[Bug 2102056] Re: openvpn on Plucky fails to connect

2025-03-11 Thread Erich Eickmeyer
Yep, there it is: [ 8892.788254] audit: type=1400 audit(1741755862.182:3157): apparmor="DENIED" operation="open" class="file" profile="openvpn" name="/home/erich/.cert/nm-openvpn/myvpn-tls-auth.pem" pid=19618 comm="openvpn" requested_mask="r" denied_mask="r" fsuid=0 ouid=1000 ** Also affects: ap

[Bug 2102057] Re: [BPO] qtractor/1.5.3-1 from plucky

2025-03-11 Thread Erich Eickmeyer
** Description changed: [Impact] Qtractor is in a pre-1.0 release state in Noble. In Oracular and Plucky, Qtractor is beyond that. This package has been requested to be updated. However, per the upstream changelogs, this package has several new features along with bugfixes, therefore

[Bug 2102057] [NEW] [BPO] qtractor/1.5.3-1 from plucky

2025-03-11 Thread Erich Eickmeyer
Status: New ** Changed in: qtractor (Ubuntu Plucky) Status: New => Invalid ** Changed in: qtractor (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Changed in: qtractor (Ubuntu Noble) Assignee: (unassigned) => Erich Eickmeyer (eeickmeyer) -- You received this bug noti

[Bug 2102056] [NEW] openvpn on Plucky fails to connect

2025-03-11 Thread Erich Eickmeyer
Public bug reported: Attempting to connect to my VPN on Plucky results in an inability to connect. I haven't been able to figure out why. I'm able to connect via Noble and Oracular and was able to prior to the latest upload of 2.6.13 in Plucky. I haven't been able to discern any sizable difference

[Bug 2046844] Re: AppArmor user namespace creation restrictions cause many applications to crash with SIGTRAP

2025-03-11 Thread Erich Eickmeyer
** No longer affects: remmina (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2046844 Title: AppArmor user namespace creation restrictions cause many applications to crash with SIGTRAP To

[Bug 2102033] Re: remmina blocked by apparmor in Plucky

2025-03-11 Thread Erich Eickmeyer
That is the only AppArmor log being generated. And yes, I meant to remove remmina from #2046844 but had DayJob to do. Besides, Launchpad was giving me errors. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/b

[Bug 2102033] [NEW] remmina blocked by apparmor in Plucky

2025-03-11 Thread Erich Eickmeyer
Public bug reported: Remmina is now failing on plucky, blocked by apparmor: Failed to register: GDBus.Error:org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.AccessDenied: An AppArmor policy prevents this sender from sending this message to this recipient; type="method_call", sender=":1.126" (uid=1000 pid=9636 comm="re

[Bug 2046844] Re: AppArmor user namespace creation restrictions cause many applications to crash with SIGTRAP

2025-03-11 Thread Erich Eickmeyer
** Also affects: remmina (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2046844 Title: AppArmor user namespace creation restrictions cause many ap

[Bug 2100703] Re: Gimp crashes copying a 40x1 zone

2025-03-07 Thread Erich Eickmeyer
Sadly, no that doesn't because it's coming from the original reporter. In order for a bug to be a bug, it has to be reproducible by more than the original reporter, at which point it becomes "Confirmed" or, if it's a dev like me, it would become "Triaged." If it can't be reproduced, it becomes "in

[Bug 2100984] Re: ubuntu cinnamon minimal is not minimal. installs all games, apps ect.

2025-03-05 Thread Erich Eickmeyer
So this implies one of these things, or perhaps a combination: - livecd-rootfs isn’t building the squashfs for the minimal install correctly - subiquity, the installer, is not honoring the selection in ubuntu-desktop-bootstrap (the frontend you interact with) - ubuntu-desktop-bootstrap isn’t pass

[Bug 2100984] Re: ubuntu cinnamon minimal is not minimal. installs all games, apps ect.

