[Bug 1279021] Re: CacheDir setting ignored

2014-12-22 Thread Niko Ehrenfeuchter
I can confirm this is still there with 0.7.27-1. Just create a directory somewhere else, assign the correct permissions, put it into the "CacheDir" setting of ACNG, restart the service - the new dir won't be used. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, whic

[Bug 1163184] Re: New upstream microreleases 9.1.9, 8.4.17

2013-04-04 Thread Niko Ehrenfeuchter
Alright, thanks for the clarification Martin. I'm still used to my old Debian world ;) Thanks for having the updated packages ready by now. How long do you expect to take them until they hit the repositories? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which i

[Bug 1163184] Re: New upstream microreleases 9.1.9, 8.4.17

2013-04-04 Thread Niko Ehrenfeuchter
I don't see why the urgency is set to "low" here. The news entry on the PostgreSQL website states clearly "All users of the affected versions are strongly urged to apply the update *immediately*." And the definition of "urgency" in the Debian policies (unofortunately I haven't been able to find

[Bug 610125] Re: pam_motd runs commands as root with unsanitised environment

2013-01-18 Thread Niko Ehrenfeuchter
Could we get an update here, please? There's a fix available for almost one and a half years now. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/610125 Title: pam_motd runs commands as root with unsa

[Bug 579112] Re: compiz crashes on alt-tab when gitk is running

2011-08-03 Thread Niko Ehrenfeuchter
I can reproduce this issue on my Maverick system here as well, with one special point worth being mentioned: this happens *only* if I manually configure "wish" to be provided by /usr/bin/wish8.5 instead of the default /usr/bin/wish8.4 using this command (and selecting the appropriate version): su

[Bug 579112] Re: compiz crashes on alt-tab when gitk is running

2011-08-03 Thread Niko Ehrenfeuchter
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #612560 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=612560 ** Also affects: compiz (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=612560 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because yo

[Bug 721320] Re: DKIM-related failures should not end up in the panic log

2011-07-12 Thread Niko Ehrenfeuchter
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #567876 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=567876 ** Also affects: exim4 (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=567876 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Bug watch added: bugs.exim.org/ #966 http://

[Bug 721320] Re: DKIM-related failures should not end up in the panic log

2011-07-12 Thread Niko Ehrenfeuchter
Ok, so what's the plan regarding the "long term" in LTS? There is a fix released upstream, but nothing happened with the exim4 package in lucid. To quote the inital reporter of this bug: "Can we please have a backport of this fix for Lucid - it makes running an Exim mailserver painful on that rele

[Bug 508545] Re: Aptitude ignores /etc/apt/preferences.d/*

2011-05-24 Thread Niko Ehrenfeuchter
** Tags added: maverick -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/508545 Title: Aptitude ignores /etc/apt/preferences.d/* -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists

[Bug 769595] Re: Encrypted home not mountable under chroot

2011-05-10 Thread Niko Ehrenfeuchter
Thanks a lot guys for finding the solution to this issue. Behavious is identical as described above on Maverick/10.10 (both, bug + solution). ** Tags added: maverick -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchp

[Bug 592891] Re: mountall: Assertion failed in main: udev_monitor = udev_monitor_new_from_netlink (udev, "udev")

2010-12-11 Thread Niko Ehrenfeuchter
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 516684 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/516684 I think this is very likely a duplicate of bug #516684 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 516684 After upgrade from Karmic boot fails, mountall and udevd fail * You can subscribe to bug 516684

[Bug 581566] Re: udevd inotify_add_watch no such directory error for physical volumes

2010-05-31 Thread Niko Ehrenfeuchter
This bug makes my boot-process stop for about 10-15 seconds, so it is really "bugging" me - what can be done to improve the situation? -- udevd inotify_add_watch no such directory error for physical volumes https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/581566 You received this bug notification because you are

[Bug 581566] Re: udevd inotify_add_watch no such directory error for physical volumes

2010-05-31 Thread Niko Ehrenfeuchter
** Tags added: boot -- udevd inotify_add_watch no such directory error for physical volumes https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/581566 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 563805] Re: mount.cifs won't mount shares; set uid bit not set

2010-05-19 Thread Niko Ehrenfeuchter
I think Dietmar's comment #5 is pretty interesting: the binaries in 9.10 did *NOT* have the suid-bit set, but it definitely worked for me back then (and for others too, as they reported). So there must have been a way to make this work. Have there been any of the mechanisms mentioned by Wladimir in

