Any chance the fix gets backported to Raring? Evince is hella sluggish
on my 50+ pages of LaTeX'd research notes.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/943195
Title:
xpdf.real crashed with S
!! Thanks a lot — this has been driving me nuts :-)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/483455
Title:
[ghci] HOME, END, DELETE and BACKSPACE keys input garbage instead of
being interpret
This also breaks Eclipse *as packaged by Ubuntu*, since the profiling
tools require a native binary that gets linked against libstdc++5.
So it's not even sufficient to avoid non-Ubuntu applications to be safe
from the repercussions of this decision. Moreover, I suspect a lot of
people are affected
It's a particularly nasty policy violation, given that AFAICT there is
no longer any way for the user to override /usr/lib/eclipse/eclipse.ini
using anything in ~/.eclipse/ . Neither ~/.eclipse/eclipserc (as claimed
by the eclipse manpage) nor ~/.eclipse/eclipse.ini is honored these days
(a bit of
Just did some Googling, and it looks like the key for me was that I used
fdisk to fix the partition order. Did you ever do that on that disk?
Reportedly it screws up parted ... good to know ...
Ah! Just now tried deleting the last partition with fdisk and
reallocating it. Seems it really was too c
!! I thought to try installing Jaunty instead and upgrading to Karmic,
but I found the problem is still there in the Jaunty installer's
partitioner. What's more, on the Jaunty LiveCD, gparted has the same
problem! Is that any kind of hint?
(If I run parted in the terminal and try to list partition
I'm seeing exactly the same symptoms on regular (non-K) Ubuntu, only I'd
just partitioned the disk using gparted (and fdisk, to fix the partition
order). Also, I've got Windows XP running on an NTFS partition (which
I'd just resized). I can attach those logs if it'd help.
Is there a workaround? I'
Huh. My system's also a single-core Athlon 64, and I'm getting it even
worse (a single "rm" hangs). Is it possible that this is a race
condition that's *more* likely on a single-core box? Seems like we've
exhausted every other theory :-)
--
Soft lockups (freezes) when deleting files from ext4 par
Roland Dreier wrote:
>
> Luke Maurer wrote:
> > I've been able to reproduce it 100% reliably (rm a single file => crashy
> > crashy) just in the Jaunty
> > LiveCD environment. AFAIK, the most exotic filesystem hackery it uses is
> > that union filesystem,
On Sun, 2009-07-05 at 23:32 +, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> We might have a break in this bug. For those people who can reliably
> reproduce the problem, are you using ecryptfs, possibly extensively?
I've been able to reproduce it 100% reliably (rm a single file => crashy
crashy) just in the Jaunty
@Ulrich: Are you sure none of those operations involved deleting files?
The usual symptom is that the system hangs *after* the rm is successful,
so that's not out of character. SVN does some amount of file-based
locking, IIUC, which means at some point it has to rm the lock file.
Creating a tarball
I'm seeing a rather bizarre variant of this. I just upgraded my
masquerading home server to Intrepid, and now browsing from the server
itself works fine, but browsing from *other* machines does not,
including both my Intrepid desktop machine and my iPhone. Very similar
symptoms - if I'm reading tsh
Ugh ... my bad. It's a userspace problem; I just booted into the Hardy
kernel and it's still broken ... so nevermind.
--
TCP option ordering in 2.6.27 is not interoperable with some network equipment
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/264019
You received this bug notification because you are a membe
I'd also like to add that MacOS X allows a choice of behaviors; out of
the box, they're special keys by default (after all, they were designed
for Mac use, and there's an Exposé key and a Dashboard key to prove it),
but that can be turned off, and the MacBook fanatics I know have set
them to being
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: swi-prolog
Gutsy's packaging is missing the CHR library:
?- use_module(library(chr)).
ERROR: source_sink `library(chr)' does not exist
This seems similar to #81561 and #90031; the latter, if not the former
as well, is inherited from Debian's packaging.
Anyone know if this is fixed by the upstream beta 2 release?
--
Ugly gtk theme buttons in web content in Granparadiso
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/160942
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing li
Oh, uh ... yeah. Looks like this happened without my needing to whine
about it :-) Sorry about the spam.
** Changed in: coq (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
Please sync Coq 8.1pl1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/138222
You received this bug notification because you are a memb
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: coq
Current Debian unstable version is 8.1.pl1+dfsg-1 (just a version bump
from 8.1+dfsg-6).
** Affects: coq (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
Please sync Coq 8.1pl1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/138222
You received this bug
FWIW, I'm having the same problem, but a different reason for not liking
the static configuration solution: My keyboard's got a scroll wheel, so
it's both keyboard and pointer. Yes, I *can* set this up statically, but
it's far more sensible to avoid the keyboard/mouse dichotomy in the
first place.
FWIW, I'm having the same problem, but a different reason for not liking
the static configuration solution: My keyboard's got a scroll wheel, so
it's both keyboard and pointer. Yes, I *can* set this up statically, but
it's far more sensible to avoid the keyboard/mouse dichotomy in the
first place.
So, I take it Feisty is shipping with this bug still open? There're
gonna be a lot of people wondering why all the Apache2/SSL tutorials are
broken ...
--
apache2-ssl-certificate has gone missing in feisty
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/77675
You received this bug notification because you are a
(er, they both do ... just the vlc one's twice as big for some reason)
--
VLC crashes when seeking in a mkv file
https://launchpad.net/bugs/78103
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
This one has a core dump (not sure why only it does, but there it is).
** Attachment added: "vlc crash file, with core dump"
http://librarian.launchpad.net/5789314/_usr_bin_vlc.1000.crash
--
VLC crashes when seeking in a mkv file
https://launchpad.net/bugs/78103
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
I get the same error, with the same versions, but on an AMD64 box; also,
it always segfaults the very first time I try to seek. I'm attaching two
crash files: One is from wxvlc, the other from vlc (same problem).
** Attachment added: "wxvlc crash file"
http://librarian.launchpad.net/5789308/_us
I just found that if I comment out the *Bits settings and instead
specify a device by name, it runs happily (though that's not my
preferred solution).
--
Unresolved symbol "set_bit" in evdev_drv.so crashes X (fixed upstream)
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79347
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bu
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: xserver-xorg-input-evdev
If I have xorg.conf set to use evdev, X fails to run, giving this error:
/usr/bin/X11/X: symbol lookup error:
/usr/lib/xorg/modules/input/evdev_drv.so: undefined symbol: set_bit
My evdev settings are these:
Section "InputDevice
Tom's instructions worked for me.
BTW, in bug #68380 it's suggested that this fix be "run by the release
team" to "get it into edgy-proposed" - anyone know how to get that
particular ball rolling?
--
Eclipse will not start (Edgy)
https://launchpad.net/bugs/68053
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubu
27 matches
Mail list logo
