What are the plans for a release to bionic?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1928010
Title:
Occasionally crashes in _relocate() on arm64
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
h
It looks like https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-
jmespath/0.9.5-1 addresses this issue, from Groovy and Sid.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1877792
Title:
jmespath SyntaxWar
Public bug reported:
As reported upstream
https://github.com/jmespath/jmespath.py/issues/201
Problems installing jmespath in Ubuntu 20.04 LTS
Setting up python3-jmespath (0.9.4-2) ...
/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/jmespath/visitor.py:32: SyntaxWarning: "is" with
a literal. Did you mean "=="?
To be more precise, this is happening on a Pi 4 running arm64 (64-bit
Arm). The upstream patch mentions "some Arm systems".
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1876624
Title:
rtl apps cras
Public bug reported:
There is a discussion at
https://www.reddit.com/r/RTLSDR/comments/ds73ow/rtl_process_being_killed_newbie_troubleshooting/
for reference.
When installed with the default librtlsdr-dev, the rtl apps crash
on Ubuntu 20.04 LTS with this error sequence. This example is from
rtl-t
For reference, this is the extensive upstream kernel discussion
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=201685
The filesystem corruption issue is real, not theoretical, and
was the extensive discussion of problems experienced during the early days of
4.19:
** Bug watch added: Linux Kernel
This data corruption issue was written about extensively here
https://lwn.net/Articles/774440/
as part of the early 4.19 days when a number of folks were seeing ext4
filesystem corruption as a consequence of the blk-mq bug.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubunt
This problem also reported at https://github.com/AdoptOpenJDK/openjdk-
infrastructure/issues/356
If someone who has seen this has done a workaround specifically for
Openstack I'd appreciate it.
** Bug watch added: github.com/AdoptOpenJDK/openjdk-infrastructure/issues #356
https://github.com/Ad
Thanks Dann. Scott is testing this and has found an additional issue,
but we're not sure yet whether it's directly related or independent.
He'll file a more detailed report or open another Launchpad as
appropriate.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, whi
Thank you. We will be testing this new kernel at Packet and will report
results.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1736593
Title:
ThunderX: TX failure unless checksum offload disabled
T
** Tags removed: verification-needed-xenial
** Tags added: verification-done-xenial
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1661222
Title:
syscall.Getpagesize returns wrong page size on aarch6
Michael - I'm able to test this, but I need to set up a fresh machine to
make sure I didn't bodge one of the install steps.
Just to be clear, the xenial-proposed version is 1.13.1 based, and the
earlier PPA version was 1.12.x based, so this is newer code than what I
had first tested.
--
You rece
The test I ran was with
`golang-1.6/xenial-proposed,now 1.6.2-0ubuntu5~16.04.4 all
[installed,automatic]`
on an arm64 system. The test code is at
https://github.com/vielmetti/go-pagesize-test
With this version, I get the following results on a Cavium ThunderX
based Packet Type 2A system:
```
#
I've confirmed that the PPA provided by @mwhudson in #4 addresses the
crash reported in the issue.
I've also identified a simple test Dockerfile that crashes on an
unpatched system, and works properly on the new PPA.
https://gist.github.com/bdafb8e961f55b2533fee8fa5221d186 - rename as
"Dockerfile
This affects the trusty image for arm64 as well, noted at
https://github.com/docker-library/official-images/issues/3583 (which
referred me back here).
** Bug watch added: github.com/docker-library/official-images/issues #3583
https://github.com/docker-library/official-images/issues/3583
--
Yo
Hi @rkota - I was able to successfully install this version of Docker
from the PPA.
I'm working on a test setup that generates enough layers to prove out
the bug, and will report back when I get that.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscri
Thanks Raghuram - I'll put together a test based on the PPA.
On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 10:32 AM, Raghuram Kota wrote:
> Hi @Edward Vielmetti : Would it be possible for you to test the fix
> uploaded to PPA by mwhudson (comm # 4 ?) ? Thx!
>
> --
> You received this bug notifica
** Bug watch added: github.com/ros2/ci/issues #75
https://github.com/ros2/ci/issues/75
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1702979
Title:
Deeply layered Docker image problems
To manage
e:
>
> https://github.com/ros2/ci/pull/73
> https://github.com/ros2/ci/issues/75
>
> for which the only reasonable workaround now is to recommend to not
> use the system Docker but instead to get the latest-and-greatest.
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to
We've seen a second customer using ARM64 Docker 1.12.6 on Ubuntu running
into errors that could be explained by issue. Would it be possible to
triage it? Fixing the upstream Go bug and recompiling may be enough to
solve.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bug
** Bug watch added: github.com/ros2/ci/issues #75
https://github.com/ros2/ci/issues/75
** Also affects: docker.io via
https://github.com/ros2/ci/issues/75
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is s
Public bug reported:
Docker 1.12.x is built with a version of Go which contains a bug
(https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/golang-defaults/+bug/1661222)
in syscall.Getpagesize. As a result, Docker builds that create images
with lots of layers fail to behave properly.