[Bug 581566] Re: udevd inotify_add_watch no such directory error for physical volumes

2010-05-19 Thread Niko Ehrenfeuchter
bug 441367 could be related, although it does not seem to be a real duplicate -- udevd inotify_add_watch no such directory error for physical volumes https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/581566 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 441367] Re: inotify_add_watch(6, (null), 10) failed: Bad address

2010-05-19 Thread Niko Ehrenfeuchter
There has recently been reported a similar bug to this one (although I suppose it is *not* a real duplicate of this one), concerning partitions declared as physical volumes for LVMs: #581566 -- inotify_add_watch(6, (null), 10) failed: Bad address https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/441367 You receive

[Bug 581566] Re: udevd inotify_add_watch no such directory error for physical volumes

2010-05-19 Thread Niko Ehrenfeuchter
Confirming this bug, similar situation here with multiple partitions defined as LVM physical volumes belonging to a volume group. > sudo fdisk -l /dev/sda > > Disk /dev/sda: 320.1 GB, 320072933376 bytes > 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 38913 cylinders > Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 by

[Bug 569543] Re: Could not identify preference: username Could not identify preference: session_key failure yet authed for services

2010-05-16 Thread Niko Ehrenfeuchter
The conclusion from my last report seems to me that it should be problematic to register the same facebook-account on multiple gwibber clients (should be verified, I think...) -- Could not identify preference: username Could not identify preference: session_key failure yet authed for services ht

[Bug 569543] Re: Could not identify preference: username Could not identify preference: session_key failure yet authed for services

2010-05-14 Thread Niko Ehrenfeuchter
Well, so I had to learn how to debug python myself... If you're not interested in details, jump straight to the bottom of this message. To see what's going on, I added the python-debugger to /usr/share/pyshared/gwibber/lib/gtk/facebook.py by adding "import pdb" at the end of the other import state

[Bug 569543] Re: Could not identify preference: username Could not identify preference: session_key failure yet authed for services

2010-05-12 Thread Niko Ehrenfeuchter
Ping, I'd really like to continue debugging this. No suggestions, nobody? -- Could not identify preference: username Could not identify preference: session_key failure yet authed for services https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/569543 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ub

[Bug 501479] Re: Codec Error - Cannot select the MPEG-4 SP codec

2010-05-09 Thread Niko Ehrenfeuchter
Confirming this bug in Lucid. Works fine with "avidemux-qt", fails with the Gtk-version. -- Codec Error - Cannot select the MPEG-4 SP codec https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/501479 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu

[Bug 569543] Re: Could not identify preference: username Could not identify preference: session_key failure yet authed for services

2010-05-04 Thread Niko Ehrenfeuchter
Ken, I still suffer from the above problem described by Magnus Stefanus, though you're right with your interpretation of the german localized message "Mit Facebook verbunden" (it reads "Facebook authorized" on my system here since I don't like to live in a localized Linux, apart from being a native

[Bug 569543] Re: Could not identify preference: username Could not identify preference: session_key failure yet authed for services

2010-05-04 Thread Niko Ehrenfeuchter
Reset tags to "verification-needed" as it does not work for Magnus Stefanus and myself. ** Tags added: verification-needed ** Tags removed: verification-done -- Could not identify preference: username Could not identify preference: session_key failure yet authed for services https://bugs.launch

[Bug 569543] Re: Could not identify preference: username Could not identify preference: session_key failure yet authed for services

2010-05-04 Thread Niko Ehrenfeuchter
Ah well, my mistake. There is no changelog available yet through "aptitude" since http://changelogs.ubuntu.com/changelogs/pool/main/g/gwibber/ only has changelogs for the "0ubuntu2" version. Looking into the .diff.gz from http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/g/gwibber/gwibber_2.30.0.1-0ubunt

[Bug 569543] Re: Could not identify preference: username Could not identify preference: session_key failure yet authed for services

2010-05-04 Thread Niko Ehrenfeuchter
Magnus, I'm pretty sure this is still the old package (I ran into the same issue earlier today). "aptitude changelog gwibber" shows nothing about this bug, so we probably have to be patient until the new package is ready... -- Could not identify preference: username Could not identify preference