2025-03-05 Thread Erich Eickmeyer
** Also affects: subiquity Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: ubuntu-desktop-provision Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bu

[Bug 2100703] Re: Gimp crashes copying a 40x1 zone

2025-03-05 Thread Erich Eickmeyer
Could not reproduce on Noble, even on a Raspberry Pi. GIMP did not crash. ** Changed in: gimp (Ubuntu Noble) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2100703 Tit

[Bug 2100703] Re: Gimp crashes copying a 40x1 zone

2025-03-05 Thread Erich Eickmeyer
Could not reproduce on Oracular. Followed steps exactly. GIMP did not crash. ** Changed in: gimp (Ubuntu Oracular) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/210070

[Bug 2099865] Re: FTBFS on armhf in the release pocket

2025-02-28 Thread Erich Eickmeyer
blender no longer supports 32-bit. ** Changed in: blender (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2099865 Title: FTBFS on armhf in the release poc

[Bug 2099662] Re: update-grub Segmentation fault

2025-02-23 Thread Erich Eickmeyer
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2099811 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2099811 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 2099811 Segmentation fault if multiple Ubuntu on same PC -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribe

[Bug 2098723] Re: [BPO] hydrogen/1.2.2+dfsg-2 from plucky to noble

2025-02-20 Thread Erich Eickmeyer
I did the upload? https://launchpadlibrarian.net/777294260/hydrogen_1.2.2+dfsg-2~bpo24.04.1_source.changes Also, "No change" is just for the backport. Everything else is what follows. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. ht

[Bug 2098723] [NEW] [BPO] hydrogen/1.2.2+dfsg-2 from plucky to noble

2025-02-17 Thread Erich Eickmeyer
) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Erich Eickmeyer (eeickmeyer) Status: In Progress ** Tags: backport noble ** Also affects: hydrogen (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: hydrogen (Ubuntu Noble) Status: New => In Progress ** Chan

[Bug 2092243] Re: btop doesn't display AMD graphics card information

2025-02-16 Thread Erich Eickmeyer
Hi there! Thanks for this bug report, and I apologize that nobody got around to looking at it until now. It looks like it could stand to have a soft dependency (Recommends:) on librocm-smi64-1. However, this package is synced directly from Debian and is not patched in Ubuntu, so this is an upstre

[Bug 2095489] Re: KIO-mounted SMB filesystems isn’t accessible within snaps; can't write to /run

2025-02-15 Thread Erich Eickmeyer
Removed the libreoffice and firefox packages since this concerns the snap, not the .deb, and this bug tracker tracks neither. ** Also affects: snapd (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** No longer affects: firefox (Ubuntu) ** No longer affects: libreoffice (Ubuntu) -- You rec

[Bug 2097793] Re: [Enhancement] Add option to lock columns width

2025-02-14 Thread Erich Eickmeyer
Hi there! Enhancement requests for packages like this need to be directed at the upstream source, which in this case, fortunately, is right here on Launchpad. We're unable to make an enhancement like this downstream in the Ubuntu package, so I'm redirecting this to that area. Thanks for understa

[Bug 2095535] Re: ubuntu-release-upgrader Qt interface Qt6 incompatibility

2025-02-13 Thread Erich Eickmeyer
** Description changed: + [Impact] + + Qt-based flavors of Ubuntu are unable to upgrade oracular -> plucky due + to Qt6 incompatibility issues. I have done the legwork and refactored + the code so that it works. + + [Test Case] + + * From Kubuntu, attempt an upgrade via 'do-release-upgrade -d -

[Bug 2095535] Re: ubuntu-release-upgrader Qt interface Qt6 incompatibility

2025-02-13 Thread Erich Eickmeyer
** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-qt-code/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+git/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+merge/481227 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2095535 Title:

[Bug 2095535] Re: ubuntu-release-upgrader Qt interface Qt6 incompatibility

2025-02-13 Thread Erich Eickmeyer
** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-qt-code/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+git/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+merge/481225 ** Changed in: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu Oracular) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu Plucky) Stat

[Bug 2097471] Re: nautilus onedrive online account not working

2025-02-13 Thread Erich Eickmeyer
** Package changed: gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock (Ubuntu) => gnome- online-accounts (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2097471 Title: nautilus onedrive online account not wo

[Bug 2097820] Re: Additional Drivers tab on software-properties-qt does not populate

2025-02-11 Thread Erich Eickmeyer
Done. ** Description changed: Plucky Puffin Loading `software-properties-qt` in the Additional Drivers tab results - in no population of the interface. + in no population of the interface. The GTK interface, as tested on + Edubuntu, did not show this issue. + + $ ubuntu-drivers list + nvi

[Bug 2097820] [NEW] Additional Drivers tab on software-properties-qt does not populate

2025-02-10 Thread Erich Eickmeyer
Public bug reported: Plucky Puffin Loading `software-properties-qt` in the Additional Drivers tab results in no population of the interface. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 25.04 Package: software-properties-qt 0.108 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.12.0-15.15-generic 6.12.11 Uname: Linux 6