If Go (golang) is fixed
I've alerted the maintainer of the build scripts for the Docker images,
here:
https://github.com/tianon/jenkins-groovy/issues/24
hopefully @tianon can help with a test build to validate that this
works.
** Bug watch added: github.com/tianon/jenkins-groovy/issues #24
https://github.com/tianon/
This gist demonstrates the issue on armhf, using a Docker
armhf/ubuntu:xenial image.
https://gist.github.com/vielmetti/a078426659cb11f54a9142a878c7982c
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/16
I can reproduce this bug on my Mac which should aid in confirmation for
`armhf`.
```
Edwards-MacBook-Air:~ emv$ docker run --rm armhf/ubuntu:xenial apt-get update
Unable to find image 'armhf/ubuntu:xenial' locally
xenial: Pulling from armhf/ubuntu
3ec2010dcf9a: Pull complete
a9ce7d83bdeb: Pull c
If I follow these instructions:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ARM/RaspberryPi
do I get a testable environment for this fix? If I read it right, it
looks like the Pi 2 (and not the Pi 3) is the supported target hardware
for armhf.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubunt
Is anyone testing armhf?
I ask because of this from @andrewhsu at Docker, at
https://github.com/docker/docker/issues/32335#issuecomment-292042111
> This issue is preventing the release of docker 17.04.0 for ubuntu
xenial on armhf. Ubuntu xenial on amd64 is fine, however, so packages
are available
Additional downstream impact is
https://github.com/docker/docker/issues/32335 , "unable to build docker
armhf ubuntu xenial", reported by @andrewhsu .
** Bug watch added: github.com/docker/docker/issues #32335
https://github.com/docker/docker/issues/32335
--
You received this bug notification
See https://github.com/docker-library/official-images/issues/2804 for
the Docker impact downstream, as the aarch64/xenial and ppc64le/xenial
official images are affected.
Fixing this bug allows this CVE http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-
security/cve/2017/CVE-2017-7184.html to be addressed on th
Are there before and after numbers for ThunderX that are easy to share?
I'm seeing
aes-128-gcm 78608.06k 167039.08k 239836.84k 268366.17k
277192.70k
with "OpenSSL 1.0.2g 1 Mar 2016" on Ubuntu 16.04 LTS aarch64 with "1.0
.2g-1ubuntu4.6", which almost certainly is a "with this patch" nu
Thanks Michael. I see that 1.8 release is out, and will look forward to
seeing that when it's ready on your archive.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1661222
Title:
syscall.Getpagesize
@mwhudson - when you are ready to test the PPA I am very interested in
giving it a spin on a dedicated ARMv8 test server.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1661222
Title:
syscall.Getpage
If Go 1.8 would be available via a PPA that would obviate the need for a
fix to Go 1.6.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1661222
Title:
syscall.Getpagesize returns wrong page size on aa
A backport of this fix, to 1.7:
https://github.com/golang/go/issues/10180#issuecomment-277004348
** Bug watch added: github.com/golang/go/issues #10180
https://github.com/golang/go/issues/10180
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
Also noted here: https://github.com/vielmetti/go-pagesize-test/issues/4
** Bug watch added: github.com/vielmetti/go-pagesize-test/issues #4
https://github.com/vielmetti/go-pagesize-test/issues/4
** Also affects: golang (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this
Public bug reported:
syscall.Getpagesize returns wrong page size on aarch64.
The code at https://github.com/vielmetti/go-pagesize-test exercises the
issue.
This is fixed upstream at 1.8 with
https://github.com/golang/go/commit/1b9499b06989d2831e5b156161d6c07642926ee1
Downstream, this affects Do
I was able to replicate this failure on an ARMv8 (aarch64) xenial
system, using the supplied instructions for QEMU and getting the
modprobe error.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1633629
I did an "apt-get update; apt-get dist-upgrade" on a multiprocessor
xenial amd64 machine, and was not able to replicate this bug.
Linux armv8hello.local.lan 4.4.0-38-generic #57-Ubuntu SMP Wed Sep 7
10:19:14 UTC 2016 aarch64 aarch64 aarch64 GNU/Linux
Ubuntu 16.04
--
You received this bug notifi
This bug is fixed in tidy-html5 v5.0.0, as noted here
https://github.com/htacg/tidy-html5/issues/256
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/589574
Title:
libtidy creates invalid tags
To man
There is a new version of Tidy (5.0.0) which has been released and which
is largely backwards compatible with the 2009 Tidy that ships right now.
See https://github.com/htacg/tidy-html5 for the source repository, and
this open issue
https://github.com/htacg/tidy-html5/issues/252
for the packagin
40 matches
Mail list logo
