bc6028501c746258ac8cf -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/551790 Title: lucid update-grub wrong root=UUID= To man

[Bug 1613260] Re: update-grub (grub-mkconfig) includes all kernels in boot, regardless whether version is in /lib/modules

2016-12-02 Thread Peter Passchier
I understand you can build your own kernel and include all the necessary drivers and modules into the image. If you don't include everything in the kernel image, making an initramfs with update-initramfs is not going to work, it first issues a warning about the missing /lib/modules for that home-bu

[Bug 1613260] Re: update-grub (grub-mkconfig) includes all kernels in boot, regardless whether version is in /lib/modules

2016-09-19 Thread Peter Passchier
OK, I see your point. Maybe I've been looking at the wrong marker (although all installs of Ubuntu that I know of would have modules). But there must be some other marker that a particular kernel was never installed in this system?? Or are you saying that any random kernel from some other system/d

[Bug 1613260] [NEW] update-grub (grub-mkconfig) includes all kernels in boot, regardless whether version is in /lib/modules

2016-08-15 Thread Peter Passchier
Public bug reported: All kernels/initrds in /boot are included, also if they would never work. Below is a patch that fixes this. 1. Ubuntu 16.04.1 LTS (but it has always been like this) 2. grub-common 2.02~beta2-36ubuntu3.2 3. Only the kernels/initrds that have a version that is installed are lis