Hi Derek,
I'm not totally up to speed on the Multi-Arch thing. Is this just changing
a field in the control file? What's the benefit? Any downside?
I saw a similar bug on Debian's bugtracker, that didn't make sense to me.
Happy to be educated.
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=9
This is done.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1816304
Title:
Several issues due to version 4 beta while the final 4.0.0 has been
released
To manage notifications about this bug go t
Tesseract is updated - so done.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1777388
Title:
Openalpr segfault in libtesseract provided in Bionic
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https
This is done.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1802334
Title:
update tesseract-ocr to 4.0.0 stable
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+sour
I think all this was fixed with Ubuntu 16.10. Nothing I can do to help
with 16.04.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1548250
Title:
package libtesseract4 not installed failed to instal
Thanks for the report. I don't suppose you'd be interested in revising
the manpage yourself and contributing? (Never hurts to ask)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1481013
Title:
tesse
matapackage tesseract-ocr-all has been added
** Changed in: tesseract (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/726373
Title:
[needs-packaging] nee
can't do much without image to reproduce
** Changed in: tesseract (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/284397
Title:
tesseract crashed with SIGSEG
suspect fixed due to shipping newer code
** Changed in: tesseract (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/435997
Title:
wordlist2dawg segfaults on
upstream bug appears to still be open
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1010577
Title:
tesseract fails to train/OCR with certain numbers 6, 8, 9, 0
To manage notifications about this bu
fixed as indicated in debian bug
** Changed in: tesseract (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1094145
Title:
tesseract-ocr: produces invalid-UT
Fixed in 3.04.00
# dpkg -L libtesseract-dev | grep pc
/usr/lib/pkgconfig/tesseract.pc
** Changed in: tesseract (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/b
Fixed in two ways. First, tesseract-ocr depends on tesseract-ocr-eng.
Second, I just shipped new code with 3.04.00.
** Changed in: tesseract (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubu
This problem was resolved in Ubuntu 14.10 and later. Sorry for the
glitch, totally my fault.
** Changed in: tesseract (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launc
This bug is very likely obsolete; Tesseract v2 was a long time ago, and
image handling has changed massively since then.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/284397
Title:
tesseract crashed
There is a long story here, but I won't bore you with it. Resolved as of
3.04.00 which is an official upstream release.
** Changed in: tesseract (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubunt
1) There is no longer a need to install manually because Tesseract 3 now
ships with Ubuntu.
2) Manual installation bugs can be reported to upstream. But I recommend
just using the packages.
http://code.google.com/p/tesseract-ocr/issues/list
** Changed in: tesseract (Ubuntu)
Status: New =>
Also, Ocropus is no longer shipping.
** Changed in: tesseract (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565688
Title:
tesseract assert failure:
** Changed in: tesseract (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/622021
Title:
tesseract Segmentation fault
To manage notifications about thi
** Changed in: tesseract (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/461177
Title:
tesseract 2.03 generates empty file
To manage notifications about th
** Changed in: tesseract (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/639981
Title:
segfault with tiff
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
htt
** Changed in: leptonlib (Ubuntu)
Status: New => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/988112
Title:
histotest is missing its man page in leptonica-progs
To manage notifi
Obsolete; Tesseract 3 is shipping. Please close.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/639981
Title:
segfault with tiff
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.
Obsolete; Ubuntu now ships Tesseract 3. Please close.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/461177
Title:
tesseract 2.03 generates empty file
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
h
Obsolete. Tesseract 3.x now uses Leptonica for image i/o. Please close.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/622021
Title:
tesseract Segmentation fault
To manage notifications about this b
Obsolete; Tesseract 3 is shipping with Ubuntu. Please close.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565688
Title:
tesseract assert failure: tesseract: unicharset.cpp:76: const
UNICHAR_ID UN
Dan Bloomberg, the author of Leptonica removed histotest. I think he
just wanted to separate the wheat from the chaff. Feel free to contact
him directly if you wish to discuss. The source code for histotest still
exists, it just isn't built or shipped by default.
--
You received this bug notifica
histotest got removed with Leptonica 1.69, the version shipping with
Precise.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/988112
Title:
histotest is missing its man page in leptonica-progs
To man
Stefano, this is beyond fantastic. Just checking - does the sync
include these removals, as mentioned in comment #9?
RM: tesseract-ocr-deu-f -- ROM package renamed to tesseract-ocr-deu-frak
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=660677
RM: tesseract-ocr-dev -- ROM replaced by libtesser
>I'm leaving as New and subscribing the sponsors for you. Comment #9
>shows how to proceed. I'd appreciate a courtesy check that an archive
>administrator doesn't mind performing the work that this will cause, and
>please make sure to watch all changed packages for bug reports.
I'm not sure who "y
(When I said Sikuli is good to go, I mean that it builds, runs, and
upstream is happy. There has not been additional performance tuning.)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/933162
Title:
Good news, the new tesseract has now entered Debian testing.
>I would probably prefer to see this happen in 12.10, in the hope that
>the problems with sikuli and ocropus are resolved in the interim.
Sikuli is good to go. See version 1.0~x~rc3.tesseract3-dfsg1-1 in Debian
Unstable. It is still wai
Trying again with proper formatting.
>I see on the linked Debian bug that sikuli has reported worse
>performance with this new series. Is that not a concern or is their
>usecase no longer as well supported?
Tesseract upstream is in communication with Sikuli upstream. a 10%
drop in recognition pe
>I see on the linked Debian bug that sikuli has reported worse performance with
>this new series.
