[Bug 1686713] Re: [SRU] 2.25

2017-05-11 Thread Federico Gimenez
While addressing https://bugs.launchpad.net/snappy/+bug/1689332 the team decided to freeze the ubuntu-core snap and publish the current stable to all the channels, this prevents the error provoked by the new 2.25 package. This was the only blocker, the rest of the verification was good: + Verifie

[Bug 1686713] Re: [SRU] 2.25

2017-05-09 Thread Federico Gimenez
During the verification we found https://bugs.launchpad.net/snappy/+bug/1689332, snapd team considers that this is serious enough to block the release. ** Tags removed: verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-failed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 1681799] Re: [SRU] 2.24

2017-04-21 Thread Federico Gimenez
Thanks Mathieu! :) I've done also the verification of the package on trusty, xenial, yakkety, and zesty: + Verified bugs associated to the SRU affecting the user interface + Executed manual tests described in [1] + Verified new features from the changelog [2] affecting the user interface + Execut

[Bug 1673568] Re: snapd 2.23.6 SRU tracking bug

2017-04-12 Thread Federico Gimenez
Package verified on xenial and yakkety: + Verified bugs associated to the SRU affecting the user interface + Executed manual tests described in [1], results on xenial [2], on yakkety [3] + Verified new features: + warn if snap-confine is not available when executing hooks: ubuntu@autopkgtest:~$

[Bug 1677622] Re: missing ramdisks in latest amd64 kernel snap

2017-04-03 Thread Federico Gimenez
Yes, the same test is currently passing on rev 55 (edge) [1], the /dev/ramX files are there after booting [2], and starting with rev 59 that files are missing and the tests fail [3]. [1] https://travis-ci.org/snapcore/spread-cron/builds/216734158 [2] http://paste.ubuntu.com/24306876/ [3] https://t

[Bug 1677622] Re: missing ramdisks in latest amd64 kernel snap

2017-03-30 Thread Federico Gimenez
The oroblem happens on an amd64 ubuntu-core system, no apport-collect in there, please let me know how can I get the required logs on that system. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, w

[Bug 1677622] [NEW] missing ramdisks in latest amd64 kernel snap

2017-03-30 Thread Federico Gimenez
Public bug reported: While running the snapd suite using the amd64 kernel snap from the beta channel (rev 59) we got this error running [1]: 2017-03-30 09:36:41 Error preparing linode:ubuntu-core-16-64:tests/main/snap-auto-mount : - [ ... ] Create a ramdisk with the testrootorg-store.accoun

[Bug 1659783] Re: Remove unity, x11-utils and xvfb from test control file

2017-01-27 Thread Federico Gimenez
** Changed in: snapd (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1659783 Title: Remove unity, x11-utils and xvfb from test control file To manag

[Bug 1659783] Re: Remove unity, x11-utils and xvfb from test control file

2017-01-27 Thread Federico Gimenez
Hi Jean-Baptiste, thanks for reporting this bug, the changes are proposed in https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/2734 Cheers, ** Changed in: snapd (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Federico Gimenez (fgimenez) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubu

[Bug 1596629] Re: Support snap configuration

2016-12-16 Thread Federico Gimenez
Verified on yakkety: $ apt-cache policy snapd snapd: Installed: 2.17.1+16.10ubuntu1 Candidate: 2.17.1+16.10ubuntu1 Version table: *** 2.17.1+16.10ubuntu1 500 500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu yakkety-proposed/main amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 2.16+16.10ub

[Bug 1596629] Re: Support snap configuration

2016-12-16 Thread Federico Gimenez
The final "snap get" call was missing in the previous paste: $ sudo snap get spread-cron username blabla -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1596629 Title: Support snap configuration To

[Bug 1637215] Re: [SRU] 2.17.1

2016-12-02 Thread Federico Gimenez
I've verified 2.17.1ubuntu1, all seems to be working fine: + Done exploratory testing (install/uninstall snaps, list interfaces, connect/disconnect plugs, search, list snaps, list changes). + Verified actual upgrade from 2.16ubuntu3 to 2.17.1ubuntu1 and uninstall. + Checked interaction with class

