[Bug 653714]

2019-12-05 Thread Emil-l-velikov
agpmode and modeset are not even remotely related I'm afraid. With 4.3 onward one should be using nouveau.config="NvAGP=0" as documented [1] [1] http://nouveau.freedesktop.org/wiki/KernelModuleParameters/#config -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which

[Bug 1275042]

2016-01-09 Thread Emil-l-velikov
(In reply to joro-2013 from comment #16) > Allow me to add my experiences. > > Whether the colors are garbled on PPC depends on the GL color format used > (among probably a gazillion other parameters :-). Packed (16-bit) formats > have been broken on big-endian for some time, they worked fine in m

[Bug 1371636]

2014-10-04 Thread Emil-l-velikov
(In reply to comment #11) > With Gentoo vanilla binutils 2.24-r3 with two slim LTO patches and the patch > referred by Emil Velikov in Comment #3 > > https://projects.archlinux.org/svntogit/packages.git/plain/trunk/binutils-2. > 24-shared-pie.patch?h=packages/ > binutils&id=47bdd59a9967ee8dd2bcc47

[Bug 1371636]

2014-09-29 Thread Emil-l-velikov
Building OpenCL works like a charm here. Can you try to establish which (if any) of the following components is responsible - llvm, gcc (*cough* 4.9.2_alpha) binutils or clang. I'm building it on Archlinux (llvm 3.5.0, gcc 4.9.1 (snapshot 4.9-20140903), binutils 2.24 [1], clang 3.5.0). [1] The bi

[Bug 1371636]

2014-09-29 Thread Emil-l-velikov
(In reply to comment #4) > I tested it with LLVM 3.4.2 and the same set of gcc-4.9.2 (svn) and binutils > (svn) used to open this bug report and all built fine. It may be that llvm 3.5 + mesa is "using" gcc/binutils in a slightly different way. Can you try using the same versions as the one I've l

[Bug 1196049]

2013-09-02 Thread Emil-l-velikov
(In reply to comment #3) > Do you really understand that Nvidia-based 1500-3000$ laptop may be really > killed by overheat with pretty non-binary / no-blob / GPL-friendly > opensource driver? Are you kidding? :) > The temperatures you've mentioned will not kill your laptop. > OK, Ilia. Where do y

[Bug 921321]

2012-10-22 Thread Emil-l-velikov
Created attachment 68764 Enable the PANEL_BACKLIGHT_LEVEL GPIO Guys can you try the patch. It should apply against the latest nouveau tree -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/921321 Title:

[Bug 921321]

2012-10-11 Thread Emil-l-velikov
It appears that even the blob was experiencing the same issue [1] Affected blob 180.44, fixed in 180.60. I would expect that a specific quirk was added to handle the issue [1] http://www.bartromgens.org/wordpress/?p=274 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bu

[Bug 951331]

2012-07-10 Thread Emil-l-velikov
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 41333 *** -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/951331 Title: X does not start on GT240 To manage notifications about this bug go to: http

[Bug 921321]

2012-02-17 Thread Emil-l-velikov
Did you have the chance to test a kernel that includes the following commit "drm/nouveau/gpio: reimplement as nouveau_gpio.c, fixing a number of issues" It does rework the gpio handling and initialization (among other things), that should have positive effect on your issue It is part of linux

[Bug 925048]

2012-02-08 Thread Emil-l-velikov
Hello Bryce Here are some tips that will help triage the issue * Is the person using "3d" - try reproducing the issue without it Disable AIGLX in the X server (Re)move the file (or package providing it) "/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/dri/nouveau_dri.so" * Try booting with "nouveau.nofbaccel=0" * A

[Bug 754711]

2011-12-07 Thread Emil-l-velikov
According to the latest dmesg (in comment #47) Nouveau fails to "Suspend the GPU objects" due to NOMEM (-12 reported in the log), I.e. nouveau fails to vmalloc(gpuobj->size), that is needed to store current gpu objects (so that they can be restored after resume) -- You received this bug notific

[Bug 553789]

2011-12-03 Thread Emil-l-velikov
For anyone still experiencing this bug, here is a possible workaround (thanks to ColdFeetBob for pointing it out) Modify* /xserver/mi/mieq.c and rebuild xserver * Increase the "#define QUEUE_SIZE 512" to 1024, 2048 or 4096 [1] Note that this is *not* a proper fix as you can see in the discussion