In trying to do the work requested for the report, it took a different
turn. General sequence is still correct, with the following caveat:
- our DNS server added a CNAME record to the truncated UDP reply,
bringing the size to over 512 bytes
The response is well formed, just too big. Since getad
Public bug reported:
Programs using getaddrinfo will segfault downstack of the call in limited
circumstances.
We have limited this crash to a specific situation, some of these
details may not be relevant to the problem but are included in case they
are:
- getaddrinfo makes two requests, A and
I had the same issue after uprading from Ubuntu Gnome 17.04 to Ubuntu 17.10.
I "fixed it" by using Xorg instead of Wayland.
A colleague of me had the same issue in Arch Linux half a year ago. Always good
to know someone who is living on the bleeding edge :D
--
You received this bug notification
Public bug reported:
The current version of protbuf in the Ubuntu 16.10 Repository (3.0.0-7ubuntu3)
includes this bug:
https://github.com/google/protobuf/issues/2032
"Every message generates an unused parameter warning for bool
deterministic in ::google::protobuf::uint8*
::InternalSerializeWithC
I had a similar issue with Ubuntu Gnome after upgrading to 14.10. Had a
double mouse pointer, but only on the main screen, not on the two other
screens. Disabled screens one by one and renabled them and the problem
was solved. Don't know if this is related to your problem, seems more
like a gnome p
I now also added ionice to avoid a lot if io-load on the server being backed up.
My RsyncClientCmd now looks like this:
$sshPath -q -x -l backuppc $host /usr/bin/nice -n 19 /usr/bin/ionice -c2
-n7 /usr/bin/sudo $rsyncPath $argList+
-c2 is the "best effort" class and -n7 is the lowest priority in
"This symptom is not reproducible on fairly recent hardware."
Hmm. That's an interesting statement. First of all, BackupPC does not state
that we need "fairly recent hardware" in it's requirements:
http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/faq/BackupPC.html#requirements
And I heard PCs from 2006 (when the
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1030591
Title:
package initramfs-tools 0.99ubuntu13 failed to install/upgrade:
subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit
stat
Public bug reported:
Setting up initramfs-tools (0.99ubuntu13) ...
update-initramfs: deferring update (trigger activated)
lzma: (stdin): Cannot allocate memory
dpkg: error processing initramfs-tools (--configure):
subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Errors w
Same problem here and Ilja's workaround fixed it. I think apt might
delete these files and try again when this error happens. As this seems
to be easy to fix automatically, I think apt should be able to fix it
without any user interaction.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a m
First: Please do not quote full entries. This bug report is already full
of hundreds of posts so we do not need to have all those fully quoted.
I did not want to distinguish between blaming and criticising. I simply
meant that canonical is not responsible for kubuntu.
Because kde is _not_ officia
@ Julio A. Garcia Lopez
Well, you blame Canonical for not updating Kubuntu, which I think is kind of
unfair. Canonical is responsible for Ubuntu. Kubuntu is more a community
project supported by Canonical.
Of course you can have a try with Debian, at least then there is no company at
all to blam
If I understand it correctly, having one zombie process running is not
much to worry about. It does not consume memory anymore. It only uses
one entry in the process table. So if you have 1 zombie, you only have
one process ID less available to start new processes. Unless you're
running thousands o
@Yusuf: have you tried disabling desktop effects? I think if you disable
desktop effects and the system still keeps freezing, e.g. while Flash player is
running, you have another problem.
You might be also affected by this bug, but I think you might have more
problems such as a hardware problem
Well, aren't there enough posts above that state which version works? I
recommend reading at least the top and bottom of a bug report to see
what it is about and if there is already a solution for a bug before
posting. If one did this, I doubt it would be possible to miss the
version which works. T
I just had to try it:
I installed maverick in VirtualBox. I used Ubuntu 10.10 Alpha 3 (the
beta-download-link wouldn't work), Desktop edition (maverick-desktop-i386).
After Installation I updated everything using apt (Synaptic crashed but worked
after it had been updated using apt), which nearl
Thanks chrstophe for the reply. As hardy is LTS and should be supported until
April 2011, I thought security patches should be included in the recent
packages. And I can't dist-upgrade this server as it's a vServer.
My home server is running lucid, though (and therefore affected with this bug).
Thanks Cristophe for your feedback. This proves that the new version fixes this
bug.
I just can't understand why such an important feature like SSL is kept unusable
in the stable ubuntu package of proftpd. I really get the impression, that
support of the proftpd-package in Ubuntu is not very goo
I had the same issue and "fixed" it like Claes Löfqvist explained. Worked
perfectly, thanks.
Additional hint: You can tell apt-get not to update this package ("pin" it) by
creating a file in /etc/apt/preferences.d (e.g. /etc/apt/preferences.d/proftpd)
with the following content:
Package: proftpd
19 matches
Mail list logo
