[Bug 1951478] [NEW] lldb --python-path prints the worng path

2021-11-18 Thread Lawrence D';Anna
Public bug reported: lldb --python-path prints the wrong path. It prints /usr/lib/lib/python3/dist-packages, but it should be /usr/lib/python3/dist-package or perhaps /usr/lib/llvm-13/lib/python3/dist-packages/ This is because debian packaging scripts built it with -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=/

[Bug 1951477] [NEW] lldb --python-path prints the worng path

2021-11-18 Thread Lawrence D';Anna
Public bug reported: lldb --python-path prints the wrong path. It prints /usr/lib/lib/python3/dist-packages, but it should be /usr/lib/python3/dist-package or perhaps /usr/lib/llvm-13/lib/python3/dist-packages/ This is because debian packaging scripts built it with -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=/

[Bug 1904641] Re: bizare btrfs bug

2020-11-17 Thread Lawrence D';Anna
the bug also does not occur in 5.8.0-29-generic, so i suppose it was already fixed somewhere. I had to install that manually -- I'm not sure why apt didn't upgrade me to that if it was available. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed

[Bug 1904641] Re: bizare btrfs bug

2020-11-17 Thread Lawrence D';Anna
strace output from btrfs subvol show /data ** Attachment added: "good-trace.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1904641/+attachment/5435320/+files/good-trace.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubunt

[Bug 1904641] Re: bizare btrfs bug

2020-11-17 Thread Lawrence D';Anna
strace output from btrfs subvol show /data | cat ** Attachment added: "bad-trace.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1904641/+attachment/5435319/+files/bad-trace.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to U

[Bug 1904641] [NEW] bizare btrfs bug

2020-11-17 Thread Lawrence D';Anna
Public bug reported: synopsis: root@odin:/home/lawrence_danna# btrfs subvol show /data/ / Name: UUID: 853d0925-fafc-4b69-9efa-b970fb93a419 Parent UUID:- Received UUID: - Creation time: 2020-

[Bug 1592461] Re: btrfs related kernel threads blocked and not making progress

2016-06-16 Thread Lawrence D';Anna
i take it back. this is not fixed in the upstream.As soon as i tried to uninstall the upstream kernel deb the bug reproduced. ** Tags removed: kernel-fixed-upstream ** Tags added: kernel-bug-exists-upstream -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, whi

[Bug 1592461] Re: btrfs related kernel threads blocked and not making progress

2016-06-16 Thread Lawrence D';Anna
tested on upstream kernel: Linux odin 4.7.0-040700rc1-generic #201606100619 SMP Fri Jun 10 10:21:32 UTC 2016 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux The bug appears to be fixed upstream. ** Tags added: kernel-fixed-upstream ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Confirmed -- You r

[Bug 1592461] [NEW] btrfs related kernel threads blocked and not making progress

2016-06-14 Thread Lawrence D';Anna
Public bug reported: I'm seeing messages like this in dmesg: [ 2400.951071] INFO: task btrfs-cleaner:325 blocked for more than 120 seconds. [ 2400.958293] Not tainted 4.4.0-24-generic #43-Ubuntu [ 2400.963918] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. [ 240

[Bug 1045899] Re: Maximum number of clients reached

2012-11-13 Thread Lawrence D';Anna
I was also using two monitors when I observed this bug. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1045899 Title: Maximum number of clients reached To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1045899] [NEW] Maximum number of clients reached

2012-09-04 Thread Lawrence D';Anna
Public bug reported: After repeatedly using nitrogen to set my background picture, the X11 server ceases to accept new connections. xlib reports "Maximum number of clients reached". nitrogen does not show up in ps or xlsclients. xlsclients reports only 18 clients. I filed it under xorg because

[Bug 1045899] Re: Maximum number of clients reached

2012-09-04 Thread Lawrence D';Anna
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1045899 Title: Maximum number of clients reached To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg/+bug/10458

[Bug 1039673] Re: window resize is crazy-slow

2012-08-22 Thread Lawrence D';Anna
NB: everything else (alt-tab, workspace switcher, scale, etc) is all quite snappy and responsive. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1039673 Title: window resize is crazy-slow To manage

[Bug 1039673] Re: window resize is crazy-slow

2012-08-22 Thread Lawrence D';Anna
** Attachment added: "/proc/cpuinfo" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/1039673/+attachment/3271753/+files/cpuinfo -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1039673 Title:

[Bug 1039673] Re: window resize is crazy-slow

2012-08-22 Thread Lawrence D';Anna
** Attachment added: "glxinfo" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/1039673/+attachment/3271752/+files/glxinfo -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1039673 Title: windo

[Bug 1039673] Re: window resize is crazy-slow

2012-08-21 Thread Lawrence D';Anna
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1039673 Title: window resize is crazy-slow To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/1039673/+

[Bug 1039673] [NEW] window resize is crazy-slow

2012-08-21 Thread Lawrence D';Anna
Public bug reported: Moving a window with alt-drag is responsive and easy to use.It can be accomplished in one fluid motion, with no noticiable latency. Resizeing with alt-drag is crazy slow. I'd guess it takes about 500ms between when you depress the middle mouse button and when the orange