[Bug 2064166] Re: [SRU] Exclude alacritty from Ubuntu Cinnamon ISOs

2025-02-07 Thread Erich Eickmeyer
Reverted the seed since we're not moving forward as, even after blacklisting in noble, the build failure persisted. ** Changed in: ubuntucinnamon-meta (Ubuntu Noble) Status: In Progress => Triaged ** Changed in: ubuntucinnamon-meta (Ubuntu Noble) Milestone: ubuntu-24.04.2 => noble-upda

[Bug 2064166] Re: [SRU] Exclude alacritty from Ubuntu Cinnamon ISOs

2025-02-07 Thread Erich Eickmeyer
In plucky, the blacklisting of gnome-shell was effective and alacritty is gone there. Just uploaded a seed change to noble, so this might be fixed after all with the blacklisting. @utkarsh: > Apologies - why was this not tested before uploading? If there was a way to test this locally, I'd love t

[Bug 2064166] Re: [SRU] Exclude alacritty from Ubuntu Cinnamon ISOs

2025-02-07 Thread Erich Eickmeyer
Not abandoning the fix just yet. I've got a trick or two up my sleeve still. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064166 Title: [SRU] Exclude alacritty from Ubuntu Cinnamon ISOs To manage

[Bug 2064166] Re: [SRU] Exclude alacritty from Ubuntu Cinnamon ISOs

2025-02-06 Thread Erich Eickmeyer
Unfortunately, seeding gnome-terminal higher had the unwanted side- effect of pulling-in all of gnome-shell to satisfy notification-daemon. This will need to be revisited after adding notification-daemon to the seed. ** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-noble ** Tags added: ver

[Bug 2064166] Re: [SRU] Exclude alacritty from Ubuntu Cinnamon ISOs

2025-02-06 Thread Erich Eickmeyer
Unfortunately, seeding gnome-terminal higher had the unwanted side- effect of pulling-in all of gnome-shell to satisfy notification-daemon. This will need to be revisited after adding notification-daemon to the seed. ** Changed in: ubuntucinnamon-meta (Ubuntu Plucky) Status: Fix Released =>

[Bug 2064166] Re: [SRU] Exclude alacritty from Ubuntu Cinnamon ISOs

2025-02-06 Thread Erich Eickmeyer
** Changed in: ubuntucinnamon-meta (Ubuntu Plucky) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064166 Title: [SRU] Exclude alacritty from Ubuntu Cinnam

[Bug 2064166] Re: [SRU] Exclude alacritty from Ubuntu Cinnamon ISOs

2025-02-06 Thread Erich Eickmeyer
** Changed in: ubuntucinnamon-meta (Ubuntu Plucky) Milestone: None => ubuntu-25.04-feature-freeze ** Changed in: ubuntucinnamon-meta (Ubuntu Noble) Milestone: None => ubuntu-24.04.2 ** Changed in: ubuntucinnamon-meta (Ubuntu Noble) Assignee: (unassigned) => Erich

[Bug 2064166] Re: Exclude alacritty from Ubuntu Cinnamon ISOs

2025-02-06 Thread Erich Eickmeyer
** Description changed: + [Impact] + + Ubuntu Cinnamon is not explicitly seeding `gnome-terminal`. In order to + satisfy the dependency requirements of `cinnamon-core`, it installs the + first terminal alphabetically it can find that satisfies the + `x-terminal-emulator` dependency, which in this

[Bug 2064166] Re: Exclude alacritty from Ubuntu Cinnamon ISOs

2025-02-06 Thread Erich Eickmeyer
This much I've been able to ascertain: i cinnamon-core Depends gnome-terminal | x-terminal-emulator i A alacritty Provides x-terminal-emulator It certainly seems as though gnome-terminal needs to be seeded higher in order to fix the x-terminal-emulator requirement as it's not finding gnome

[Bug 2096990] Re: [SRU] Noble - minimal install removes kubuntu-desktop metapackage and kubuntu-settings-desktop

2025-02-06 Thread Erich Eickmeyer
Initial testing shows that the .iso image is, indeed, not being built with packages in -proposed. This is not ideal for testing. The only way I could test this is by installing the latest daily and then install the `kubuntu-settings-desktop/noble-proposed` and the `kubuntu-desktop/noble-proposed`

[Bug 2097300] Re: ReleaseUpgrade Fails UbuntuStudio v22.04 to 24.04 Hangs at Installing Chromium Browser

2025-02-03 Thread Erich Eickmeyer
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2078639 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2078639 Thank you for your bug report. To maintain a respectful atmosphere, please follow the code of conduct - http://www.ubuntu.com/project/about- ubuntu/conduct. Bug reports are handled by humans, the majority of