[Bug 1637215] Re: [SRU] 2.17.1

2016-11-23 Thread Federico Gimenez
Verification done following [1], all steps performed, specifically: + Verified bugs associated to the SRU affecting the user interface. + Done exploratory testing (install/uninstall snaps, list interfaces, connect/disconnect plugs, search, list snaps, list changes). + Verified new features from c

[Bug 1633276] Re: SNAP_CONFINE_DEBUG should not trigger on empty strings

2016-11-17 Thread Federico Gimenez
Verified from the command line: fgimenez@fgimenez-Standard-PC-i440FX-PIIX-1996:~$ for value in yes no 0 1 unicorn; do > SNAP_CONFINE_DEBUG=$value ubuntu-core-launcher blah 2>debug.$value || > : > done fgimenez@fgimenez-Standard-PC-i440FX-PIIX-1996:~$ cat debug.yes DEBUG: shifting ar

[Bug 1633273] Re: add support for bidirectional mount event propagation in /media

2016-11-17 Thread Federico Gimenez
Verified executing manually the steps in the automated test https://github.com/snapcore/snap-confine/blob/master/spread-tests/main /media-sharing/task.yaml ** Tags removed: verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubun

[Bug 1633275] Re: snap-confine should respond to --version

2016-11-17 Thread Federico Gimenez
Verified from the command line: $ ubuntu-core-launcher --version snap-confine 1.0.44 ** Tags removed: verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bu

[Bug 1637215] Re: [SRU] 2.17.1

2016-11-17 Thread Federico Gimenez
** Tags removed: verification-done ** Tags added: verification-needed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1637215 Title: [SRU] 2.17.1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https:/

[Bug 1596629] Re: Support snap configuration

2016-11-16 Thread Federico Gimenez
This feature is covered by these spread tests [1] [2], this is a successful execution of them [3]. [1] https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/blob/master/tests/main/snap-get/task.yaml [2] https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/blob/master/tests/main/snap-set/task.yaml [3] https://travis-ci.org/snapcore/snap

[Bug 1626617] Re: console-conf does not allow to set up dns for static ip

2016-10-27 Thread Federico Gimenez
Hi Martin, I can confirm that this works now, verified on amd64, core v16.04.1 r324. Thanks! ** Tags removed: verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpa

[Bug 1630586] Re: Pi3 kernel crash and is unreliable

2016-10-13 Thread Federico Gimenez
With the image from [1] I wasn't able to reproduce the oops on 10 consecutive boots (logs attached), the image was flashed with: $ sudo dd if=~/Desktop/pi3-newbsp.img of=/dev/sdc bs=4M oflag=sync status=noxfer [1] http://people.canonical.com/~ppisati/lp1630586/pi3-newbsp.img.xz ** Attachment ad

[Bug 1586465] Re: Add support for hooks

2016-10-13 Thread Federico Gimenez
Now that snap set is working and that configure hooks work it would be very useful to at least have the meta/hooks directory implicitly included in the snap, currently I need to do things like [1] and [2] (maybe there are better ways of doing that, please let me know if so). Thanks! [1] https://g

[Bug 1630479] Re: PATH is not set after namespace is initialized

2016-10-10 Thread Federico Gimenez
All working fine with a recent core snap version: fgimenez@localhost:~$ snap version snap2.16+ppa35-1 snapd 2.16+ppa35-1 series 16 fgimenez@localhost:~$ snap list Name Version Rev Developer Notes classic16.04 17 canonical devmode core 16.04.1 72 canonica

[Bug 1630479] [NEW] permission denied while opening mount namespace file

2016-10-05 Thread Federico Gimenez
Public bug reported: This happens in a amd64 image using the classic snap from edge in devmode, this are the snap versions: test@localhost:~$ snap list Name Version Rev Developer Notes classic16.04 15 canonical devmode core 16.04.1 15 canonical - pc 1

[Bug 1623579] Re: [SRU] 2.15.2

2016-09-23 Thread Federico Gimenez
Verified the usage of root's data dirs when running via sudo: fgimenez@innsmouth:~$ apt-cache policy snapd snapd: Installed: 2.15.2ubuntu1 Candidate: 2.15.2ubuntu1 Version table: *** 2.15.2ubuntu1 500 500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-proposed/main amd64 Packages 1

