In Ubuntu 12.10 alpha 2 the new Poppler 0.20.1 works correctly. Is there
any activity with respect to backporting it to Ubuntu 12.04 LTS? We plan
using Ubuntu LTS in the school for ages...
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu
> do you know what commit fixed it?
* CairoOutputDev: Only align stroke coords for horizontal and vertical
lines (Bug #48318)
You can find here the patch:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48318
Thank you!
** Bug watch added: freedesktop.org Bugzilla #48318
https://bugs.freedes
This bug is corrected in the latest stable release of the Poppler
0.20.0. Please use it in Ubuntu 12.04 instead of the problematic Poppler
0.18.4!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/967153
This bug is corrected in the latest unstable release of the Poppler
0.19.3 (0.20 Beta 3).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/967153
Title:
ugly functions (not smooth) in evince
To manag
The problem persists with Evince 3.4.0.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/967153
Title:
ugly functions (not smooth) in evince
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.
** Attachment added: "bad.png good.png test.pdf"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/967153/+attachment/2954974/+files/evine_bug.tar.bz2
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/967153
Title:
u
Public bug reported:
Compare functions in these pictures in the attachment:
good.png (Ubuntu 11.10)
bad.png (Ubuntu 12.04 beta)
The difference is big (and sad): the graph of the function is not smooth now.
This is the test file (in the attachment):
test.pdf
Maybe it is a problem of popple
#4 was a reaction to #2 was written by Olympus TeX
--
TexMakerX package for Ubuntu
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/670873
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://l
This is schematic and extremely unfriendly opinion without any validity.
We know this type "opinion" well. This is exactly what the author of the
Texmaker spreads. He is piqued about the fork or I do not know. I do not
care this person.
TexMakerX is a really good software.
And I do not want to "f
Thanx, "workrave" was a mistake...
--
TexMakerX package for Ubuntu
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/670873
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: workrave
"TexMakerX is a platform-independent LaTeX editor. It provides interactive
spell checking, code folding and extended text navigation, while it also
includes the features of the LaTeX editor Texmaker, like wizards, code
completion and syntax hi
11 matches
Mail list logo