[Bug 2095535] Re: ubuntu-release-upgrader Qt interface Qt6 incompatibility

2025-01-31 Thread Erich Eickmeyer
** Summary changed: - ubuntu-release-upgrader Qt interface segmentation fault + ubuntu-release-upgrader Qt interface Qt6 incompatibility -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2095535 Title:

[Bug 2078639] Re: Ubuntu Studio upgrade, pipewire <-> pulseaudio conflict

2025-01-31 Thread Erich Eickmeyer
Fully upgraded Ubuntu Studio 22.04 VM: Running `do-release-upgrade -p` produced no errors, upgrade went smoothly, even though some application packages get removed as a result of the time_t64 transition. This is not a regression as upgrades working is more desirable than not. This upgrade issue ha

[Bug 2095535] Re: ubuntu-release-upgrader Qt interface segmentation fault

2025-01-31 Thread Erich Eickmeyer
Oracular has a few missing dependencies to make this work, so this is a two-fold fix: * Fix the one line in DistUpgradeViewKDE.py * Fix the runtime deps in oracular ** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~eeickmeyer/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+git/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+merge/480

[Bug 2097129] [NEW] [BPO] lsp/plugins/1.2.20-1 from plucky to noble

2025-01-31 Thread Erich Eickmeyer
/ubuntu/backports-staging ** Affects: lsp-plugins (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Invalid ** Affects: lsp-plugins (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Medium Assignee: Erich Eickmeyer (eeickmeyer) Status: Won't Fix ** Affects: lsp-plugins (Ubuntu P

[Bug 2097129] Re: [BPO] lsp/plugins/1.2.20-1 from plucky to noble

2025-01-31 Thread Erich Eickmeyer
This actualy FTBFS on amd64. Further backports of this package are not possible. ** Changed in: lsp-plugins (Ubuntu Noble) Status: In Progress => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.

[Bug 2078639] Re: Ubuntu Studio upgrade, pipewire <-> pulseaudio conflict

2025-01-31 Thread Erich Eickmeyer
** Changed in: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu Noble) Milestone: noble-updates => ubuntu-24.04.2 ** Changed in: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu Noble) Assignee: (unassigned) => Nick Rosbrook (enr0n) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 2078639] Re: Ubuntu Studio upgrade, pipewire <-> pulseaudio conflict

2025-01-31 Thread Erich Eickmeyer
** Changed in: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu Noble) Milestone: ubuntu-24.04.2 => noble-updates -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2078639 Title: Ubuntu Studio upgrade, pipewire <->

[Bug 2045902] Re: releasechecker crashed with apt_pkg.Error in open(): E:Read error - read (5: Input/output error)

2025-01-30 Thread Erich Eickmeyer
This looks like it was a transient error as, at the time, it needed information from git.launchpad.net. That has since been fixed, but the fact of the matter is it doesn't look like it was able to read the information. Marking this as "invalid" simply because it seems to have been a network error a

[Bug 2078639] Re: Ubuntu Studio upgrade, pipewire <-> pulseaudio conflict

2025-01-26 Thread Erich Eickmeyer
Upon diving in to apt.log, it appears as though pipewire-media-session needs to be force-removed (deprecated in favor of wireplumber). What seems to be happening after pipewire-audio is installed is we're finding this: > MarkKeep pipewire-media-session:amd64 < 0.4.1-2ubuntu1 @ii gR > FU=0 This do

[Bug 1958003] Re: Upgrade anki to version 2.1.26 or higher

2025-01-26 Thread Erich Eickmeyer
No. The lack of an "SA" for Share-Alike makes it completely incompatible with Ubuntu's licensing requirements. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1958003 Title: Upgrade anki to version 2.

[Bug 1958003] Re: Upgrade anki to version 2.1.26 or higher

2025-01-26 Thread Erich Eickmeyer
Hi Daniel, It's not so much of a build issue as it is a licensing issue (see the Debian bug that Colin linked). For that reason, we cannot include in the Ubuntu repositories. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bug

[Bug 2095535] Re: ubuntu-release-upgrader Qt interface segmentation fault

2025-01-25 Thread Erich Eickmeyer
** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~eeickmeyer/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+git/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+merge/480123 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2095535 Title: u

[Bug 2095535] Re: ubuntu-release-upgrader Qt interface segmentation fault

2025-01-25 Thread Erich Eickmeyer
This should certainly be as easy as a one-line change in DistUpgradeViewKDE.py: Line 156: - self.setWordWrapMode(QTextOption.NoWrap) + self.setWordWrapMode(QTextOption.WrapMode.NoWrap) I guess I'll work on a MR, but I have no way to test this, at least that I know of. This was d

