Many thanks Chris.
I just felt triggered by this closing because I remember how much pain
this bug caused me while working in a data center back in the days. :)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.ne
Ok that is EOL but did you verify it is not the case in the newer
versions?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1006898
Title:
[SRU] dnsmasq fails at leasing issues when using vlan mode
T
Public bug reported:
I just want to have virt-manager + libvirt running.
it seems like /etc/libvirt/qemu.conf doesn't exist (the folder does).
but reinstalling libvirt doesn't fix that either.
Interestingly my laptop's 13.10 works just fine, however, this 13.10
install here was a clean install t
I am also running in this problem, and _netdev didn't fix it, and as the
other guy said, right after booting, doing a `mount -a` mounts the /home
just fine.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bug
"on a fresh install of ubuntu 12.04 with the ubuntu cloud repositories
added (for folsom) I also run into this error." (posted to a duplicated
bug just now) :)
** Also affects: ubuntu
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** No longer affects: ubuntu
--
You received this bug notification
apport information
** Attachment added: "UdevLog.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1087466/+attachment/3453428/+files/UdevLog.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1087466
Title:
apport information
** Attachment added: "WifiSyslog.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1087466/+attachment/3453429/+files/WifiSyslog.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1087466
Ti
apport information
** Attachment added: "UdevDb.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1087466/+attachment/3453427/+files/UdevDb.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1087466
Title:
ke
apport information
** Attachment added: "ProcInterrupts.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1087466/+attachment/3453425/+files/ProcInterrupts.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/108
apport information
** Attachment added: "ProcModules.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1087466/+attachment/3453426/+files/ProcModules.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1087466
apport information
** Attachment added: "ProcEnviron.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1087466/+attachment/3453424/+files/ProcEnviron.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1087466
apport information
** Attachment added: "ProcCpuinfo.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1087466/+attachment/3453423/+files/ProcCpuinfo.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1087466
apport information
** Attachment added: "Lspci.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1087466/+attachment/3453422/+files/Lspci.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1087466
Title:
kern
apport information
** Attachment added: "CurrentDmesg.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1087466/+attachment/3453421/+files/CurrentDmesg.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1087466
apport information
** Attachment added: "BootDmesg.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1087466/+attachment/3453420/+files/BootDmesg.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1087466
Titl
apport information
** Package changed: linux (Ubuntu) => ubuntu
** Package changed: ubuntu => linux-meta (Ubuntu)
** Tags added: apport-collected
** Description changed:
Hey,
when running the haproxy server with splice feature enabled on a high
traffic server, we're getting the follow
I did run `apport-collect 1087466` on the node in question, added my
personal LP account data it requested, and it then did show me an error
message like "No packages found matching linux.", unfortunately.
The trace above is not just in the dmesg output but also logged in
/var/log/messages. What
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1087466
Title:
kernel splice() bug being caused by haproxy
To manage notifications
Public bug reported:
Hey,
when running the haproxy server with splice feature enabled on a high
traffic server, we're getting the following message in the kernel logs
being spammed:
[107728.178357] WARNING: at /build/buildd/linux-3.2.0/net/ipv4/tcp.c:1201
tcp_cleanup_rbuf+0x54/0x120()
[107728.1
so what is the actual syntax for OpenStack Essex?
I also did not find anything in the docs (maybe I am blind) that you can
specify a hostname as part of the availability zone's name.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
htt
can at least one of all of you, saying "crashed badly", tell me what you
exactly mean? I am looking into using Btrfs for data storage and ideally
with Ceph, and I'd like to know what you mean by just the word "crash"
and how current this state is :-)
--
You received this bug notification because
Stephane, ya, as a workaround (not to say: the better way), modprobe'ing
"vhost_net" driver before actually starting the VMs works perfect. no
incidents since 4 days now (tested on 30+ VMs).
But is your driver-tag for? I did not need to do that, my libvirt-bin
added the vhost=on parameter to qemu-
So is it a bug in the VM's networking driver or in the hypervisor ?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/997978
Title:
KVM images lose connectivity with bridged network
To manage notificat
And that means what?
Will you (Ubuntu) ignore the bug and leave the patching up to the
libvirt/lxc Ubuntu users?
I am confused. :-)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1006898
Title:
[SR
I am having the same issue, and gave an in-depth inspection in my
report: bug 1016848
I am running version Essex 2012.1, and networking in VlanManager mode, a
dedicated nova-network gateway, KVM and virt-type, Ubuntu 12.04 Precise,
and run into this incident in up to every 1-2 days, yesterday even
happened twice last day, again.
`nova boot $INSTANCE` worked around it.
What can I do?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1016848
Title:
KVM instance stops communicating after some time
Public bug reported:
I am running a single nova-network node as gateway, and have about 20
KVM instances spreaded over 4 compute nodes (one of them is also
controller node), and everything is Ubuntu 12.04 LTS.
>From time to time one or another instance WILL loose connectivity, that
is, it still h
> Could this be more safely worked-around in openstack?
forgot to comment on this one, well, I am no OpenStack expert, however,
OpenStack nova-network relies on dnsmasq for propagating IP addresses
via DHCP to their (KVM/...) instances, and OpenStack supports simple
networking (w/o VLAN) and VLAN-
Hey,
sorry, with "most" I meant "the documentation recommends using
VlanManager" (that is, VLAN mode) for networking.
Although, you cannot "rely" on such a behaviour, IMHO, because it
absolutely makes no sense to let hosts (that send a DHCPREQUEST) not
receive their DHCPACK.
--
You received thi
Hey, thanks, and now I also found this one:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/1006898
which is exactly what I was talking about (interesting that I didn't
find earlier).
However, the last commenter says he's pulling it into precise "next
days", but this is about 2 weeks ago.
p.s.: I am new to launchpad, and I don't find the UI that intuitive
(talking about ticket states), so please apology if I rate "states" the
wrong way.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1013
Hey,
please do not mark this as "INVALID", as this is a major bug in
production environments, and since I am talking about 12.04 LTS
(Precise) this MUST be respected to get fixed.
Otherwise one might Ubuntu 12.04 LTS Precise not as Enterprise and would
result in not using Ubuntu in datacenters an
bug to cause VM instances to fatally loose their IP address, I
would highly rate this a major issue, and request a version bump in Ubuntu
12.04 LTS.
Ubuntu 12.04 LTS seems to just provide 2.59-4 in precise/universe.
Best regards,
Christian Parpart.
[1] http://osdir.com/ml/openstack-cloud
** Package changed: ubuntu => nova
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1004774
Title:
nova-compute won't start up after host reboot
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://b
Public bug reported:
in a multi-node setup, I was rebooting one compute node (having one active VM
alive),
after the hypervisor reboot, nova-compute tried to start up, but failed,
because it could
not set the MTU of the network interface br100, because this bridged virtual
interface does not ex
35 matches
Mail list logo
