[Bug 1913961] Re: impossible to adjust the brightness after upgrading the kernel to version 5.8 (hwe)

2021-02-16 Thread LE POITTEVIN
Update : I can adjust the brightness again after a sleep mode. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1913961 Title: impossible to adjust the brightness after upgrading the kernel to versio

[Bug 1913961] Re: impossible to adjust the brightness after upgrading the kernel to version 5.8 (hwe)

2021-02-16 Thread LE POITTEVIN
update : same things with 5.8.0.43.49. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1913961 Title: impossible to adjust the brightness after upgrading the kernel to version 5.8 (hwe) To manage n

[Bug 1913961] Re: impossible to adjust the brightness after upgrading the kernel to version 5.8 (hwe)

2021-01-31 Thread LE POITTEVIN
** Also affects: fedora Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1913961 Title: impossible to adjust the brightness after upgrading the kernel to v

[Bug 1913961] [NEW] impossible to adjust the brightness after upgrading the kernel to version 5.8 (hwe)

2021-01-31 Thread LE POITTEVIN
Public bug reported: It is impossible for me to adjust the screen brightness using the slider in the Gnome menu, nor in the energy settings. I'm on Ubuntu 20.04.2, the Nvidia 450.102.04 drivers with an xorg session (no .conf file in /etc/X11/) I have an Imac 27" end2013. This happened after the

[Bug 1872476] Re: Shared files are shown as folders

2020-04-30 Thread LE POITTEVIN
Same observation, my NAS is in smb1, idem for my router with a USB disk. The files are seen as folders. You can neither read the files nor delete them. The same folder mounted in CIFS by fstab is seen correctly. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which

[Bug 1875354] Re: No more smb access after migration to UBUNTU 20.04 from UBUNTU 19.10

2020-04-28 Thread LE POITTEVIN
smbclient //192.168.1.1/USB1 --option='client min protocol=NT1' Enter WORKGROUP\laurent's password: Try "help" to get a list of possible commands. smb: \> I just added "client min protocol=NT1" to my /etc/samba/smb.conf and it works again. Thanks to all of you for your help and sorry, as Stefan

[Bug 1875354] Re: No more smb access after migration to UBUNTU 20.04 from UBUNTU 19.10

2020-04-28 Thread LE POITTEVIN
indeed I have just checked and my router however relatively recent still uses smb1. "Morbius1 (morbius1) ", According to what you say, I could not access my NAS or my router any more than a CIFS mount? it's a pity, even under windows one can force, even if it is not recommendable from a security p

[Bug 1875354] Re: No more smb access after migration to UBUNTU 20.04 from UBUNTU 19.10

2020-04-28 Thread LE POITTEVIN
Thank you for your help but I only indicated some tests I had done after internet research before posting here. Anyway, despite the changes in the smb.conf that I mentioned at the beginning of my post, especially concerning the smb1 protocol, smbclient doesn't work. As I said before posting the

[Bug 1875354] Re: No more smb access after migration to UBUNTU 20.04 from UBUNTU 19.10

2020-04-28 Thread LE POITTEVIN
In response to the error "Unknown parameter encountered: ", bind interfaces only"... Ignoring unknown parameter ", bind interfaces only", I corrected the typo and I'll send you my smb.conf just in case. ** Attachment added: "smb.conf" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gvfs/+bug/18753

[Bug 1875354] Re: No more smb access after migration to UBUNTU 20.04 from UBUNTU 19.10

2020-04-28 Thread LE POITTEVIN
I confirm that it still works with ubuntu 19.10 up to date. However, I can't navigate in the windows network. The folder remains empty. The access by smb://IP/folder works, as well as smbclient //IP/folder but smbtree tells me "Unable to initialise messaging context" but this seems to be normal g

[Bug 1875354] Re: No more smb access after migration to UBUNTU 20.04 from UBUNTU 19.10

2020-04-28 Thread LE POITTEVIN
Sorry, I got confused with smb://. ...I've been doing a lot of tests because I'm not getting the same feedback: laurent@laurent-iMac:~$ smbclient //192.168.1.1/USB1 Unknown parameter encountered: ", bind interfaces only" Ignoring unknown parameter ", bind interfaces only" protocol negotiation fai

[Bug 1875354] Re: No more smb access after migration to UBUNTU 20.04 from UBUNTU 19.10

2020-04-28 Thread LE POITTEVIN
IP of my pc : 192.168.1.10 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1875354 Title: No more smb access after migration to UBUNTU 20.04 from UBUNTU 19.10 To manage notifications about this bug g

[Bug 1875354] Re: No more smb access after migration to UBUNTU 20.04 from UBUNTU 19.10

2020-04-28 Thread LE POITTEVIN
Thank you for coming back. So I'm going to start from a good base and delete what I did. laurent@laurent-iMac:~$ pkill gvfs; pkill nautilus pkill: le pid 1184 n'a pu être tué: Opération non permise pkill: le pid 1199 n'a pu être tué: Opération non permise pkill: le pid 1204 n'a pu être tué: Opérat

[Bug 1875354] Re: No more smb access after migration to UBUNTU 20.04 from UBUNTU 19.10

2020-04-27 Thread LE POITTEVIN
modified the source package attributed to this bug ** Package changed: ubuntu => gvfs (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1875354 Title: No more smb access after migration to UBU

[Bug 1875354] [NEW] No more smb access after migration to UBUNTU 20.04 from UBUNTU 19.10

2020-04-27 Thread LE POITTEVIN
Public bug reported: Hello everyone, I no longer have access to my devices (NAS and other pcs - windows) from Nautilus. The command smb://IP address doesn't work anymore since the upgrade. some tests : 1 I tried to change the parameter "client max protocol = NT1" in client max protocol = NT1 si