[Bug 2095535] Re: ubuntu-release-upgrader Qt interface segmentation fault

2025-01-25 Thread Erich Eickmeyer
I think the segmentation fault is a red herring. I think the issue lies here: > can't load DistUpgradeViewKDE (type object 'QTextOption' has no attribute 'NoWrap') Also noticed some missing dependencies in ubuntu-release-upgrader-qt: * python3-pyqt6.qtquick * pyqt6-dev-tools So, I believe if

[Bug 2095535] Re: ubuntu-release-upgrader Qt interface segmentation fault

2025-01-22 Thread Erich Eickmeyer
`qt6-wayland` was already installed. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2095535 Title: ubuntu-release-upgrader Qt interface segmentation fault To manage notifications about this bug go t

[Bug 2095535] [NEW] ubuntu-release-upgrader Qt interface segmentation fault

2025-01-22 Thread Erich Eickmeyer
Public bug reported: This is likely an issue RE: Qt5 vs Qt6. I have reason to believe the code is still Qt5 but oracular and higher is Qt6, meaning the code needs to be refactored. Terminal output: $ do-release-upgrade -d -m desktop -f DistUpgradeViewKDE Checking for a new Ubuntu release localu

[Bug 2095235] Re: [BPO] libffado/2.4.9-1 from plucky

2025-01-18 Thread Erich Eickmeyer
** Description changed: [Impact] libffado is a linux driver for FireWire audio devices that also includes a development library, an API, and several FireWire tools. While FireWire is a dying breed in devices overall and devices are no longer being manufacturered, in the world of audio

[Bug 2095235] [NEW] [BPO] libffado/2.4.9-1 from plucky

2025-01-18 Thread Erich Eickmeyer
Public bug reported: [Impact] libffado is a linux driver for FireWire audio devices that also includes a development library, an API, and several FireWire tools. While FireWire is a dying breed in devices overall and devices are no longer being manufacturered, in the world of audio it is still ve

[Bug 2095235] Re: [BPO] libffado/2.4.9-1 from plucky

2025-01-18 Thread Erich Eickmeyer
** Changed in: libffado (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Erich Eickmeyer (eeickmeyer) ** Changed in: libffado (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 2078639] Re: Ubuntu Studio upgrade, pipewire <-> pulseaudio conflict

2025-01-17 Thread Erich Eickmeyer
Confirmed, this upgrade did not go well. Same method as above, in a VM, fully upgraded 22.04 installation from ISO. It does appear as though pipewire-media-session needs to be force- removed as, for some reason, wireplumber is unable to do so with its conflicts line, possibly because it's being in

[Bug 2093141] Re: [SRU] Switch from Ask Ubuntu to Ubuntu Discourse for Primary Support

2025-01-10 Thread Erich Eickmeyer
$ apt-cache policy edubuntu-menu edubuntu-menu: Installed: 24.04.2.2 Candidate: 24.04.2.2 Version table: *** 24.04.2.2 100 100 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu noble-proposed/universe amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 24.04.2 500 500 http://us.archive.u

[Bug 2093141] Re: [SRU] Switch from Ask Ubuntu to Ubuntu Discourse for Primary Support

2025-01-10 Thread Erich Eickmeyer
$ apt-cache policy edubuntu-menu edubuntu-menu: Installed: 24.10.2.2 Candidate: 24.10.2.2 Version table: *** 24.10.2.2 100 100 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu oracular-proposed/universe amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 24.10.2 500 500 http://us.archiv

[Bug 2093141] Re: [SRU] Switch from Ask Ubuntu to Ubuntu Discourse for Primary Support

2025-01-10 Thread Erich Eickmeyer
** Changed in: edubuntu-menu (Ubuntu Plucky) Status: In Progress => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2093141 Title: [SRU] Switch from Ask Ubuntu to Ubuntu Discourse

[Bug 2093141] Re: [SRU] Switch from Ask Ubuntu to Ubuntu Discourse for Primary Support

2025-01-09 Thread Erich Eickmeyer
$ apt-cache policy edubuntu-menu edubuntu-menu: Installed: 24.10.2.1 Candidate: 24.10.2.1 Version table: *** 24.10.2.1 100 100 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu oracular-proposed/universe amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 24.10.2 500 500 http://us.archiv

