Copying the comment i made to the bug report in debian:
The problem here is that the package automatically configures inetd when the
user enable the
"server". Splitting into two different packages as suggested in the bug
thread on ubuntu makes no sense because the server part actually is none
** Attachment added: "chksslkey"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/14524452/chksslkey
--
allow hosts to be checked remote
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/230547
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: openssl-blacklist
The current version of openssl-blacklist can only check locally against
the server key. This makes the tool unsuitable for masschecking hosts of
your own, your customers etc. I attach a shell script which uses your
tables to check hosts
Oh, and you write "If you're willing to generate patches of your own,
we'll consider maintaining them as long as they've also been submitted
upstream.". Now, i would send the patch upstream but unfortunately you
don't state the source of the xen patch used in your package. So i
can't.
--
unresolv
I strongly disagree with the way this bug was (not) handled. This is
likely also a bug with the "binary" package linux-source-2.6.22 which is
included in your main distribution. The intended (and sole) usage of
this package (which is also stated in the description) is to allow the
user to create ke
