[Bug 1521732] [NEW] package kaccounts-providers (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: se încearcă suprascrierea „/usr/share/accounts/providers/google.provider”, care este și în pachetul account-p

2015-12-01 Thread Gelu Lacusta
Public bug reported: Processing triggers for install-info (6.0.0.dfsg.1-3) ... Erori întâlnite în timpul prelucrării: /var/cache/apt/archives/kde-config-telepathy-accounts_4%3a15.08.2-0ubuntu1_i386.deb /var/cache/apt/archives/kaccounts-providers_4%3a15.08.2-0ubuntu1_all.deb E: Sub-process /usr/

[Bug 1062699] Re: package linux-image-3.2.0-31-generic 3.2.0-31.50 failed to install/upgrade: run-parts: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/initramfs-tools exited with return code 1 [/dev/disk/by-uuid: Is a direc

2012-10-30 Thread Gelu N.
with MODULES=dep in /etc/initramfs-tools/conf.d/driver-policy: # /bin/bash -x /usr/sbin/update-initramfs -v -u -k 3.2.0-32-generic [...] + generate_initramfs + echo 'update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-3.2.0-32-generic' update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-3.2.0-32-generic + OPT

[Bug 1062699] Re: package linux-image-3.2.0-31-generic 3.2.0-31.50 failed to install/upgrade: run-parts: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/initramfs-tools exited with return code 1 [/dev/disk/by-uuid: Is a direc

2012-10-15 Thread Gelu N.
PS: And of course the generated initrd.img is 14M instead of 2.1M. :) G.N. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1062699 Title: package linux-image-3.2.0-31-generic 3.2.0-31.50 failed to

[Bug 1062699] Re: package linux-image-3.2.0-31-generic 3.2.0-31.50 failed to install/upgrade: run-parts: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/initramfs-tools exited with return code 1 [/dev/disk/by-uuid: Is a direc

2012-10-15 Thread Gelu N.
# cat /etc/fstab # /etc/fstab: static file system information. # # Use 'blkid' to print the universally unique identifier for a # device; this may be used with UUID= as a more robust way to name devices # that works even if disks are added and removed. See fstab(5). # # proc

[Bug 1062699] Re: package linux-image-3.2.0-31-generic 3.2.0-31.50 failed to install/upgrade: run-parts: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/initramfs-tools exited with return code 1 [/dev/disk/by-uuid: Is a direc

2012-10-08 Thread Gelu N.
That occur during an installation/uninstallation of an any package. :~$ ls -l /dev/disk/by-uuid total 0 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 10 Oct 6 16:16 b887034b-acfb-489a-b6b6-4733a0bf5602 -> ../../sdc1 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 10 Oct 6 16:14 c1351f6b-075e-4f8f-b977-28914b25cdc2 -> ../../sda1 lrwxrwxrwx 1

[Bug 1062699] Re: package linux-image-3.2.0-31-generic 3.2.0-31.50 failed to install/upgrade: run-parts: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/initramfs-tools exited with return code 1

2012-10-05 Thread Gelu N.
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1062699 Title: package linux-image-3.2.0-31-generic 3.2.0-31.50 failed to install/upgrade: run-parts: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/initramfs-tools exited w

[Bug 1062699] [NEW] package linux-image-3.2.0-31-generic 3.2.0-31.50 failed to install/upgrade: run-parts: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/initramfs-tools exited with return code 1

2012-10-05 Thread Gelu N.
Public bug reported: Selecting previously unselected package linux-image-3.2.0-31-generic. (Reading database ... 275104 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking linux-image-3.2.0-31-generic (from .../linux-image-3.2.0-31-generic_3.2.0-31.50_amd64.deb) ... Done. Selecting previously u

[Bug 1021579] Re: ltspfs shows wrong partition size when plug-in usb drive into thin client

2012-07-19 Thread Gelu N.
Yes, the bug exists as mentioned here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ltsp/+bug/996533/comments/1 . If you try to copy a file in nautilus, you are warned that "There is not enough space on the destination". But if "Copy Anyway" button is pressed, copying goes well without any problems. -- You recei

[Bug 796787] [NEW] subprocesul dpkg-deb --fsys-tarfile a returnat starea de eroare la ieșire 2

2011-06-13 Thread Strat Stefan Gelu
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: update-manager subprocesul dpkg-deb --fsys-tarfile a returnat starea de eroare la ieșire 2 ** Affects: update-manager (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs

[Bug 796781] [NEW] nici un pachet denumit „python2.7-minimal” nu este instalat, nu se poate configura

2011-06-13 Thread Strat Stefan Gelu
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: update-manager nici un pachet denumit „python2.7-minimal” nu este instalat, nu se poate configura ** Affects: update-manager (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubun

[Bug 796780] [NEW] subprocesul dpkg-deb --fsys-tarfile returnează starea de eroare la ieșire 2

2011-06-13 Thread Strat Stefan Gelu
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: update-manager subprocesul dpkg-deb --fsys-tarfile returnează starea de eroare la ieșire 2 ** Affects: update-manager (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs

[Bug 389322] Re: Yahoo server authentication changed: Pidgin =<2.5.6 will not connect to Yahoo! servers.

2009-09-03 Thread Gelu
** Changed in: pidgin (Ubuntu Karmic) Status: Fix Released => Fix Committed -- Yahoo server authentication changed: Pidgin =<2.5.6 will not connect to Yahoo! servers. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/389322 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which i

Re: [Bug 85969] Re: Java Docs Package Won't Install

2008-11-22 Thread Gelu
Remove sun-java6-doc with synaptic and all it's ok,you d'nt need this package. 2008/11/22 angela cartagena <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > how could i remove that from popping up? i don't need the documentation > anymore and i would just like to remove the java docs problem. i tried > to remove the package

Re: [Bug 85969] Re: Java Docs Package Won't Install

2008-11-15 Thread Gelu
Thank's,it's work! 2008/11/15 drieschner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Apparently it is necessary to remove explicitly the doc package (or what is > left of it) after the bug has shown up: > sudo apt-get remove openjdk-6-doc > Michael > > -- > Java Docs Package Won't Install > https://bugs.launchpad.net/