[Bug 2093141] Re: [SRU] Switch from Ask Ubuntu to Ubuntu Discourse for Primary Support

2025-01-09 Thread Erich Eickmeyer
Adding a screenshot of oracular before the changes for posterity. Notice the AskUbuntu icon. ** Attachment added: "oracular-before.png" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/edubuntu-menu/+bug/2093141/+attachment/5850734/+files/oracular-before.png -- You received this bug notification be

[Bug 2093140] Re: [SRU] Switch from Ask Ubuntu to Ubuntu Discourse for Primary Support

2025-01-09 Thread Erich Eickmeyer
$ apt-cache policy ubuntustudio-menu ubuntustudio-menu: Installed: 0.55.2 Candidate: 0.55.2 Version table: *** 0.55.2 500 500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy-proposed/universe amd64 Packages 500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy-proposed/universe i386 Pack

[Bug 2093140] Re: [SRU] Switch from Ask Ubuntu to Ubuntu Discourse for Primary Support

2025-01-09 Thread Erich Eickmeyer
** Tags removed: verification-failed-noble ** Tags added: verification-done-noble -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2093140 Title: [SRU] Switch from Ask Ubuntu to Ubuntu Discourse for Pr

[Bug 2093140] Re: [SRU] Switch from Ask Ubuntu to Ubuntu Discourse for Primary Support

2025-01-09 Thread Erich Eickmeyer
$ apt-cache policy ubuntustudio-menu ubuntustudio-menu: Installed: 0.86.1 Candidate: 0.86.1 Version table: *** 0.86.1 100 100 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu noble-proposed/universe amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 0.86 500 500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/

[Bug 2093140] Re: [SRU] Switch from Ask Ubuntu to Ubuntu Discourse for Primary Support

2025-01-09 Thread Erich Eickmeyer
$ apt-cache policy ubuntustudio-menu ubuntustudio-menu: Installed: 0.87.1 Candidate: 0.87.1 Version table: *** 0.87.1 100 100 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu oracular-proposed/universe amd64 Packages 100 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu oracular-proposed/universe i386

[Bug 2093140] Re: [SRU] Switch from Ask Ubuntu to Ubuntu Discourse for Primary Support

2025-01-09 Thread Erich Eickmeyer
Adding a "before" picture, just for posterity. This is what we're switching from. Example is from oracular. Notice the "Ask Ubuntu" icon very top. ** Attachment added: "oracular-before.png" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntustudio-menu/+bug/2093140/+attachment/5850725/+files/orac

[Bug 2087756] Re: [SRU] package ubuntustudio-default-settings (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: Trying to overwrite "/etc/skel/.face" which is also in package desktop-base 12.0.6+nmu1ubuntu1

2025-01-07 Thread Erich Eickmeyer
$ apt-cache policy ubuntustudio-default-settings ubuntustudio-default-settings: Installed: (none) Candidate: 24.10.27 Version table: 24.10.27.1 100 100 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu oracular-proposed/universe amd64 Packages 24.10.27 500 500 http://us.archive.u

[Bug 2087756] Re: [SRU] package ubuntustudio-default-settings (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: Trying to overwrite "/etc/skel/.face" which is also in package desktop-base 12.0.6+nmu1ubuntu1

2025-01-07 Thread Erich Eickmeyer
$ apt-cache policy ubuntustudio-default-settings ubuntustudio-default-settings: Installed: (none) Candidate: 24.04.26.6 Version table: 24.04.26.7 100 100 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu noble-proposed/universe amd64 Packages 24.04.26.6 500 500 http://us.archive.

[Bug 2093140] Re: [SRU] Switch from Ask Ubuntu to Ubuntu Discourse for Primary Support

2025-01-07 Thread Erich Eickmeyer
** Changed in: ubuntustudio-menu (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: ubuntustudio-menu (Ubuntu Noble) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: ubuntustudio-menu (Ubuntu Oracular) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because

[Bug 2093141] Re: [SRU] Switch from Ask Ubuntu to Ubuntu Discourse for Primary Support

2025-01-07 Thread Erich Eickmeyer
** Changed in: edubuntu-menu (Ubuntu Noble) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: edubuntu-menu (Ubuntu Oracular) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/

[Bug 2093141] Re: [SRU] Switch from Ask Ubuntu to Ubuntu Discourse for Primary Support

2025-01-06 Thread Erich Eickmeyer
** Changed in: edubuntu-menu (Ubuntu Plucky) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2093141 Title: [SRU] Switch from Ask Ubuntu to Ubuntu Discourse

