[Bug 2075542] Re: bind9 1:9.18.28-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 breakes local system

2024-08-06 Thread M. Mustermann
@Manus: Definitively not! Moving of the binaries happened through the newly installed bind9 package, and all my configuration issues could be solved by following the advices in the bind9 configurations. I had to set some new options and change the value of other options, where now certain precon

[Bug 2075542] Re: bind9 1:9.18.28-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 breakes local system

2024-08-03 Thread M. Mustermann
The most important question for me is still: Why does such a version jump occur during the last months of a LTS version? In a parallel installed debian 11, I am still on bind 9.16, this received the last patch from the isc-bind team-member Ondřej Surý at Thu, 25 Jul 2024 21:51:33 + See: htt

[Bug 1492212] Re: postinst should validate config before restarting bind

2024-08-02 Thread M. Mustermann
100% agreement, that such an installation verification is needed. #2075542 the bad upgrade from (1:9.18.28-0ubuntu0.20.04.1) over (1:9.16.48-0ubuntu0.20.04.1) killed my dns server, because of many config errors. I really would expect, that such a test is performed for every mission critical appl

[Bug 2075542] Re: bind9 1:9.18.28-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 breakes local system

2024-08-01 Thread M. Mustermann
** Summary changed: - bind9 1:9.18.28-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 brakes local system + bind9 1:9.18.28-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 breakes local system ** Description changed: Using ubuntu 20.04 LTS 5.4.0-190-generic #210-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jul 5 17:03:38 UTC 2024 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux - I installed today

[Bug 2075542] [NEW] bind9 1:9.18.28-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 brakes local system

2024-08-01 Thread M. Mustermann
Public bug reported: Using ubuntu 20.04 LTS 5.4.0-190-generic #210-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jul 5 17:03:38 UTC 2024 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux I installed today an update for bind9 (1:9.18.28-0ubuntu0.20.04.1) over (1:9.16.48-0ubuntu0.20.04.1) which killed my existing configuration. The following bin