[Bug 1626617] [NEW] console-conf does not allow to set up dns for static ip

2016-09-22 Thread Federico Gimenez
Public bug reported: There's no way to setup DNS info for static IP configuration, which leads to broken name resolution: fgimenez@localhost:~$ cat /etc/netplan/00-snapd-config.yaml # This is the network config written by 'console-conf' network: ethernets: enxb827ebd3f20f: addresses:

[Bug 1623579] Re: [SRU] 2.15.2

2016-09-20 Thread Federico Gimenez
Verification done following [1], all steps performed, specifically: + Executed manual tests described in [2] and [3] + Done exploratory testing (install/uninstall snaps, connect/disconnect interfaces, search, list) + Verified new features: + interfaces/apparmor: allow reading /etc/environment

[Bug 1618095] Re: [SRU] 2.14.2

2016-09-07 Thread Federico Gimenez
Verification done following [1], all steps performed, specifically: + Verified bugs associated to the SRU affecting the user interface + Executed manual tests described in [2] and [3] + Done exploratory testing (install/uninstall snaps, connect/disconnect interfaces, search, list) + Verified new

[Bug 1612362] Re: [SRU] 2.12

2016-08-17 Thread Federico Gimenez
Verification done following [1], all steps performed, specifically: + Executed manual tests described in [2] and [3] + Done exploratory testing (install/uninstall snaps, connect/disconnect interfaces, search, list) + Verified new features: + snap prepare-image does not require sudo + process-

[Bug 1612362] Re: [SRU] 2.12

2016-08-17 Thread Federico Gimenez
** Description changed: This is a new version of snapd. The changelog for 2.12 is available here https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/blob/2.12/debian/changelog, the raw git changelog is available here: https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/commits/2.12 (note that the debian changelog is a

[Bug 1612120] Re: $SNAP_USER_DATA is no longer created by snap-confine but is not yet created by snapd

2016-08-15 Thread Federico Gimenez
Verified with current snap-confine: fgimenez@innsmouth:~$ apt-cache policy snap-confine snap-confine: Installed: 1.0.38-0ubuntu0.16.04.4 Candidate: 1.0.38-0ubuntu0.16.04.4 Version table: *** 1.0.38-0ubuntu0.16.04.4 500 500 http://es.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-updates/main amd6

[Bug 1612291] Re: cannot create $SNAP_USER_DATA when using ecryptfs and sudo

2016-08-15 Thread Federico Gimenez
Verified with latest snap-confine ** Tags removed: verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1612291 Title: cannot create $SNAP_USER_DATA wh

[Bug 1612684] Re: dies when run in a place that is not inside the snap chroot

2016-08-15 Thread Federico Gimenez
Works with latest snap-confine: fgimenez@innsmouth:~$ apt-cache policy snap-confine snap-confine: Installed: 1.0.38-0ubuntu0.16.04.8 Candidate: 1.0.38-0ubuntu0.16.04.8 Version table: *** 1.0.38-0ubuntu0.16.04.8 500 500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-proposed/main amd64 Pack

[Bug 1605303] Re: [SRU] 2.11

2016-08-04 Thread Federico Gimenez
Verification done following [1], all steps performed, specifically: + Executed manual tests described in [2] and [3] + Done exploratory testing (install/uninstall snaps, connect/disconnect interfaces, search, list) + Verified new features through automated tests + Verified actual upgrade from 2.0

[Bug 1599799] Re: snapd > 2.0.2 fails on yakkety

2016-07-15 Thread Federico Gimenez
This is the test executed [1], with [2] the snapbuild binary should be generated. Not sure why it's not present after the test exits in your case, I can find it running locally (yakkety, autopkgtest 4.0.2, command line: "adt-run --unbuilt-tree . --apt-upgrade -s --- qemu ~/adt-yakkety- amd64-cloud.