[Bug 2093141] [NEW] [SRU] Switch from Ask Ubuntu to Ubuntu Discourse for Primary Support

2025-01-06 Thread Erich Eickmeyer
negative reactions "edge cases". ** Affects: edubuntu-menu (Ubuntu) Importance: Medium Assignee: Erich Eickmeyer (eeickmeyer) Status: In Progress ** Affects: edubuntu-menu (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: High Assignee: Erich Eickmeyer (eeickmeyer) Stat

[Bug 2093140] Re: [SRU] Switch from Ask Ubuntu to Ubuntu Discourse for Primary Support

2025-01-06 Thread Erich Eickmeyer
** Changed in: ubuntustudio-menu (Ubuntu Jammy) Assignee: (unassigned) => Erich Eickmeyer (eeickmeyer) ** Changed in: ubuntustudio-menu (Ubuntu Noble) Assignee: (unassigned) => Erich Eickmeyer (eeickmeyer) ** Changed in: ubuntustudio-menu (Ubuntu Oracular) Assignee: (unas

[Bug 2093140] [NEW] [SRU] Switch from Ask Ubuntu to Ubuntu Discourse for Primary Support

2025-01-06 Thread Erich Eickmeyer
so far, I'd consider negative reactions "edge cases". ** Affects: ubuntustudio-menu (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Erich Eickmeyer (eeickmeyer) Status: New ** Affects: ubuntustudio-menu (Ubuntu Jammy) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Erich Eickm

[Bug 1638541] Re: Kcolorchooser doesn't save a new customer defined color

2025-01-06 Thread Erich Eickmeyer
Thank you for reporting this bug to Ubuntu. Ubuntu 16.10 (yakkety) reached end-of-life on July 20, 2017. See this document for currently supported Ubuntu releases: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Releases We appreciate that this bug may be old and you might not be interested in discussing it anymore. Bu

[Bug 2069367] Re: abourt of do-release-upgrade for update to noble

2025-01-03 Thread Erich Eickmeyer
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug. Ubuntu 23.10 reached end-of-life in July 2024, and there will be no further support for upgrades from this release. There are numerous bug reports, and we don't always get to all bug reports in time, so we do apologize for this. ** Changed in: ub

[Bug 2069509] Re: while attempting an upgrade, it failed to do it

2025-01-03 Thread Erich Eickmeyer
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2078639 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2078639 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 2078639 Ubuntu Studio upgrade, pipewire <-> pulseaudio conflict -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is sub

[Bug 2078540] Re: dist upgrade halts when calculating changes

2025-01-03 Thread Erich Eickmeyer
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2078639 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2078639 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 2078639 Ubuntu Studio upgrade, pipewire <-> pulseaudio conflict -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is sub

[Bug 2078505] Re: Upgrade auf 24.04.1

2025-01-03 Thread Erich Eickmeyer
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2078639 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2078639 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 2078639 Ubuntu Studio upgrade, pipewire <-> pulseaudio conflict -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is sub

[Bug 2083566] Re: LTS upgrade fails for Ubuntu Studio

2025-01-03 Thread Erich Eickmeyer
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2078639 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2078639 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 2078639 Ubuntu Studio upgrade, pipewire <-> pulseaudio conflict -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is sub

[Bug 2079817] Re: Jammy to Noble ubuntu studio upgrade fails

2025-01-03 Thread Erich Eickmeyer
See comment 7 in LP: #2078639 ** Changed in: ubuntustudio-meta (Ubuntu) Status: New => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2079817 Title: Jammy to Noble ubuntu studio upg

[Bug 2080550] Re: Update from Ubuntu 22.04 LTS to 24.04 LTS. Error on calculating downloading software

2025-01-03 Thread Erich Eickmeyer
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2078639 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2078639 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 2078639 Ubuntu Studio upgrade, pipewire <-> pulseaudio conflict -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is sub

[Bug 2081641] Re: Error during upgrade that asked me to report it

2025-01-03 Thread Erich Eickmeyer
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2078639 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2078639 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 2078639 Ubuntu Studio upgrade, pipewire <-> pulseaudio conflict -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is sub

[Bug 2080717] Re: crached on upgrade to 24.00

2025-01-03 Thread Erich Eickmeyer
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2078639 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2078639 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 2078639 Ubuntu Studio upgrade, pipewire <-> pulseaudio conflict -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is sub

[Bug 2081680] Re: Could not calculate the upgrade An unresolvable problem occurred while calculating the upgrade. This was likely caused by: * Unofficial software packages not provided by Ubuntu Pleas