>Is that not a concern or is their usecase no longer as well supported?
Tesseract upstream is in communication with Sikuli upstream. a 10% drop in
recognition
performance is considered acceptable b
Okay, tesseract_3.02.01-2 has just been uploaded to Debian to include
this patch.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/933162
Title:
Sync tesseract 3.02.01-1 (universe) from Debian sid (mai
>Would it be possible to do a merge or would you like me to do this?
The fix has just been merged into upstream subversion. I will add also
it to Debian right now, as a maintainer patch. Anything else?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subsc
To be 100% clear, this is really a sync request for tesseract-*
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/933162
Title:
Sync tesseract 3.02.01-1 (universe) from Debian sid (main)
To manage noti
since current precise version 2.04-2.1ubuntu2:
tesseract (3.02.01-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream release
* Upstream fixed a segfault (closes: #658634)
* Upstream wrote some missing manpages.
-- Jeff Breidenbach Tue, 14 Feb 2012 18:30:21 -0800
tesseract (3.02-3) unstable; urgenc
Justification:
We would really like Leptonica 1.69 as part of Precise for two reasons.
First, it is a critical support library for the next release of the OCR
engine Tesseract, which has according to popcon has lots of users. That
next Tesseract release will not only improve quality, go from about
Sorry, no computer available for me to test.
--
parted (and possibly cfdisk) creates invalid partition tables
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/198248
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs
Finally found an installation path that works. Never burnt so many CDs
in my life.
8.10 i386 live cd : FREEZE
8.10 amd64 lice cd : FREEZE
8.04 amd64 live cd : FREEZE
8.10 amd64 alternate cd : hangs, but way after paritioning
8.04.1 amd64 alternate cd : SUCCESS
--
starting partitioner freezes ma
This machine is directly attached to the internet; assuming the LiceCD
supports it I'm happy to enable a remote login if anyone wants to poke
around. Or think of this as great excuse to buy an Intel x25-e. (No
idea if the x25-m will have the same problem or not) Web search finds
one similar incide
** Attachment added: "hdparm-and-friends.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/20264713/hdparm-and-friends.txt
--
starting partitioner freezes machine at 50%
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/305793
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
Public bug reported:
Description:
Trying to install a Ubuntu from the LiveCD, I get through the first few
stages and then a dialog appears that days "starting paritioner". It has
a progress bar that zooms to 50% instantly. After about two seconds, the
animated progress bar stops its animation and
That's interesting; I only get the warning when I run the cli64 tool
to query drive status. Regular use of the SATA controller doesn't
trigger any warnings for me, no matter what the load. Probably the
difference is in how we are utilizing the Areca card; I'm just using
a simple passthrough mode an
>have become unusable in 2.6.24.
Besides the annoying warning, what else goes wrong? (I recently reported
duplicate bug #197982)
--
arcmsr + archttp64 calls dma_free_coherent() with irqs disabled - dmesg filled
with warnings
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194207
You received this bug notificat
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: util-linux
cfdisk is apparently putting bad info on disk, but poking
the kernel correctly and directly when making large
partitions. Everything looks fine until the first reboot. I
hear this is a known problem with parted, but want to let
you know cfdis
Public bug reported:
I see this repeatedly in syslog
[ 4074.960149] WARNING: at
/build/buildd/linux-2.6.24/arch/x86/kernel/pci-dma_64.c:169 dma_free_coherent()
[ 4074.960152] Pid: 19831, comm: cli64 Not tainted 2.6.24-8-server #1
[ 4074.960153]
[ 4074.960154] Call Trace:
[ 4074.960157] [] dma_
Works fine on the current Feisty daily CD. Good. You can close the bug.
-Jeff
On 2/15/07, Martin Pitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Jeff,
>
> Jeff Breidenbach [2007-02-15 9:30 -]:
> > I have long since dumped x86-64 and installed i386 edgy because
> > of this
I have long since dumped x86-64 and installed i386 edgy because
of this problem. If you really care, I can run from a live CD and report.
You want me to use edgy? Some feisty beta? Not bother?
No, I can't configure NIC card manually but also wouldn't know where
to start. No kernel module parameters
And here's an example of DHCP working fine on i386 from the live CD.
Both cases are for Edgy.
$ sudo ifup -v eth0
Configuring interface eth0=eth0 (inet)
run-parts --verbose /etc/network/if-pre-up.d
run-parts: executing /etc/network/if-pre-up.d/wireless-tools
run-parts: executing /etc/network/if-p
** Attachment added: "example of amd64 not working"
http://librarian.launchpad.net/4963114/amd64.txt
--
edgy AMD64 dhcp busted
https://launchpad.net/bugs/69175
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: dhcp-client
I upgraded from a working AMD64 dapper to AMD64 edgy. The onboard eth0
(Realtek) no longer could get a IP address assigned. Fiddling around
(pump, if up/down eth0, /etc/init.d/networking restart,etc) all showed
the dhcp broadcast trying again
PS. I don't actually know what/where is causing the problem; the choice
of reporting against dhcp-client is arbitrary. Eth0 is plainly visible
using ifconfig - it just can't get an IP address assigned.
--
edgy AMD64 dhcp busted
https://launchpad.net/bugs/69175
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu
Public bug reported:
I'm the Debian maintainer for leptonlib, and it looks like the recent
1.37-1 package uploaded to sid missed Edgy Eft's freeze date by one day.
Leptonlib is a very new package. Leptonlib cersion 1.37 is not backwards
compatible with 1.36 and I respectfully ask that Edgy ship th
55 matches
Mail list logo