[Bug 1599799] Re: snapd > 2.0.2 fails on yakkety

2016-07-14 Thread Federico Gimenez
Hi again, > integration-tests/bin/ does not exist, and tests/lib/snapbuild is a > directory with just "main.go" in it. This is true for both the > original source dir and the copy in > $AUTOPKGTEST_ARTIFACTS/build/src/github.com/snapcore/snapd > that the test creates. Sorry, I mistakenly sent the

[Bug 1599799] Re: snapd > 2.0.2 fails on yakkety

2016-07-14 Thread Federico Gimenez
Hi Pitti, thanks a lot for looking into this. About your questions: * Where do you get this "basic.snap" from? It is built from the source files, from the root of the project something like: integration-tests/bin/snapbuild integration-tests/data/snaps/basic . That should generate a basic_1.0_al

[Bug 1599799] Re: snapd > 2.0.2 fails on yakkety

2016-07-07 Thread Federico Gimenez
FWIW this is the output of journalctl -xe after the error http://paste.ubuntu.com/17367141/ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1599799 Title: snapd > 2.0.2 fails on yakkety To manage not

[Bug 1597329] Re: [SRU] 2.0.10

2016-07-07 Thread Federico Gimenez
Verification done following [1], all steps performed, specifically: + Verified bugs associated to the SRU affecting the user interface + Executed manual tests described in [2] and [3] + Done exploratory testing (install/uninstall snaps, connect/disconnect interfaces, search, list) + Verified new

[Bug 1594675] Re: syscall error on i386 unless socketcall is allowed

2016-07-05 Thread Federico Gimenez
Is this still a problem? I'm not able to reproduce with 2.0.9 [1], also not seen with 2.0.10. Thanks! [1] http://paste.ubuntu.com/18518840/ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1594675 Titl

[Bug 1596085] Re: Installing nextcloud snap on Ubuntu Mate Raspberry Pi freezes

2016-06-28 Thread Federico Gimenez
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1591148 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1591148 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1591148 snap install fails with a kernel lacking apparmor support -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is s

[Bug 1596085] Re: Installing nextcloud snap on Ubuntu Mate Raspberry Pi freezes

2016-06-24 Thread Federico Gimenez
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1591148 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1591148 Hey Kyle, sorry for not dropping a comment here explaining the reasons for marking this a duplicate. In the other bug all the problem came from the kernel, not the distro or the arch, as the error message st

[Bug 1596085] Re: Installing nextcloud snap on Ubuntu Mate Raspberry Pi freezes

2016-06-24 Thread Federico Gimenez
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1591148 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1591148 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1591148 snap install fails with a kernel lacking apparmor support -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is s

[Bug 1593201] Re: [SRU] 2.0.9

2016-06-22 Thread Federico Gimenez
Verification done following [1], all steps performed, specifically: * Verified bugs associated to the SRU affecting the user interface * Executed manual tests described in [2] and [3] * Done exploratory testing (install snaps, connect/disconnect interfaces, tried new snap run command) * Verified

[Bug 1589534] Re: [SRU] 2.0.8

2016-06-13 Thread Federico Gimenez
Done validations described in https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SnapdUpdates ** Tags removed: verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1589534 Title:

[Bug 1588977] Re: [2.0.6] snapd.refresh.timer fails

2016-06-13 Thread Federico Gimenez
Verified with latest proposed: fgimenez@fgimenez-Standard-PC-i440FX-PIIX-1996:~$ apt-cache policy snapd snapd: Installed: 2.0.8 Candidate: 2.0.8 Version table: *** 2.0.8 500 500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-proposed/main amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status

[Bug 1587445] Re: 'snap list' with nothing installed should be more tasteful

2016-06-13 Thread Federico Gimenez
Verified with latest proposed: fgimenez@fgimenez-Standard-PC-i440FX-PIIX-1996:~$ apt-cache policy snapd snapd: Installed: 2.0.8 Candidate: 2.0.8 Version table: *** 2.0.8 500 500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-proposed/main amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status

[Bug 1583794] Re: snap htop doesnt show processes

2016-06-13 Thread Federico Gimenez
Verified with latest proposed: fgimenez@fgimenez-Standard-PC-i440FX-PIIX-1996:~$ apt-cache policy snapd snapd: Installed: 2.0.8 Candidate: 2.0.8 Version table: *** 2.0.8 500 500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-proposed/main amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status

[Bug 1537793] Re: Autoupdate should be less frequent and more randomly distributed

2016-06-13 Thread Federico Gimenez
Verified the randomness of the installed timer with snapd from proposed by checking the scheduled times in two consecutive installations: fgimenez@fgimenez-Standard-PC-i440FX-PIIX-1996:~$ apt-cache policy snapd snapd: Installed: 2.0.8 Candidate: 2.0.8 Version table: *** 2.0.8 500 50

