I can also confirm 24.04 being affected.
Using kernel package linux-generic-hwe-24.04 version 6.11.0-19.19~24.04.1 .
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1947364
Title:
mt76 module disagree
** Package changed: linux (Ubuntu) => fwts
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2100818
Title:
firmware/fwts_server test failed on Ubuntu 24.04.2
To manage notifications about this bug go
I suspect that https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/issues/3305 might
also help a lot there eventually.
** Bug watch added: gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/issues #3305
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/issues/3305
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubu
The pertinent line from .i3status is this:
wireless _first_ {
format_up = "W: (%essid - %quality) %ip"
format_down = "W: down"
}
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2100683
Public bug reported:
from gdb:
i3status: trying to auto-detect output_format setting
i3status: auto-detected "term"
*** buffer overflow
No updates, I did reach out to the Debian maintainer but have not heard
back.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2088250
Title:
[Lenovo Ubuntu 20.04.6&22.04.5 bug] After injecting a memor
We put some time into this but the patches necessary for this do not
cleanly pick into 6.8. As this is a cosmetic issue that is only meant
to change the logging level for certain messages from ERR to WARN, we're
closing this. It can be revisited later if a customer is bothered by
this enough to f
@alexsander and @dan we can get you access to the machine this is
happening on, it is in the server lab and is accessible.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2085818
Title:
Failure to dep
That is now released to stable.
** Changed in: checkbox (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2094285
Title:
cpuid.py lack of 0xa06d1 o
No further updates at this time.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2088250
Title:
[Lenovo Ubuntu 20.04.6&22.04.5 bug] After injecting a memory MCE
error, no error logs were obtained fr
** Bug watch added: gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-calendar/-/issues #160
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-calendar/-/issues/160
** Changed in: gnome-calendar
Importance: Wishlist => Unknown
** Changed in: gnome-calendar
Status: Expired => Unknown
** Changed in: gnome-calendar
Re
I added a plucky task just because P is still on 6.12 so technically
we'd need to pull this into 6.12. However, if Plucky rolls to 6.13 soon
that will not be necessary since this is in mainline at 6.13.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subs
I do not know that there is anything necessary to do here.
Per the discussion for that patch, the warning is just a warning and
while it is probably elevated higher than it should be (the patch only
seems to downgrade it to a DEBUG level message) it is innocuous.
The patch is landed in 6.13, for
Hi Brett,
The Cert requirements are hitting 80% of advertised line rate which is
largely passable even on noisy networks absent issues with drivers or
firmware causing performance issues. In most cases, devices hit 95+
percent so 80 is typically a low bar to meet, but we do occasionally hit
cases
** Summary changed:
- Enable SG/TSO feature backport request for 24.04 server
+ Enable SG/TSO patch backport request for 24.04 server
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2094764
Title:
En
Yes, this has been resolved in development release, I'm not sure yet
when the next release will land in stable but as this has already been
resolved and is just making its way through the release process there's
nothing to really do here.
That said, other than Edge have you tried Beta?
** Changed
> "[…] anything that does not correspond to their vision or is NOT
useful to Gnome ecosystem is doomed to a categorical refusal. […] With
their future plan with GTK 5, and path more oriented to move GTK to a
gnome specific support toolkit […]"
I don't know if that is an accurate depiction.
If tha
Public bug reported:
Hi,
There's very old rhvoice .deb/apt version 1.8 in Ubuntu 24.04.1 repository.
The current version v1.16.
Please update Ubuntu 24.04.1 .deb/apt repository to current version.
Thanks
===
lsb_release -rd
No LSB modules are available.
Description:
There is no further update for now, I am still chasing this internally
to try and get some time allocated to this by the team that the
maintainer is a part of. As this is not something that we have a
business obligation to resolve, finding the time for that is proving
difficult, but I will continu
** Also affects: btrfs-progs (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Description changed:
Hi!
'btrfs receive' ALLOCATES ALL the available space for DATA immediately
right after 'btrfs receive'/BTRBK start.
I did format on target partition with BTRFS.
Started and in
Public bug reported:
Hi!
'btrfs receive' ALLOCATES ALL the available space for DATA immediately
right after 'btrfs receive'/BTRBK start.
I did format on target partition with BTRFS.
