[Bug 1134974] Re: compiz and other display misbehavior on HD4000 after xatracker/mesa components upgraded to 9.0.2-0ubuntu0.1

2013-03-08 Thread Jim Hill
Switching to a Radeon 6670 GPU also eliminates the misbehavior. ** Summary changed: - compiz and other display misbehavior after xatracker/mesa components upgraded to 9.0.2-0ubuntu0.1 + compiz and other display misbehavior on HD4000 after xatracker/mesa components upgraded to 9.0.2-0ubuntu0.1

[Bug 1134974] Re: compiz and other display misbehavior after xatracker/mesa components upgraded to 9.0.2-0ubuntu0.1

2013-03-04 Thread Jim Hill
I'm using the HD4000 graphics on my Ivy Bridge 3570, which might not be apparent from the hardware report. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1134974 Title: compiz and other display misbe

[Bug 1134974] Re: compiz and other display misbehavior after xatracker/mesa components upgraded to 9.0.2-0ubuntu0.1

2013-02-27 Thread Jim Hill
** Summary changed: - compiz and other display misbehavior after recent upgrade + compiz and other display misbehavior after xatracker/mesa components upgraded to 9.0.2-0ubuntu0.1 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https

[Bug 1134974] [NEW] compiz and other display misbehavior after recent upgrade

2013-02-27 Thread Jim Hill
Public bug reported: After a recent upgrade the unity launcher autohide lost transparency and other programs began apparently hanging. I saw these upgrade lines in dpkg.log: 2013-02-27 15:14:16 upgrade libgl1-mesa-dri:i386 9.0.2-0ubuntu0.1 9.0-0ubuntu1 2013-02-27 15:14:18 upgrade libgl1-mesa-dri

[Bug 467355] Re: karmic boot fails with root partition data=ordered in fstab

2010-02-13 Thread Jim Hill
I set the on-disk mount option to data=ordered long ago and everything worked again, I'm guessing everyone else who ever cared found that answer too so I don't suppose this is worth any further consideration. I picked "invalid" from the list since the actual behavior was intended if inconvenient.

[Bug 289736] Re: [Intrepid] gnome lockup after login

2010-02-13 Thread Jim Hill
** Changed in: ubuntu Status: Incomplete => Fix Released -- [Intrepid] gnome lockup after login https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/289736 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.

[Bug 467355] Re: karmic boot fails with root partition data=ordered in fstab

2009-10-31 Thread Jim Hill
okay, so I found the change (bbae8bcc49bc4d002221dab52c79a50a82e7cd1f) in fs/ext3/super.c I guess the only thing I could ask for now is a hint as to why the obvious patch below would cause problems. I figure there has to be a good (and obvious to those who know their way around ext3) reason, I'd

[Bug 289736] Re: [Intrepid] gnome lockup after login

2009-10-31 Thread Jim Hill
So far as I'm concerned you can close this. The webcam didn't kill gnome on Jaunty and doesn't on Karmic. -- [Intrepid] gnome lockup after login https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/289736 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- u

[Bug 467355] Re: karmic boot fails with root partition data=ordered in fstab

2009-10-31 Thread Jim Hill
** Attachment added: "AlsaDevices.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34807290/AlsaDevices.txt ** Attachment added: "AplayDevices.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34807292/AplayDevices.txt ** Attachment added: "ArecordDevices.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34807294/ArecordDevices.t

[Bug 467355] [NEW] karmic boot fails with root partition data=ordered in fstab

2009-10-31 Thread Jim Hill
Public bug reported: My jaunty fstab had all partitions mounted data=ordered. After the karmic upgrade boot dropped me into busybox, df and /proc/mounts reported different mounts. /proc/mount said / was mounted ro,data=writeback and refused to remount it rw,data=ordered. So I manually remounted

[Bug 289736] Re: [Intrepid] gnome lockup after login

2009-02-27 Thread Jim Hill
It is, and a possible workaround occurred to me after many weeks: I unplugged my webcam, which I could never get working right anyway and had given up on and forgotten. lsusb says: Bus 003 Device 004: ID 046d:0990 Logitech, Inc. QuickCam Pro 9000 I'm sorry I didn't update the bug. I won't be abl

[Bug 289736] Re: gnome lockup after login

2008-10-26 Thread Jim Hill
** Description changed: Intrepid installed via `update-manager -d` from Hardy, mouse and keyboard completely lock up after entering password but before desktop - background appears. Happens every time. + background appears. Happens every time, can't reach consoles, have to + 5-second salute.

[Bug 289736] [NEW] gnome lockup after login

2008-10-26 Thread Jim Hill
Public bug reported: Intrepid installed via `update-manager -d` from Hardy, mouse and keyboard completely lock up after entering password but before desktop background appears. Happens every time. I saw others report that removing network-manager or compiz would work, or retrying would eventuall

[Bug 213011] Re: Athlon X2 Dual Core Processor - Second CPU/Core not working with i386 kernel

2008-05-31 Thread Jim Hill
Both of my systems are currently running: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ uname -a Linux jim-desktop 2.6.24-17-generic #1 SMP Thu May 1 14:31:33 UTC 2008 i686 GNU/Linux -- Athlon X2 Dual Core Processor - Second CPU/Core not working with i386 kernel https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/213011 You received this b

[Bug 213011] Re: Athlon X2 Dual Core Processor - Second CPU/Core not working with i386 kernel

2008-05-27 Thread Jim Hill
I'm attaching the output. Unfortunately, the systems no longer exhibit the behavior. Either something in the last several patches has fixed the issue, or I have inadvertently changed some configuration. I've been accepting updates; however, I hadn't actually checked to see if the issue remained

[Bug 213011] Re: Athlon X2 Dual Core Processor - Second CPU/Core not working with i386 kernel

2008-05-19 Thread Jim Hill
Offering this as it may help diagnose this issue. I have it operating BOTH ways on two identical systems. System #1. Dell Inspiron 531s, Factory setup, 1 GB RAM, Processor name string: AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 4000+. It reports only 1 CPU responding, (using system monitor) This

[Bug 229632] Re: ntpd should run niced

2008-05-12 Thread Jim Hill
** Attachment added: "Run ntpd at nice -8" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/14475229/ntp.init.d.ntp.nice-8.patch -- ntpd should run niced https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/229632 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-

[Bug 229632] [NEW] ntpd should run niced

2008-05-12 Thread Jim Hill
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: ntp In ntp-4.2.4p4+dfsg debian/ntp.init starts ntpd with no special priority (I believe this is not new). If the system is busy at all when ntpd polls the jitter goes way up, and ntpd gets nervous and drops the poll times (it's been a while since I saw

[Bug 223382] [NEW] Embarrassing spelling error in hardy example-content v31 Examples/case_howard_county_library.pdf

2008-04-27 Thread Jim Hill
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: example-content s/Marylan/Maryland/ in the first "Background" paragraph on p. 1 ... ** Affects: example-content (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Embarrassing spelling error in hardy example-content v31 Examples/case_howard_c