[Bug 1583085] Re: [SRU] New stable micro release

2016-05-27 Thread Federico Gimenez
Hi Brian, I've already verified the resolution of bug 1574829, please let me know if something is still missing. About the Packaging QA section in https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SnapdUpdates I didn't contribute to the doc but it seems to refer to QA of the new package, which is what we have done, not pac

[Bug 1574829] Re: snappy install requires root or login, but doesn't tell you so

2016-05-27 Thread Federico Gimenez
With the 2.0.5 package: $ snap install hello-world error: access denied (snap login --help) $ snap login --help Usage: snap [OPTIONS] login email The login command authenticates on snapd and the snap store and saves credentials into the ~/.snap/auth.json file. Further communication with snapd

[Bug 1583085] Re: [SRU] New stable micro release

2016-05-25 Thread Federico Gimenez
FWIW apart from the autopkgtest suite executed successfully on our ci environment we have done successful manual exploratory testing of these commands: * snap install (including reboot) * snap remove * snap interfaces * snap interfaces connect * snap interfaces disconnect * snap changes * snap cha

[Bug 1423497] Re: ssh: "/tmp/adt-run-wrapper: command not found" error if testbed setup fails

2016-05-23 Thread Federico Gimenez
Hi, this seems to be similar to #1470209, I'm still getting this error eventually. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1423497 Title: ssh: "/tmp/adt-run-wrapper: command not found" error i

[Bug 1423497] Re: ssh: "/tmp/adt-run-wrapper: command not found" error if testbed setup fails

2016-05-23 Thread Federico Gimenez
Actual link: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/autopkgtest/+bug/1470209 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1423497 Title: ssh: "/tmp/adt-run-wrapper: command not found" error if t

[Bug 1470209] Re: ssh runner: hook_wait_reboot sometimes times out after package upgrades

2016-03-30 Thread Federico Gimenez
Hi again, here it is again [1], should I reopen the bug or open a new one? Thanks! [1] http://162.213.35.179:8080/job/github-snappy-integration-tests- cloud/938/consoleFull -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs

[Bug 1470209] Re: ssh runner: hook_wait_reboot sometimes times out after package upgrades

2016-03-11 Thread Federico Gimenez
Hi Martin :) we are getting the same "/tmp/adt-run-wrapper: command not found" error eventually (1/30 more or less) while executing tests that involve a reboot on snappy's scalingstack instances [1] (VPN required), please let me know if I can provide any further info. Thanks! [1] http://162.213.3

[Bug 1552730] Re: error using nova ssh-setup

2016-03-03 Thread Federico Gimenez
Hi Martin thanks for your response. This the "nova list" output: jenkins-slave@d44710aa9fcb:~$ nova list +--++++-++ | ID | Name | Status

[Bug 1552730] Re: error using nova ssh-setup

2016-03-03 Thread Federico Gimenez
In previous successful executions I was getting a deprecation warning: adt-virt-ssh: DBG: execute-timeout: /usr/share/autopkgtest/ssh-setup/nova open -d --flavor autopkgtest --image ubuntu/ubuntu-xenial-daily-amd64-server-* --keyname jenkins-github-snapcraft-autopkgtest-cloud-89 --net-id=net_ue

[Bug 1552730] [NEW] error using nova ssh-setup

2016-03-03 Thread Federico Gimenez
Public bug reported: Hi, I'm getting this error [1] using the nova ssh-setup option on a xenial up-to-date box, please let me know if you need any further information. $ lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu Xenial Xerus (development branch) Release:16.04 $ apt-cache policy autopkgtest

[Bug 1474735] Re: snappy ssh setup ERROR: The --channel option does not work with --image

2015-07-15 Thread Federico Gimenez
Awesome, thanks a lot for the immediate fix pitti, cheers! :) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1474735 Title: snappy ssh setup ERROR: The --channel option does not work with --image

[Bug 1474735] Re: snappy ssh setup ERROR: The --channel option does not work with --image

2015-07-15 Thread Federico Gimenez
>From the log attached you can see that the command used is: $ /usr/bin/adt-run -B --setup-commands 'touch /run/autopkgtest_no_reboot.stamp' --override-control _integration- tests/data/output/control --built-tree /home/fgimenez/workspace/snappy/trunk --output-dir /tmp/snappy- test/output/latest-fa