Started and interrupted BTRBK/'btrfs receive' after few seconds (on SSD).
Device unallocated: 1.00MiB even though
This issue STILL exists on Ubuntu 24.04.1 Cinnamon!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1834226
Title:
update-notifier doesn't respect "automatically check for updates:
Never"
To manage
I did get this suggestion from someone internally:
+++
That one line in there about unmanaged devices reminds me of this old thing
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager/+bug/1638842 -- loads
of people found our
/usr/lib/NetworkManager/conf.d/10-globally-managed-devices.conf
the schedule at kernel.ubuntu.com shows that this should release this
week unless there's a priority that causes a slip. So unless something
bad happens, the update for 24.04 should be released later this week.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
This is a universe package, and not something we maintain right now, it
is synced from upstream but the versions in each LTS is frozen. I doubt
that we would backport 0.8.1-3 all the way back to 22.04 from Plucky,
but I am checking internally an have pointed folks to this bug to take a
look and see
Is there an ETA on that shim fix, or some way to test it?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2089320
Title:
Secure boot variables full, unable to boot
To manage notifications about this
Fresh install Dell 9370 - Built in screen failed USB Monitor chosen
/usr/lib/systemd/systemd-resolved
systemd-resolved 225.4-1ubunta8.4
crash
systemd-resolved crashed with SIGBART in sd_event_dispatched
2.28.1-Oubuntu3.1
AMD64
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member
Fresh install Dell 9370 - Built in screen failed USB Monitor chosen
/usr/lib/systemd/systemd-resolved
systemd-resolved 225.4-1ubunta8.4
crash
systemd-resolved crashed with SIGBART in sd_event_dispatched
2.28.1-Oubuntu3.1
AMD64
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/kernel-team/2024-November/155642.html
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2089711
Title:
Request to backport mseal syscall to LTS 24.04 LTS GA kernel
To
Status in linux source package in Jammy:
> Triaged
> Status in linux source package in Noble:
> Triaged
>
> Bug description:
> Hello,
>
> My name is Jeff Xu, I work with Stephen Röttger on hardening the
> chrome browser. I'm reaching out to explore the possibilit
** Patch added: "pach 3/4 proc-pid-smaps-add-mseal-info-for-vma"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2089711/+attachment/5840623/+files/0003-proc-pid-smaps-add-mseal-info-for-vma.patch
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is sub
** Patch added: "patch 4/4 mseal-fix-is_madv_discard"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2089711/+attachment/5840624/+files/0004-mseal-fix-is_madv_discard.patch
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
http
** Patch added: "patch 1/4 mseal-wire-up-mseal-syscall"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2089711/+attachment/5840621/+files/0001-mseal-wire-up-mseal-syscall.patch
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
** Patch added: "pach 2/4 mseal-add-mseal-syscall.patch"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2089711/+attachment/5840622/+files/0002-mseal-add-mseal-syscall.patch
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
htt
Public bug reported:
Hello,
My name is Jeff Xu, I work with Stephen Röttger on hardening the chrome
browser. I'm reaching out to explore the possibility of backporting
memory sealing into the 22.04 LTS kernel.
For context, it is worth noting that the Kernel introduces mseal support
in ve
We'll see about pulling this patch for the next SRU cycle (It's on the
list of things to work on this and next week)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2073571
Title:
[Lenovo Ubuntu 24.04
out of curiosity, why is the xe driver being used adn not the i915
driver? As pointed out in comment #7, unless I'm misinterpreting that,
Arrow Lake uses the i915 driver while lunar lake and beyond use xe?
