[Bug 1913384] Re: Request header parsing fails in some cases with Tomcat 9.0.31

2021-02-19 Thread Per Lundberg
Here are some more details about this, from the Tomcat 9.0 changelog: https://ci.apache.org/projects/tomcat/tomcat9/docs/changelog.html. Tomcat 9.0.33 introduces the fix: > 64210: Correct a regression in the improvements to HTTP header validation that caused requests to be incorrectly treated as i

[Bug 1880749] Re: python3 virtualenvs include (broken) bundled pip deps

2020-10-06 Thread Per Lundberg
For the record: This is still broken in Ubuntu 20.04 (Focal Fossa). It breaks Ansible being able to support 20.04 in their official PPA. Tracking ticket on the Ansible side: https://github.com/ansible/ansible/issues/69203 It would be awesome if someone with the time and energy would do the work su

[Bug 1666570] Re: Post install script has error in RegEx

2018-12-03 Thread Per Lundberg
One way to work around this until the package gets fixed in xenial is to escape the % sign in the JAVA_OPTS string: JAVA_OPTS="${JAVA_OPTS} -Xloggc:/var/log/tomcat7/gc-\%t.log" This has been tested and seems to make both the postinst script work, as well as make the JVM include the timestamp in t

[Bug 1666570] Re: Post install script has error in RegEx

2018-11-29 Thread Per Lundberg
Note: as implied by Mathew Hodson, the tomcat7 package for Xenial has _not_ yet been updated (because the package failed to build.) (We started seeing this bug appearing on some servers after upgrading to tomcat7, so I can personally verify that it's still present with 7.0.68-1ubuntu0.4.) It woul

[Bug 55626] Re: monodoc-browser: Unhandled Exception: System.TypeInitializationException

2006-08-21 Thread Per Lundberg
My data was from the wrong machine... Sorry. This is from the one where the bug was originally posted: ii libggi-target-monotext 2.0.5-1.1ubuntu2 General Graphics Interface plain text target ii libmono-cecil0.3-cil0.3-1build1

[Bug 55626] Re: monodoc-browser: Unhandled Exception: System.TypeInitializationException

2006-08-15 Thread Per Lundberg
It looks like below. I might have had mono installed from a 3rd party repository (backports.org?) earlier actually because I was running Debian sarge which did not have a recent mono distribution. But all my mono packages now seem to be up to date so it is probably a conffile somewhere that shouldn