[Bug 1474735] [NEW] snappy ssh setup ERROR: The --channel option does not work with --image

2015-07-15 Thread Federico Gimenez
Public bug reported: Hi, I'm getting the error in the bug title when trying to execute adt- run over a snappy image, debug log attached. autopkgtest version: $ apt-cache policy autopkgtest Installed: 3.16 Candidate: 3.16 Version table: *** 3.16 0 500 http://es.archive.ubuntu.com/ub

[Bug 1472516] [NEW] udf cannot double map partitions error

2015-07-08 Thread Federico Gimenez
Public bug reported: Hi, this is the output I get while trying to generate the latest image for rolling/edge (the same happens for other combinations of release and channel): $ sudo ubuntu-device-flash --verbose core rolling --output /tmp/snappy-test/image/snappy-rolling-edge-latest.img --channe

[Bug 1469647] [NEW] adt-run fails with new snappy images

2015-06-29 Thread Federico Gimenez
Public bug reported: With the latest changes from [1], new snappy images are lacking dpkg support. This makes adt-run fail, see the attached log, the image was created with: $ sudo ubuntu-device-flash --verbose core rolling -o /tmp/snappy- test/image/snappy.img --channel edge --developer-mode Th

[Bug 1467981] [NEW] unhelpful error message on invalid release for core

2015-06-23 Thread Federico Gimenez
Public bug reported: If you pass an invalid release for the core command, the error message doesn't explain what happened: $ sudo ubuntu-device-flash core rollinggg --channel edge -o snappy.img --developer-mode Determining oem configuration generic-amd64 failed to install: snappy package not fou

[Bug 1444170] Re: python code does not pass the flake8 static checks

2015-04-17 Thread Federico Gimenez
** Branch linked: lp:~canonical-platform-qa/address-book- app/flake8-fixes -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1444170 Title: python code does not pass the flake8 static checks To manage

[Bug 1444170] Re: python code does not pass the flake8 static checks

2015-04-17 Thread Federico Gimenez
** Changed in: address-book-app (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Federico Gimenez (fgimenez) ** Changed in: address-book-app (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1441023] [NEW] Allow to preserve powerd-cli on cleanup (ssh virt-server)

2015-04-07 Thread Federico Gimenez
Public bug reported: Currently powerd-cli gets killed in the cleanup action of ssh-setup/adb. For some tests (power meter related) the daemon should be running after finishing so that the screen doesn't turn off. Given the great flexibility of adt-run an alternative script which doesn't pkill pow

[Bug 1380324] Re: [needs-packaging] python-pylama

2015-03-01 Thread Federico Gimenez
ITP bug raised at [1], the work is almost done, I'll begin looking for sponsors now Cheers! [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=779449 ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #779449 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=779449 -- You received this bug notificati

[Bug 1380324] Re: [needs-packaging] python-pylama

2015-02-26 Thread Federico Gimenez
** Changed in: ubuntu Assignee: (unassigned) => Federico Gimenez (fgimenez) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1380324 Title: [needs-packaging] python-pylama To man

[Bug 1423491] Re: Can't locate installed perl modules while executing the phone sanity tests

2015-02-19 Thread Federico Gimenez
Ok, running in vivid with the latest version of autopkgtest all goes good, the PERL5LIB environment variable is properly set, log attached Thanks a lot and sorry for the noise ** Attachment added: "log" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/autopkgtest/+bug/1423491/+attachment/4322549/+fi

[Bug 1423491] [NEW] Can't locate installed perl modules while executing the phone sanity tests

2015-02-19 Thread Federico Gimenez
Public bug reported: When executing the sanity tests on the phone with a command like: adt-run --timeout-short=600 -B --unbuilt-tree=$PWD --output-dir ~/workspace/ust --copy ~/.config/ubuntu-sanity- tests.conf:/home/phablet/.config/ubuntu-sanity-tests.conf --setup- commands 'mount -o remount,rw /

[Bug 683150] Re: FTBFS on Natty

2010-12-12 Thread Federico Gimenez Nieto
This should be fixed with the 1.2.2-2 version. Full build log: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/doctrine/1.2.2-2/+build/2076707/+files /buildlog_ubuntu-natty-i386.doctrine_1.2.2-2_BUILDING.txt.gz Cheers -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is