And the link to Phoronix in the summary also mentions the i915 driver
and not the Xe driver
6.12 now in Mainline. Now we need to verify the patch made it to
mainlien and begin pulling it to 6.8 from 6.12.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2073571
Title:
[Lenovo Ubuntu 24.04 Bu
At the moment there is no further update, we are awaiting info on
testing updated firmware.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061373
Title:
[Lenovo Ubuntu 24.04 Bug] Print grub message
Hi, did the new EFI version change anything?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061373
Title:
[Lenovo Ubuntu 24.04 Bug] Print grub message before the uefi POST
screen disappears in Ubu
-122-generic x86_64
AddonCompatCheckDisabled: False
ApportVersion: 2.28.1-0ubuntu3.1
Architecture: amd64
AudioDevicesInUse:
USERPID ACCESS COMMAND
/dev/snd/controlC0: jeff 1518 F pulseaudio
/dev/snd/pcmC0D0p: jeff 1518 F...m pulseaudio
BuildID: 20240903191356
and then I put it in hte wrong place
** Project changed: linux => linux (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2081685
Title:
[Ubuntu 24.04-generic Kernel-6.8]Hard lockup on 8 Socke
looks like this is now upstream according to this:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-scsi/20240912232447.45607-1-justintee8...@gmail.com/T/#m0c5162512ab2bd5cabf2135596cfc64de068f3f9
in particular this patch was called out:
[PATCH 6/8] lpfc: Revise TRACE_EVENT log flag severities from KERN_ERR to
KERN
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Michael Reed (mreed8855)
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: New => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2077
The author, Kenny Levinsen , provided this:
```
The issue appears filed for wlgreet 0.4.1, and looks like an issue
already fixed in 0.5.0:
https://git.sr.ht/~kennylevinsen/wlgreet/commit/7e79d6004fc5e765a5c3ece6d377f8c5999d9dfa
```
I've tested a build at head (e4a7d1f) and confirm that this resol
Will look at the next SRU cycle for this, presuming the fix is as simple
as a single patch pull back to 6.8.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2077140
Title:
Intel Arrow Lake Graphics fe
Will look at the next SRU cycle for this, presuming the fix is as simple
as a single patch pull back to 6.8.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2077287
Title:
Fail to locate the LED of NV
Will look at the next SRU cycle for this, presuming the fix is as simple
as a single patch pull back to 6.8.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2077861
Title:
Intel Arrow Lake IBECC featu
Per upstream this is expected behaviour, if not a bit verbose or
improperly worded. They will eventually dial back the language to make
it less worrying.
justin.tee 2024-08-19 20:36:55 UTC
(In reply to justin.tee from comment #9)
> (In reply to Xavier from comment #8)
> > Created attachment 306743
** Package changed: kernel-package (Ubuntu) => linux (Ubuntu)
** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Noble)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2077861
T
** Also affects: kernel-package (Ubuntu Noble)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Package changed: kernel-package (Ubuntu) => linux (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2
Public bug reported:
I've tried starting greetd using the config installed by default and the
config as modified by the docs. I've tried to start it by saying this
at the console before starting sway:
$ sudo systemctl start greetd
/etc/greetd/config.toml says
> command = "sway --config /etc/gr
Public bug reported:
On starting urxvt, it appears to assume a 24 line window and put the
first prompt 23 lines above the bottom. Whereas my window renders as 91
lines of text.
I would expect the first prompt to appear at top of window, regardless
of window size. This was the behaviour before 2
Sorry, the 6.10 for 24.10 is currently in -proposed so you'll need to
enable the -proposed repo and install linux-image-generic which sho9uld
install 6.10. But if upstream 6.10 works, then most likely our proposed
6.10 will as well. It's worth checking just to be sure.
you can also install and use
Just to make sure I understand the instructions on using mainline and
grub-customizer:
I am currently at 6.8.0-39-generic #39-Ubuntu SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC and
you want me to revert to "Ubuntu, with Linux 6.7.10-060710-generic",
correct?
I have done as you suggest and am about to reboot. It's been
Looks like it works:
$ sudo apt list | grep linux-raspi
WARNING: apt does not have a stable CLI interface. Use with caution in scripts.
...
linux-raspi-headers-6.8.0-1008/noble-updates,noble-security,now 6.8.0-1008.8
arm64 [installed,automatic]
linux-raspi-headers-6.8.0-1009/noble-proposed,now 6
Public bug reported:
Hi,
It would be great if Raspberry Pi kernels could enable BTF. It's not
enabled at the moment:
$ ls /sys/kernel/btf/vmlinux
ls: cannot access '/sys/kernel/btf/vmlinux': No such file or directory
I think the minimal change is to add CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF=y and the
default k
Just to be clear also, can you retry this on the latest 24.04 daily
image, and also on 24.10 and see if the same thing happens on either of
these? This was first reported pre-release and there have been many
overall updates since then, so lets check the current images just to be
sure this is, indee
Currently there is no support for installing on iSCSI disks. There are
no current plans to do add iSCSI support in the installer, however, lets
keep the bug open as it is (as a Wishlist) item as we may pick it up in
the future.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ub
Does this happen on 6.10 (24.10 daily image)?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2070339
Title:
[Lenovo Ubuntu 24.04 Bug] dmesg show "spi-nor: probe of spi0.0 failed
with error -95"
To
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2073571
Title:
[Lenovo Ubuntu 24.04 Bug] lpfc driver reports failure message
To manage n
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => New
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Noble)
Status: Incomplete => New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061373
Title:
[Len
** Package changed: ubuntu => stress-ng
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2069674
Title:
Stress Tests failed during Server Certification test
To manage notifications about this bug go t
Hi Ranjan,
please confirm the following:
1: What kernel version you want this to land in. 22.04.5 has two
different kernel versions.
