[Bug 690739] Re: Regression (USB Camera) 2.6.32-->2.6.35

This is no longer a problem under 2.38 kernel in Natty (Beta). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/690739 Title: Regression (USB Camera) 2.6.32-->2.6.35 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubunt

[Bug 753023] Re: Cannot add WINE shortcuts to unity

Same here. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/753023 Title: Cannot add WINE shortcuts to unity -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/

[Bug 753305] Re: Python applications do not work correctly in Unity launcher

Same thing here. This is annoying. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/753305 Title: Python applications do not work correctly in Unity launcher -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@l

[Bug 746910] Re: gnome-power-manager crashed with SIGSEGV in fclose()

Same here. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/746910 Title: gnome-power-manager crashed with SIGSEGV in fclose() -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.u

[Bug 690739] [NEW] Regression (USB Camera) 2.6.32-->2.6.35

Public bug reported: The camera works under kernel 2.6.32 but not under the latest kernel in Maverick. Device 005: ID 0ac8:303b Z-Star Microelectronics Corp. ZC0303 Webcam Thanks. Best Regards, HBLaw ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You

[Bug 528213] Re: ibus not working in Lucid Lynx alpha 3

IBus is showing stop sign again when changing input method in Maverick. I happens randomly for me, though. Change status. ** Changed in: ibus (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released => New -- ibus not working in Lucid Lynx alpha 3 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/528213 You received this bug notific

[Bug 447692] Re: Ctrl + Alt + F1 etc. fail to send me to console

A follow up - I turned on radeon.modeset and the console is back. To be clear: withOUT KMS, the console is gone; with KMS, the console is back. Hope this helps. -- Ctrl + Alt + F1 etc. fail to send me to console https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/447692 You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 447692] Re: Ctrl + Alt + F1 etc. fail to send me to console

Console also gone here for ATI card. I am using X1250 and the open source driver. -- Ctrl + Alt + F1 etc. fail to send me to console https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/447692 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs m

[Bug 346095] Re: notify-osd doesn't honor my preference

How arrogant Ubuntu developers are! Sigh. -- notify-osd doesn't honor my preference https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/346095 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://

[Bug 447680] Re: firefox assert failure: IBUS:ERROR:ibusconnection.c:762:ibus_connection_call: assertion failed: (dbus_connection_get_is_connected (priv->connection))

** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33382876/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "Disassembly.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33382877/Disassembly.txt ** Attachment added: "ExtensionSummary.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33382879/ExtensionSumma

[Bug 447680] [NEW] firefox assert failure: IBUS:ERROR:ibusconnection.c:762:ibus_connection_call: assertion failed: (dbus_connection_get_is_connected (priv->connection))

Public bug reported: Binary package hint: firefox-3.5 don't know how it happened. ProblemType: Crash Architecture: i386 AssertionMessage: IBUS:ERROR:ibusconnection.c:762:ibus_connection_call: assertion failed: (dbus_connection_get_is_connected (priv->connection)) Date: Fri Oct 9 19:27:47 2009

[Bug 446817] Re: transmission crashed with SIGSEGV in malloc()

** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/1346/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "Disassembly.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/1347/Disassembly.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcMaps.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/1348/ProcMaps.txt ** Attac

[Bug 446817] [NEW] transmission crashed with SIGSEGV in malloc()

Public bug reported: Binary package hint: transmission Just crashed. Don't know how. ProblemType: Crash Architecture: i386 Date: Thu Oct 8 19:09:27 2009 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/transmission Package: transmission-gtk 1.75-0ubuntu1 ProcCmdline: transmission ProcEnviron

[Bug 432179] Re: cursor should not show during xsplash startup

I did not know that the cursor has already been removed (from the code). Do you mean that if everything runs as designed there will not be a cursor? (On my machine it is a round cursor ie. "busy"). I thought this aesthetic issue has been ignored from the posts above. But if it is just me, how can

[Bug 432179] Re: cursor should not show during xsplash startup

:-0 That explains. If a cursor in absolutely needed, can anyone makes it transparent? :-) -- cursor should not show during xsplash startup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/432179 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu

[Bug 432179] Re: cursor should not show during xsplash startup

It's like you see a delicious dish of food with a dead fly on the CENTER of it. A lot of work can be done on other bugs, but all those work will not have any positive effect if people feel bad. :-) People will not know that ubuntu team has fixed so many bugs that prevented so many problems (say tho

[Bug 436303] Re: Openoffice writer - custom style improperly applied

Still present in Karmic 3.1.1 version. -- Openoffice writer - custom style improperly applied https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/436303 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.co

[Bug 439653] Re: evolution assert failure: evolution: ../../src/xcb_io.c:378: _XAllocID: Assertion `ret != inval_id' failed.

** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/32759829/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "Disassembly.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/32759830/Disassembly.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcMaps.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/32759831/ProcMaps.txt ** Attac

[Bug 439653] [NEW] evolution assert failure: evolution: ../../src/xcb_io.c:378: _XAllocID: Assertion `ret != inval_id' failed.

Public bug reported: Binary package hint: evolution Not sure what happened. ProblemType: Crash Architecture: i386 AssertionMessage: evolution: ../../src/xcb_io.c:378: _XAllocID: Assertion `ret != inval_id' failed. Date: Wed Sep 30 14:16:07 2009 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10 ExecutablePath: /usr/bi

[Bug 437759] Re: Weird Sound (in notification?) in Karmic

Follow up with this bug: Maybe the lack of some quiet buffer when changing between applications leads to this problem. It seems the sequence when changing application is that pusleaudio first mute that application, and the set the volume to certain value, and then play the sound from that applicat

[Bug 437759] [NEW] Weird Sound (in notification?) in Karmic

Public bug reported: Binary package hint: pulseaudio Hi, I just installed Karmic Alpha 6 yesterday (upgraded from Jaunty) and I experienced some weird sound problems. It is not with the general playback or capture - rhythmbox, totem, Skype calls are fine. It is with the notification sound. For e

[Bug 124460] Re: Blogger.com posts don't set title

I can confirm this bug with Ubuntu 8.04 (i386). -- Blogger.com posts don't set title https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/124460 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https:/

[Bug 64847] Re: [Ubuntu] Home folder configuration file arrangement

Or we can just bring home folder for common users to one higher level - /home/username/.xxx /home/username/.xxa /home/username/.xxb /home/username/.xxc ... /home/username/realhome/ -> where users can organize themselves and GUI home folder browser will restrict to this folder and will r

[Bug 64847] Re: [Ubuntu] Home folder configuration file arrangement

Further your thought on the way Linux works, I would suggest an alternative that may lie within Ubuntu's power. Why not patch file browser a little bit so that the file browser will not show folders begin with "." in home folder of users; and place another special folder (or link or something) to a

[Bug 64847] [Ubuntu] Home folder configuration file arrangement

Public bug reported: Suggestion Only: When I check hidden files in home folder, there are many many ".X" folders and files, which is annoying. I think they are all configuration files. Why not put them in a .etc folder? So the home folder will be neat, resulting in the following structure: ~

[Bug 64819] [Edgy] Usplash should use black background

Public bug reported: Reference is made to bug #64666 at https://launchpad.net/distros/ubuntu/+source/fbset/+bug/64666 I suggest the background color be changed back to black, because some users will (not may) meet problems in their booting process in showing splash image. As far as I know, full s

Re: [Bug 64666] Re: [Edgy] 5 white blinking stripes when booting on i810 laptop

Please also consider that black background boot splash suggestion. Should I file another bug or something? On 10/9/06, towsonu2003 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > sorry for assigning to xorg... I guess this happens due to frame buffer? > > ** Changed in: Ubuntu > Sourcepackagename: None => xorg >

[Bug 64666] [Edgy] 5 white blinking stripes when booting on i810 laptop

Public bug reported: Boot splash is supposed to be a brown screen stretched to the whole screen. On my laptop the screen is blank, with five white stripes blinking within a 640*480 (I guess) box in the middle. Specs: SONY PCG-SRX55C (China market model, which should be comparable to SRX99/87 etc)