You're going to send all of my application and file searches to Amazon?
How can this not be a flagrant violation of my privacy? As much as I
like Ubuntu, this feature is going to make me switch back to Debian and
donate $10 a year to them.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a m
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/745973
Title:
package sbackup-gtk 0.11.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade:
ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned
err
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: sbackup
Failed to upgrade to 11.04 alpha.
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04
Package: sbackup-gtk 0.11.4-0ubuntu2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-7.39-generic 2.6.38
Uname: Linux 2.6.38-7-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
Arch
It's really annoying for anyone running a large-resolution display. Too
much netbook thinking for the desktop.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/685577
Title:
Launcher gets in the way wh
Whatever solution you people come up with for 11.04 makes no difference
to me, but holy heck this needs to be fixed. It's embarrassing to have a
100 Paper Cuts project without this being on it.
If you're going to make a 1 pixel border on your default theme, you'd
better figure out a way for people
We encountered this issue recently while trying to compile against
third-party header files. Is there any chance of this being fixed soon?
--
ptrdiff_t undefined if is included after and
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/277524
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubunt
Now running patch 21 and still having the problem. Two weeks to the
release date and no ticket updates or responses. Good job. Keep up the
good work.
--
rejecting I/O to offline device
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/480665
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bug
I'm now running 2.6.32-20 and it's still an issue. Is this slated to be
fixed upstream? Is there a certain patch we can watch for?
--
rejecting I/O to offline device
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/480665
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscri
I am now using the 2.6.32-19 kernel and still having this problem.
This issue is still unassigned and there hasn't been an update to the
ticket in two weeks.
--
rejecting I/O to offline device
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/480665
You received this bug notification because you are a member of U
I agree that the buttons are too dark. There's certainly not enough
contrast for my old eyes on the bottom panel.
Does that patch work with that latest update to Radiance? I couldn't
seem to find the section indicated.
--
buttons are too dark and blurry
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/542736
You
No status updates for the past week on this? I am having the same
problem on 10.04 beta 1, using the 2.6.32-17 kernel.
[ 678.102158] sd 13:0:0:0: rejecting I/O to offline device
[ 678.102180] sd 13:0:0:0: rejecting I/O to offline device
[ 678.102196] sd 13:0:0:0: rejecting I/O to offline device
I am fully updated with the release candidate and all updates to 28
October '09 and I am still getting this error message.
--
gvim complains about "gtk_form_set_static_gravity: assertion
`static_gravity_supported' failed" in the shell it's started from
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/402188
You
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: libqwt5-qt4
The 5.2.0 release of Qwt has been out since Mar. '09 and should be
included in 9.10 by default. This would allow for making .deb packages
that depend on it.
Thanks
** Affects: qwt (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
**
13 matches
Mail list logo