2: THese are ALL the necessary commit IDs, there are no missing
requisite commits in this list.
3: These are all clean cherry picks into the target kernel versio
This also breaks the golang `go tool cover -html` command, which creates
an HTML file in `/tmp` and opens it using `xdg-open`, and Firefox can't
find the file.
See https://github.com/golang/go/issues/68343
** Bug watch added: github.com/golang/go/issues #68343
https://github.com/golang/go/issu
** Changed in: gnome-calendar (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Opinion
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1915468
Title:
calendar should have a button in its top bar
To manage notificatio
** Bug watch added: bugzilla.gnome.org/ #762724
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=762724
** Changed in: gnome-calendar
Importance: Medium => Unknown
** Changed in: gnome-calendar
Status: Fix Released => Unknown
** Changed in: gnome-calendar
Remote watch: GNOME Bug Tracker
This was fixed in version 43-44 and newer.
** Changed in: gnome-calendar (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1948556
Title:
calendar has low co
AFAIK this was fixed in versions 43-44 or so. Try version 46.
** Changed in: gnome-calendar (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1551776
Title
This was fixed in versions 45-46.
** Changed in: gnome-calendar (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1843910
Title:
cannot add public (unauthent
Shouldn't happen in recent versions, at least based on comments
upstream.
** Changed in: gnome-calendar (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/18
** Bug watch added: gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-calendar/-/issues #160
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-calendar/-/issues/160
** Also affects: gnome-calendar via
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-calendar/-/issues/160
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received th
** Bug watch added: gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-calendar/-/issues #160
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-calendar/-/issues/160
** Also affects: gnome-calendar via
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-calendar/-/issues/160
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received th
PHP ext/mailparse also removed the use of `mbfl` in version 3.1.5
(2023-07-27), but Ubuntu 24.04 ships version 3.1.4 (2022-09-15).
https://pecl.php.net/package-
changelog.php?package=mailparse&release=3.1.5
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is su
PHP removed the `mbfl_name2no_encoding` symbol in this 8.3.0rc1 commit:
https://github.com/php/php-src/commit/a85adb170cf831e742c4be2333c886d054ca738c
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067
bladernr@galactica:~/development/kernels/upstream/mainline$ git describe
3ac1d14d0583a
v6.7-2-g3ac1d14d0583
So we will have to also pull this back to Mantic as well.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launc
Thanks Kim,
When you say 22.04, I presume this means 22.04 GA kernel (or 5.15)?
** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Mantic)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Jammy)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because yo
I had mentioned this in the meeting last time, but don't seen an update
here... but a couple things:
1:IIRC this is the latest generation server and XCC with the latest XCC
and UEFI firmware. Does this ALSO happen on the last generation
hardware with older versions of XCC and UEFI firmware?
2. O
The tricky part for me is that client was regularly changing, so I can't
confidently say when did errors start appearing, it's just very
suspicious that it needs high load (as new host and higher network
bandwidth made the issue more frequent), and uploading to the server as
just pure downloading d
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => New
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Noble)
Status: Incomplete => New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060437
Title:
The
Public bug reported:
error during update
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
Package: linux-modules-nvidia-470-6.5.0-27-generic 6.5.0-27.28~22.04.1+2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.5.0-28.29~22.04.1-generic 6.5.13
Uname: Linux 6.5.0-28-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_mode
Another workaround:
On jammy I am able to use `pbuilder-dist noble amd64 build myproject.dsc`
without the warning prompt if I first make a symlink:
```
cd /usr/share/debootstrap/scripts
sudo ln -s gutsy noble
```
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, whic
I was about to file a new one, and then I rediscovered the one that
still describes the remaining problem: bug #99112
It was a bit difficult to find, so I will update its metadata a bit to
relate to this. I'll leave you to decide whether its importance/priority
should be bumped from "low" to "high
** Attachment added: "rpc_tasks.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nfs-utils/+bug/2062568/+attachment/5770302/+files/rpc_tasks.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2062568
Oh fun, trying to add multiple attachments, I just ended up finding a
bug report from 2007 complaining about apport being able to do this, but
the web interface is limited, so guess I'll get a bit spammy.
