Robert, since you're not interested in the opinions of non-lawyers, and
since I am not a lawyer, it stands to reason that you would not be
interested in any examples I might offer.
Presumably Canonical employs lawyers who can advise them that "All
Rights Reserved" means "All Rights Reserved", and
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=354622;msg=39
--
Some components are non-free
https://launchpad.net/bugs/83118
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
James, you're overthinking the problem. I'm sure trademark law is very
interesting, and its intersection with open source is a fascinating
topic for someone's PhD thesis, but it is not the topic at hand. The
difference between mysql-query-browser and firefox is very, very simple:
MySQL's icons ar
Some people may be surprised to learn that I disagree with Noah on this
one. I think following Debian's lead would be too disruptive in three
ways:
1. Disruptive to end users, who wouldn't understand why their browser
was renamed out from under them
2. Disruptive to Canonical, who would be force
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: firefox
This is NOT a duplicate of bug 22639. It is about the recently
committed fix for bug 68180. The official Firefox icons are not
available under an open source license.
Steps to reproduce:
1. Open Firefox
2. Type "about:license" and click Go
3.
