Public bug reported:
I installed Ubuntu Intrepid Beta from CD. I was able to setup nVidia on
it, by installing the nvidia driver from Ubuntu repository. However, it
is not fully functional. Direct rendering does not work. It worked on
Hardy, but does not work in Intrepid. Some OpenGL applications
I installed the Intrepid beta from Install CD because upgrade from
Hardy->Intrepid failed on the nVidia driver - there was absolutely no
way to get X up again (even the nVidia site drivers did not work because
Ubuntu screws up the nVidia kernel modules so that the nVidia
installer's compiled kernel
Oops, this was about wifi, my issue here is the eth0 which does not
work. Indeed, the wifi works neither, in my case, it connects to a
network succesfully sometimes, but then disconnects after 1 minute or
so. It was doing already in Hardy this for me, and I have been using the
wired network because
I just finished installing Intrepid beta. Same problem here, there is
absolutely no way to up the eth0 on Thinkpad T61p, there is no driver.
This has worked before on the same machine on all previous Ubuntu
versions that have been installed on the T61p (Gutsy, Hardy), so I think
this is a serious
I have the same problem on Ubuntu Hardy and Lenovo Thinkpad T61p.
I need to use the serial cable to do my work, but minicom exits before
displaying anything and says that device /dev/ttyS0 disappeared.
dmesg prints the following:
[435438.377880] ttyS0: LSR safety check engaged!
[435446.329923] tt
The low-spec card is supposed to support this resolution via DVI because
I have identical chip on identical laptop running Windows (well, it is
not mine, but the company's) and it runs the Cinema Display fine with no
problems at all.
I am now running Gutsy and this problem still persists and it is
Public bug reported:
I have been keeping my Gutsy up-to-date. However, Today dist-upgrade reported
errors on packages:
apport
apport-gtk
eog
evolution-common
gnome-panel-data
gnome-panel
synaptic
update-manager
Here is the log of apt-get dist-upgrade:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/karoliina#
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 91556 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/91556
Additional findings about the resolution:
- After getting everything to work, I have had to edit configuration files from
several applications and games by hand since their configuration does not
generally inc
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 91556 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/91556
The very same thing happens with stable Feisty Fawn, with GeForce 8800GTX the
Feisty Fawn is broken by default.
I have Club3D GeForce 8800GTX 768 MB + 30 inch Dell 2560x1600 resolution
display. There are num
So my temporary fix for continuing running the scratchbox is to use 2.6.20-6
-kernel.
Any news on this? This affects every Maemo developer running Feisty.
--
(maemo-on-ubuntu) Scratchbox does not work with latest Feisty kernel image
https://launchpad.net/bugs/86457
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
Latest update about the situation:
- I tried your suggestion and it didn't help. The image is still distorted and
unreadable. The laptop was last time dist-upgraded on last Friday, so the
Feisty is pretty much up to date and so this occurs even with the latest
version of the open source driver.
Hi,
I have since updated the system many times and not tried to update with
update manager again. So the /var/log/dist-upgrade is no longer valid I
think.
Best Wishes,
Karoliina
--
Update Manager's dist-upgrade to from Edgy to Feisty failed
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79536
--
ubuntu-bugs mail
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: linux-image-2.6.20-8-generic
Feisty kernel image 2.6.20.8.4 prevents running Scratchbox (r4 Apophis)
(Scratchbox stopped working after
dist-upgrade last week). Here is what the Scratchbox complains:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/scratchbox$ ./login
Welcome to Scra
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 60621 ***
2560x1600 would be really good to have support since (also) I have a 30
inch widescreen monitor at home.
Also would be a very good idea to take in account HTPC users which are using
"HD-Ready" video projectors and
LCD televisions, which have the mediu
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: update-manager
I have a fresh installation of Ubuntu Edgy, had to reinstall the system as the
Feisty to refused to boot up after
one dist-upgrade. Ok, I reinstalled edgy and started to proceed with
dist-upgrade to feisty:
I changed sources.list to point
Here is the original video file.
** Attachment added: "Video of the bug occurring with Apple Cinema Display"
http://librarian.launchpad.net/5396027/atidrivercinemadisplay.mp4
--
ATI Open source driver shows distorted unreadable image on Dell laptop + Apple
Cinema Display 23 inch
https://lau
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: xserver-xorg-driver-ati
SOFTWARE
Ubuntu Feisty, 14.12.2006. See DESCRIPTION for xorg.conf settings.
HARDWARE
Dell Latitude D600 laptop + docking station + Apple Cinema HD Display connected
to the laptop using DVI connector.
DESCRIPTION
This has never w
Cool. Yes, it is downside of most distributions and also other operating
systems that the background images
are usually supplied with a crappy resolution.
I am using 23 inch Apple Cinema HD Display at work and will soon be using 30
inch Dell 3007WFP at home (as soon as it arrives from Dell, plac
Oops, I didn't notice that there was already a reply from C.Kontros.
Please disregard my above comments.
--
Ardour 2 is (nearly) finished
https://launchpad.net/bugs/73900
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
But remember, I am not part of Ubuntu Studio Development team, so I am
not the person who is making the decision of its inclusion or not
including it, so please do not take my positive comments about Ardour 2
versus Ardour 1 as any commitment for taking it.
--
Ardour 2 is (nearly) finished
https:
I have tried Ardour 2 on Jacklab (compiled by myself). It appears to
work and I would prefer to use it rather than the Ardour 1.
--
Ardour 2 is (nearly) finished
https://launchpad.net/bugs/73900
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/u
There is one thing though (IMHO):
- the orange ones (screenshot above) look stylish and professional
- the old ones look unprofessional
I think the fact that they are ugly has nothing to do with their usability and
usability of stylish
graphics should be improved instead of replacing the new styl
22 matches
Mail list logo
