This bug got fixed somewhere down the way to Firefox 47.0
** Changed in: firefox (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1209176
Title:
Make Firefo
Okay, I also created a userChrome.css. My code is much more simple and
doesn’t need any !important:
#threadTree > treechildren::-moz-tree-row(even) {
background-color: -moz-oddtreerow; }
If the developers prevent coloring the odd rows, I color the even rows.
--
You received this bug notificat
I discovered this bug just yesterday as I used pdfgrep to find a special
expression in the PDF archive of my mails. Only mails before August 2011
were searchable.
Until this bug is fixed: What exacxtly do I have to do to prevent the
ps-and-back-conversion? I didn’t understand the thing with *cupsF
Public bug reported:
The Mozilla Firefox for Ubuntu canonical - 1.0 supports the CSS feature
hyphens:auto with the prefix -moz. But it doesn’t use the same
hyphenation patterns as for example LibreOffice (as the “fixed” bug
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/894166 claims).
I’
Here is a screen shot. It not only affects the English version but also
the German one.
** Attachment added: "Comparison LibO-Calc with and without lo-menubar"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lo-menubar/+bug/1102485/+attachment/3563830/+files/lo-menubar%20without%20window.png
--
Yo
Public bug reported:
If you click on the battery icon in the status area and choose “Battery”
you can open a diagram about the charge state of your laptop battery
(gnome-power-statistics). The diagram’s y-axis is divided from 0% to
100% in steps of 10%. That’s fine. But the x-axis is divided into
Is really noone else affected by this bug? Is it caused by wrong
adjustments on my laptop? Does anyone know a possible reason?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/882512
Title:
gnome-font-
I think only with appropriate hyphenation you can use justified text on
webpages, especially in languages as German. Missing hyphenation
sometimes results in catastrophic word spaces. More information about
hyphenation and an English test paragraph on
http://blog.fontdeck.com/post/9037028497/hyphen
Public bug reported:
The page http://www.belleslettres.eu/blog/firefox-silbentrennung.php
provides a test field for German hyphenation in Firefox 8.0
(build1-0ubuntu0.11.10.3). On my friend’s Windows PC the hyphenation
works, but it didn’t work on my Ubuntu Laptop (11.10 Oneiric)– there
simply was
** Attachment added: "overlapping lines (not only in the shown Lato font)"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/882512/+attachment/2575129/+files/gfv-overlapping-lines.png
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.lau
Public bug reported:
I’ve upgraded from natty to oneiric this week (Ubuntu 11.10). One thing
that catched my eye was that the text lines in the gnome-font-viewer are
spaced too tight. Not only do ascenders and descenders sometimes touch
but overlap (see attachment). This way its more difficult to
(1) About Switzerland’s ß-substitution: In German there’s a fairly rigid
coherence between how you write a word an how you speak it. And a basic rule
(not without exceptions, but very few) is, that a vowel before a doubled
consonant is spoken short. So the word « Floss » (in Germany »Floß«, eng
Thanks for your comparison, Denis! There you can see how poorly
Microsoft (or ascender fonts?) designed their ẞ. It looks like you took
the ß and put it between the capitals.
That’s what I meant with »differing from the capital version«, mach. ẞ
and ß should be differ so much, that you can recogni
And here the comparision of the ẞes on my computer.
** Attachment added: "vsz-vergleich.jpg"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-font-family-sources/+bug/650498/+attachment/1748762/+files/vsz-vergleich.jpg
--
Expansion: 'ẞ' LATIN CAPTIAL LETTER SHARP S (U+1E9E)
https://bugs.laun
Dear mach,
I don’t think your arguments are as valid as they seem. Personally I
prefer the Dresdner Form of the ẞ but I’m open for facts to convince me.
Allow myself to question your points.
1) The Dresden Form does only lean forward or topple, if it is purely
designed. As you can see in the imag
Yes, there has to be something in that slot, David. But I can’t support
your antipathy against the proposed form of the capital ß. It’s
definetely not “a strange and distorted ‘big’ version of ß”. Maybe you
judge it as a wired form BECAUSE you aren’t German speaker an aren’t
used to it. Think åbout
To put a SS-ligature at the position which is indented by the Unicode
Consortium to be filled with the letter Capital Sharp S ist wrong. You
could write an opentype rule to substitute ß with SS in capitalised
words but you shoudn’t missuse the place of a different symbole.
The capital Eszett (shar
17 matches
Mail list logo
