[Bug 1099828] Re: Tab bar is not displayed when there is only one page open in a window

2013-01-20 Thread Chip Bennett
I'll add to the chorus. Confirmed on: Version 23.0.1271.97 Ubuntu 12.10 (23.0.1271.97-0ubuntu0.12.10.1) I just updated today from Kubuntu Precise to Kubuntu Quantal. This bug did NOT appear in the version of Chromium in Precise: chromium-browser (23.0.1271.97-0ubuntu0.12.04.1) So, this is appare

[Bug 576883] Re: kmail fetches mails repeatedly (POP3)

2010-05-18 Thread Chip Bennett
Trying to do due diligence. Linking an upstream bug report that appears to be related. ** Bug watch added: KDE Bug Tracking System #230072 http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=230072 ** Also affects: kdepim via http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=230072 Importance: Unknown Status:

[Bug 576883] Re: kmail fetches mails repeatedly (POP3)

2010-05-18 Thread Chip Bennett
I can confirm that I did *not* have this problem with Karmic, but did so, upon upgrade to Lucid. How is this an upstream bug that is somehow invalid for Kubuntu? If it were upstream, wouldn't it have showed up before, with everyone using the KDE SC PPA? I believe this bug should be re-opened as va

[Bug 298578] [NEW] Amarok not automatically downloading podcasts

2008-11-15 Thread Chip Bennett
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: amarok Using Amarok 1.4.9.1, KDE 3.5.10, Kubuntu Hardy: Amarok -> Playlists -> Podcasts Several podcast subscriptions have the option (under "Configure" in the context menu) "Download when available" selected (as opposed to "Stream or Download on reques

Re: [Bug 269656] Re: AN IRRELEVANT LICENSE IS PRESENTED TOYOU FREE-OF-CHARGE ONSTARTUP

2008-09-22 Thread Chip Bennett
On Monday 22 September 2008 4:12:23 am Mark Shuttleworth wrote: > The question about what sorts of terms of service would be incompatible > with the spirit of free software is a very interesting one, and I know > there's lots of good debate and discussion going on within our community > and within

Re: [Bug 269656] Re: AN IRRELEVANT LICENSE IS PRESENTED TO YOU FREE-OF-CHARGE ON STARTUP

2008-09-20 Thread Chip Bennett
On Saturday 20 September 2008 4:18:03 pm Remco wrote: > How is the integrated Google Search service any different from the > integrated anti-phishing service? Both come with additional terms. Yet > Google Search is not debated here, while the anti-phishing services are. The significant difference

Re: [Bug 269656] Re: AN IRRELEVANT LICENSE IS PRESENTED TO YOU FREE-OF-CHARGE ON STARTUP

2008-09-20 Thread Chip Bennett
On Saturday 20 September 2008 12:18:12 pm Dragonlord wrote: > Anyway, this is > not about bashing mr. Shuttleworth, honestly, but we need to view things > from a realistic perspective. Agreed; attacking Mark Shuttleworth over this issue is unnecessary and unproductive. > Maybe Canonical has an >

Re: [Bug 269656] Re: AN IRRELEVANT LICENSE IS PRESENTED TO YOU FREE-OF-CHARGE ON STARTUP

2008-09-20 Thread Chip Bennett
On Saturday 20 September 2008 10:57:20 am JohnFlux wrote: > > Dont enable the anti-phishing by default, but educate about how it can > > be turned on. > > As others pointed out, the people who most need anti-phishing are the > ones who are least likely to change the settings :-) I respect that pos

Re: [Bug 269656] Re: AN IRRELEVANT LICENSE IS PRESENTED TO YOU FREE-OF-CHARGE ON STARTUP

2008-09-19 Thread Chip Bennett
On Friday 19 September 2008 8:39:41 pm kafpauzo wrote: > @ Chip Bennet: > However I don't agree with you that "non-free service" and "freedom" are > suitable terms for services. I think "free" causes confusion rather than > clarity. It sounds like you mean "free as in the GPL", to which the > neces

Re: [Bug 269656] Re: AN IRRELEVANT LICENSE IS PRESENTED TO YOU FREE-OF-CHARGE ON STARTUP

2008-09-19 Thread Chip Bennett
On Friday 19 September 2008 2:46:38 pm kafpauzo wrote: > The purists are worried that the software on Google's servers is > restricted. The purists feel that because Google hasn't released their > _server_ software, this makes Google's service non-free. They feel that > Firefox becomes non-free jus

[Bug 269656] Re: AN IRRELEVANT LICENSE IS PRESENTED TO YOU FREE-OF-CHARGE ON STARTUP

2008-09-18 Thread Chip Bennett
"I think you are pushing this too far. Each TCP package you generate uses services of lots of network hardware (and software!) which isn't free. That's why, among lots of other reasons, we have free software - so we can be sure our data is safe and we wouldn't give valuable information to someone w

[Bug 269656] Re: AN IRRELEVANT LICENSE IS PRESENTED TO YOU FREE-OF-CHARGE ON STARTUP

2008-09-18 Thread Chip Bennett
"I would have to respectfully disagree with Dragonlord; i believe that there is a large continuum of the freedom of software, akin to many things. Mozilla is a lot freer than many other web browsers out there, and they deserve props for that." Probably, most (at least those who can see the issue r

[Bug 269656] Re: AN IRRELEVANT LICENSE IS PRESENTED TO YOU FREE-OF-CHARGE ON STARTUP

2008-09-18 Thread Chip Bennett
"Have you tried the Gnome "deskbar applet". I recommend it. You can search Yahoo and Google directly from the panel, without ever touch a web browser." I use Kubuntu, thus KDE, so, no, I've not tried the Gnome deskbar applet. That said, the use of Yahoo and/or Google search services do not requir

[Bug 269656] Re: AN IRRELEVANT LICENSE IS PRESENTED TO YOU FREE-OF-CHARGE ON STARTUP

2008-09-18 Thread Chip Bennett
@Mark Shuttleworth "We could [disable the Website Services by default], yes, but I think that would be a significant loss. The services are not anti-virus (and hence of less value on Linux), they are anti-phishing. Unfortunately, the phishing virus affects the human brain and not the OS :-/ so I

[Bug 269656] Re: AN IRRELEVANT LICENSE IS PRESENTED TO YOU FREE-OF-CHARGE ON STARTUP

2008-09-17 Thread Chip Bennett
@aschuring: "Considering how things are now with the services agreement, I don't think it will be necessary to ship with them turned off." Caveat: I am still relatively new (slightly over a year) to Ubuntu, Linux, and FOSS - so please forgive any ignorance and do not take any of my comments or qu

[Bug 199789] Re: Package IceWeasel not in ubuntu repositories

2008-09-15 Thread Chip Bennett
In light of recent developments, please re-open this bug report for consideration. -- Package IceWeasel not in ubuntu repositories https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/199789 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mai