[Bug 1430750] Re: Insecure Default Config leads to security issue

2015-03-13 Thread Christian Hertel
Just for completion: I just got a short answer from Kari Pahula pointing me to the corresponding Debian bug report: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=724746 Looks like the issue has been already fixed there in the same way I fixed it. Until now I accidentally that thought Debian

[Bug 1430750] Re: Insecure Default Config leads to security issue

2015-03-13 Thread Christian Hertel
Jonas: I will send a mail to Kari Pahula, which seems to be maintaining the tntnet package for Debian, and point him to this launchpad bug. Maybe he will give us some insights on why he changed the default configuration that way, review my changes and either adapt it to fix the tntnet Debian sque

[Bug 1430750] Re: Insecure Default Config leads to security issue

2015-03-12 Thread Christian Hertel
Jonas, for sure the suggested change is not the perfect solution and without any doubt there are many better ways to achieve the goal. Unfortunately I do not have the time to evaluate all possible options, I just wanted to suggest a change to provide a default configuration (which is as close t

[Bug 1430750] Re: Insecure Default Config leads to security issue

2015-03-12 Thread Christian Hertel
Sorry, I was unable to find a way to edit my last posting: > The default configuration in this packages is not xml format and therefor different to the one where all the patches in the existing > tntnet source deb package were built on. I meant the default configuration file (etc/tntnet/tntnet.co

[Bug 1430750] Re: Insecure Default Config leads to security issue

2015-03-11 Thread Christian Hertel
@Jonas: Upstream seems to be based on the following sources: http://www.tntnet.org/download/tntnet-2.0.tar.gz The default configuration in this packages is not xml format and therefor different to the one where all the patches in the existing tntnet source deb package were built on. I chose to a

[Bug 1430750] Re: Insecure Default Config leads to security issue

2015-03-11 Thread Christian Hertel
As requested, I have created a debdiff (my first debdiff so far) which seems to fix this issue in our case. ** Patch added: "tntnet_2.0+dfsg1-2ubuntu1.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tntnet/+bug/1430750/+attachment/4341332/+files/tntnet_2.0%2Bdfsg1-2ubuntu1.debdiff -- You

[Bug 232139] Re: [hardy] module-assistant fails to compile drbd0.7-module

2008-10-24 Thread Christian Hertel
My point was exactly the same as James mentioned, I had a server which only has drbd0.7 and liked to upgrade it. But in my opinion, the is no need to make it work in intrepid, but if drbd0.7 will be removed from the distribution, this should be mentioned in the release notes, so that people may be

[Bug 232139] [NEW] [hardy] module-assistant fails to compile drbd0.7-module

2008-05-20 Thread Christian Hertel
Public bug reported: Steps to reproduce: - Set up a new system using Ubuntu Hardy Server Install-CD - Install and start module-assistant - Select the following menu options in this order: UPDATE, PREPARE (install necessary packages), SELECT - Select "drbd0.7-module", the the following menu optio