Ran into the same as usual again, even with avoiding heavy utilization.
Not seeing anything t
** Attachment added: "nfs_threads.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nfs-utils/+bug/2062568/+attachment/5770301/+files/nfs_threads.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2062
While I'm not fully familiar with how things are done here, is it really
sensible that the "Fix Released" status prevents search on the main page
from even finding this issue?
We aren't far from the upstream fixes being available for a week already
without any of the supported releases of Ubuntu g
I suspect it's not necessarily related to the card model, but just in
case that is relevant, could you provide the model of the mellanox card
you're using?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs
Is this still happening with the latest images?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061373
Title:
[Lenovo Ubuntu 24.04 Bug] Print grub message before the uefi POST
screen disappears in
** Also affects: subiquity (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060924
Title:
[Lenovo Ubuntu 24.04 Bug] Can not detect iscsi disk stora
Ran into this again just hours after commenting by attempting to unpack a large
archive file. Apparently the new setup of higher performance host with more
network bandwidth is just too overwhelming to be usable with NFS with this
issue.
Reading alone still seems to be fine though.
Torturing 50
This kind of issue appeared with Ubuntu 23.10 for me on the server
mostly using an HDD for bulk storage with a not exactly powerful CPU
also being occupied with using WireGuard to secure the NFS connection.
Mentioning the performance details because I have a feeling they matter. An
also not exact
Can confirm the principle of least surprise being violated here. It took me
getting a permission error trying to replace a file to test a bugfix to realize
that:
- Commands without explicit permission elevation do system-wide modifications
- A theoretically user level setup is not fully covered b
Covering just Noble isn't really enough with Mantic and Jammy still providing
vulnerable packages according to the advisory listing affected versions as:
- < 1.10.9
- 1.12.x < 1.12.9
- 1.14.x < 1.14.6
- 1.15.x < 1.15.8
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs
Public bug reported:
Using Ubuntu 23.10, gave OpenSnitch 1.5.8.1-1ubuntu0.1 a try which initially
looked fine, but then started getting I/O errors apparently due to an NFS
server no longer being reachable.
Still continued to play with it for a while, including doing a reinstall to see
if it cha
Hi Matthew,
Its no problem, I can see how changing the version negotiation would be
tricky, thanks for looking at it so quickly.
Using the workaround and everything working correctly, no dramas
Thanks again,
Jeffrey
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
Can you confirm, the issue is summarized as thus:
1: NO network cable connected, installation is successful
2: Network cable connected and internet is available, installation is successful
3: Network cable connected, network is available, INTERNET is unavailable
(airgapped lab), installation fails
Public bug reported:
ubuntu software ubuntu-jammy-main (deb)
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
Package: bind9-host 1:9.18.18-0ubuntu0.22.04.2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.5.0-26.26~22.04.1-generic 6.5.13
Uname: Linux 6.5.0-26-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_modeset nv
Public bug reported:
Hello,
On Ubuntu Server 20.04.6 LTS with the update of nfs-common package =>
"nfs-common/focal-updates 1:1.3.4-2.5ubuntu3.5" to "nfs-common/focal-
updates 1:1.3.4-2.5ubuntu3.6" I started having issues mounting ntf4.0
volumes. The NFS server supports 4.0, 4.1 and 4.2
The issu
Something in a recent dnsmasq update broke KVM. I hit the same and found
a workaround that gets me rolling again wtih KVM guests at least
here's a quick shell summary:
bladernr@galactica:~$ sudo virsh net-start default
error: Failed to start network default
error: internal error: Child process
1 - 100 of 8607 matches
Mail list logo