2025-01-03 Thread Erich Eickmeyer
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2078639 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2078639 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 2078639 Ubuntu Studio upgrade, pipewire <-> pulseaudio conflict -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is sub

[Bug 2080747] Re: upgrade failed while calculating upgrade

2025-01-03 Thread Erich Eickmeyer
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2078639 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2078639 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 2078639 Ubuntu Studio upgrade, pipewire <-> pulseaudio conflict -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is sub

[Bug 2081790] Re: Ubuntu Studio 22.04.5 upgrade to 22.04 fails with Cannot Calculate Upgrade

2025-01-03 Thread Erich Eickmeyer
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2078639 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2078639 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 2078639 Ubuntu Studio upgrade, pipewire <-> pulseaudio conflict -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is sub

[Bug 2084913] Re: upgrade to 22.04.5 fails, "unable to calculate upgrade"

2025-01-03 Thread Erich Eickmeyer
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2078639 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2078639 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 2078639 Ubuntu Studio upgrade, pipewire <-> pulseaudio conflict -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is sub

[Bug 2083750] Re: Unable to upgrade the system

2025-01-03 Thread Erich Eickmeyer
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2078639 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2078639 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 2078639 Ubuntu Studio upgrade, pipewire <-> pulseaudio conflict -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is sub

[Bug 2086558] Re: Upgrade crashed before dowloading packets

2025-01-03 Thread Erich Eickmeyer
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2078639 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2078639 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 2078639 Ubuntu Studio upgrade, pipewire <-> pulseaudio conflict -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is sub

[Bug 2085902] Re: Non riesco ad effetturare l'avanzamento di verisone

2025-01-03 Thread Erich Eickmeyer
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2078639 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2078639 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 2078639 Ubuntu Studio upgrade, pipewire <-> pulseaudio conflict -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is sub

[Bug 2089856] Re: upgrade keeps faily on studio ubuntu

2025-01-03 Thread Erich Eickmeyer
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2078639 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2078639 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 2078639 Ubuntu Studio upgrade, pipewire <-> pulseaudio conflict -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is sub

[Bug 2088363] Re: Ubuntu Studio upgrade to 24.04 fails with Could not calculate the upgrade

2025-01-03 Thread Erich Eickmeyer
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2078639 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2078639 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 2078639 Ubuntu Studio upgrade, pipewire <-> pulseaudio conflict -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is sub

[Bug 2092915] Re: Update to Ubuntu 24 fails because certain core components are on a list of files that shall not be changed.

2025-01-03 Thread Erich Eickmeyer
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2078639 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2078639 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 2078639 Ubuntu Studio upgrade, pipewire <-> pulseaudio conflict -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is sub

[Bug 2092960] Re: do-release-upgrade crashed upgrading Ubuntu Studio to 24.04

2025-01-03 Thread Erich Eickmeyer
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2078639 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2078639 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 2078639 Ubuntu Studio upgrade, pipewire <-> pulseaudio conflict -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is sub

[Bug 2063899] Re: [SRU] Users are not initially configured properly for audio in Ubuntu Studio

2025-01-02 Thread Erich Eickmeyer
ubuntustudio-default-settings 24.04.26.6 indeed fixes the build issue. Has for quite some time now. ** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-noble ** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-noble -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bug

[Bug 2078639] Re: Ubuntu Studio upgrade, pipewire <-> pulseaudio conflict

2025-01-02 Thread Erich Eickmeyer
Unfortunately, adding pipewire-audio as a recommends to ubuntustudio- meta simply does not work as it produces the exact same result as it doesn't force pipewire-audio to be installed. Julian: Adding pipewire-audio as a *depends* is simply not an option for Ubuntu Studio as, at least for 24.04, th

[Bug 2078639] Re: Ubuntu Studio upgrade, pipewire <-> pulseaudio conflict

2025-01-02 Thread Erich Eickmeyer
Unfortunately, adding pipewire-audio as a recommends to ubuntustudio- meta simply does not work as it produces the exact same result as it doesn't force pipewire-audio to be installed. Julian: Adding pipewire-audio as a *depends* is simply not an option for Ubuntu Studio as, at least for 24.04, th

[Bug 2078639] Re: Ubuntu Studio upgrade, pipewire <-> pulseaudio conflict

2025-01-02 Thread Erich Eickmeyer
I was able to reproduce this in a newly-installed and upgraded 22.04 VM. I'm attempting to see if adding pipewire-audio as a recommends to the ubuntustudio-desktop meta fixes it. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >