LinkedIn
Bug,
I'd like to add you to my professional network on LinkedIn.
- Chad
Chad Bernier
Graduate Student at GA Tech
Greater Atlanta Area
Confirm that you know Chad Bernier:
https://www.linkedin.com/e/egwl0p-hmlbvutw-3b/isd/1719914/mdJGqebh/?hs=false&tok=2LXvu
LinkedIn
Bug,
I'd like to add you to my professional network on LinkedIn.
- Chad
Chad Bernier
Graduate Student at GA Tech
Greater Atlanta Area
Confirm that you know Chad Bernier:
https://www.linkedin.com/e/v5h921-hmlbvvm1-29/isd/17199145633/l2Q0nY8L/?hs=false&tok=1STYE
I liked the app solution. I checked it out when I was using Ubuntu. I don't
have a linux right now, and I am not sure which I will pick when I put it on
again. I don't think this is an issue though. There are more important
things to work on. Screen savers haven't been necessary for years, and the
weird. i have a different problem. anyone know if there is a bug report?
When i have two screens (actually, only when the second screen is turned
on at boot), my window borders disappear only for maximized or near
maximized windows.
--
maximized window extent wrong with two panels on bottom scree
I would just like to say that I'd really like this package to be in
some kind of a repository. I find things in the "local or obsolete"
section annoying.
On 6/11/08, James_pic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> xFX: I thought you might like to know that the current version of gnome-
> screensaver can a
yea, ubuntu's decision to blacklist radeon mobilities and their decision to
not support fake raid 5, has really been causing me to doubt my choice of
ubuntu. I might try something else
.
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 10:13 AM, David Chamberlain <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I also have the Radeon Mobil
I'd like to meet these people who suggest to use just use linux software
raid. It has its purpose, and we would be using it if it fit the bill. The
computer with $500 worth of hard drives, the huge case and power supply
needed to run them, and all that jazz, is probably the best computer in the
h
no one in the ubuntu community seems to care. They don't aim it towards the
people who use raid5. they aim it towards the people who can't even
diagnose a compiz problem with their video driver.
There was that one guy working on the bug before. I was helping him, but i
lost access to the hardwa
oh i thought it wasn't enabled by default. I installed hardy a long time
ago, and have been using ubuntu since dapper beta. I thought you had to go
enable desktop effects. maybe I just had to go form minimal to custom or
something.
How many clueless people really run linux anyways? I know it is
Why do they need to be blacklisted in the first place? isn't compiz turned
off by default? If people turn it on, and run into problems, they can just
turn it back off. Why is it that difficult? If there are problems with the
liveCD, make an option to boot it with compiz turned off. It ain't that
your welcome. I thought it was a nice idea. However, you will have to do
it again every time compiz is updated, like it was again last night.
On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 9:13 AM, caribo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> My Radeon Mobility 7500 has always worked with Compiz
>
> ...FED UP WITH HAVING TO
i guess this isn't ready quite yet. I updated my compiz again and it
stopped working. It took me a few minutes to figure it out. I first
though it had to do with my new version of awn. this time i took an even
easier fix. i went into /usr/bin/compiz, went to the laptop detect
portion, and change
of a sudden.
>
> The computer also has trouble hibernating but that I blame on the
> debugging, since when doing the same thing without debug it hibernates
> fine.
>
> I'm attaching part of this log, if anybody's interested (which also
> shows failed hibernation a
its a good idea to buy a new battery every 18 months or so.
On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 7:49 PM, Ted Gould <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm going to mark this bug as "Incomplete" right now as asac's problem
> seems to be caused by hardware (old battery).
>
> If there are other people still seeing this
well it is your fault for buying a laptop with incompatible hardware.
people should be more careful. I didn't just get any bluetooth adapter at
walmart, i bought a highly reviewed, linux compatible one.
On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 4:25 PM, Travis Watkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> The X300 is also
how do you get the new pulse audio to work? It doesn't show up in the
audio output list.
--
vlc pulseaudio support
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/196417
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubunt
how do you get a mobility card installed into a desktop? aren't they
different sizes and connectors?
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 5:34 PM, Eduardo Jose Moreira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I have a desktop, not a laptop, with an ATI Radeon 9600 XT Mobility
> (card bought separately, it was cheap).
>
did you try to load the module first?
sudo modprobe dm-raid4-5 or something like that.
On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 7:06 PM, Stavros Korokithakis <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am running the Hardy beta at the moment and I can confirm that it
> doesn't work. This is my output:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
nothing new there. flash has been unstable for months. We can only hope
that Adobe fixes it soon.
On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 6:16 PM, Jovan Svorcan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Tish usually happens while I'm watching youtube.
>
> --
> firefox-3.0 crashed with SIGSEGV in g_slice_alloc()
> https://b
I vote that they unblacklist the working ones first. that's top priority.
after that people can worry about trying to fix the drivers, but that is a
big project.
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 5:39 PM, Timo Jyrinki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> @Sergio: Ubuntu does not recommend using closed source driv
well a lot of people have said it, but ok.
** Attachment added: "lspci-vn"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12662713/lspci-vn
--
Need to whitelist multiple ATI cards, or remove blacklisting
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/201330
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubun
yea it is flash. flash hasn't been stable on linux for many months. we
have been waiting for adobe to release an update. silverlight doesn't
matter, people aren't going to rewrite everything already written. besides,
linux people hate microsoft products.
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 6:25 PM, Trabuco
01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Radeon Mobility
M7 LW [Radeon Mobility 7500] (prog-if 00 [VGA controller])
mine works fine most of the time. i won't be applying the patch until i know
how to overide it. please let me know. I don't use gnome-panel, i use AWN. I
can't l
I will not let you blacklist my laptop. I have been using compiz on
this since before compiz has even in ubuntu. Sure they are problems
sometimes, but they get fixed. How do i un blacklist it? i will not be
updating my computer until i know how to reverse this. I am completely
dependent on compi
it has been fixed for me for like a week or something. i am still having
trouble with firefox though.
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 2:38 PM, rah003 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Will do as soon as I get it again. I've thrown away previous report since
> it was known thing and I didn't know that you will
question. what is there to stop someone else from taking someone's
unlicensed work, adding their own license to it, and calling it theirs? how
do you prove copyright in cases like this?
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 4:43 PM, Conrad Knauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Adding to what Reinhard Tartler sai
it crashes on youtube frequently
--
firefox-3.0 crashed with SIGSEGV in g_slice_alloc()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/188540
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
http
good, you always should reboot. linux will let you reboot just the relevant
portion of the system, but only if you know how. Why do you want it to
suspend on low power? It will just continue to draw power in suspend mode.
It'll then turn off without shutting down properly. I'd rather set the
li
it has been fixed for me for like a week or something. i am still having
trouble with firefox though.
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 2:38 PM, rah003 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Will do as soon as I get it again. I've thrown away previous report since
> it was known thing and I didn't know that you will
here is a weird one. I load up a video in VLC, fine. I make it full
screen, fine. I set it back to windowed mode, and it crashes instantly.
when it's triggered this way, there is no crash report.
--
compiz.real crashed with SIGSEGV
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/183685
You received this bug n
Thank you for reporting that. You are not the first person to notice
this, but you are the first to say so in this bug. Hardy has been under
a much higher load all the time for me, just using firefox, flash, and
compiz keeps this thinkpad r51 quite busy. Earlier versions of ubuntu
ran just fine,
the lastest update appears to have helped. Before that update, it
crashed randomly, as evidenced by everyone else above. After the
update, it has crashed for me twice, both times at the same time firefox
crashed. We'll see how that goes. I wish i could get firefox to stop
crashing.
also, since
I've had this bug in gutsy and it is still in Hardy. I have a IBM
thinkpad r51. I don't mind it dimming my backlight on battery. However,
sometimes I want it brighter while on battery, and it should be my
choice. I override it with the buttons on the laptop, but it only stays
brighter for a coup
I spoke too soon. it crashed again today. I was just using firefox as
normal and it crashed. a crashed compiz really messed up my AWN.
--
compiz.real crashed with SIGSEGV
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/183685
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
Compiz crashed several times a day for me when I installed Hardy a few
days ago. That's how I found this bug. However, it has been updated a
couple times since then. Compiz has not crashed at all today or
yesterday. I currently have no real problems with hardy. I would like a
more stable flash p
I would be trying to get this fixed too, but I still don't have the
hardware, or know when I'll be getting it. They told me they'd try to have
it done in gutsy. I doubt Hardy will get it, because they will be
concentrating on stability. It could be a long way a ways.
You have a couple of choice
So that's any easy fix. Just switch it to default to percentages rather
than percent. Is there something wrong with that? IT's probably easier
than fixing the time reported issue. mine is now set to be critical at
3 and hibernate at 2%, the default percentages. Seeing how i get
somewhere betwe
just look at them. you kernel is 2.6.22-13.40 and your modules are
2.6.22-13.33
anyways, the modules load for me now, but don't bind to my network card.
I guess I'm stuck with ipw2200? how do i get a module for ipw2200 that
doesn't cause sleep problems?
--
iwl3945.ko missing
https://bugs.launc
I don't use ipw3945, I use ipw2200. is iwl3945 still a replacement for
it? Sorry about that double post, it must have been post data or
something.
how come modules is at version 32 and the kernel is at version 39?
--
iwl3945.ko missing
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/144501
You received this bu
nice try kyle, but that doesn't work.
[41600.328000] ieee80211_init: failed to initialize WME (err=-17)
[41600.356000] iwl3945: Unknown symbol iwlwifi_ieee80211_rx_irqsafe
[41600.356000] iwl3945: Unknown symbol iwlwifi_ieee80211_get_hdrlen
[41600.356000] iwl3945: Unknown symbol
iwlwifi_iwlwifi_ie
nice try kyle, but that doesn't work.
[41600.328000] ieee80211_init: failed to initialize WME (err=-17)
[41600.356000] iwl3945: Unknown symbol iwlwifi_ieee80211_rx_irqsafe
[41600.356000] iwl3945: Unknown symbol iwlwifi_ieee80211_get_hdrlen
[41600.356000] iwl3945: Unknown symbol
iwlwifi_iwlwifi_ie
same thing happens to me on my thinkpad r51.
I'm also having problems with suspend and resume.
--
display brightness resets and "flashes" on IBM T23 in Gutsy
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/137443
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contac
I can't help you with this bug anymore. The computer was not mine and
had to be returned to its owner. The owner will just have to live
without it for now.
It was using nvraid, but you already know that. I don't have the
computer with me to look up mobo model number or anything. I did try
comp
haha, sorry, tormod, but i failed to mention that I'm using x86_64. I
bet you gave me x86 modules. You should have asked though :)
--
dmraid set won't activate
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/110427
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug con
Something is wrong. I deleted all the modules in that directly after
backing them up, and added your new ones. I rebooted into the current
kernel as stated. I reboot the computer. It takes a long time,
complains about the lack of raid45, io buffer errors, and end of device,
as usual.
I manually
I don't really need this patch right now, how do i remove it?
--
make dmraid play nice with udev
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/106177
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.
certainly. just check out this bug.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-source-2.6.20/+bug/97655
It has the two patches and a discussion about it.
--
dmraid set won't activate
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/110427
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubunt
Yes, i know it can be done, I've heard of that awhile ago. I don't
think the Ubuntu installer is very good at that yet. You'll probably
have to manually create a bunch of partitions and everything. I haven't
been able to play with software raid myself because I always needed
windows on my deskto
Yea i figured something like a HTPC might have space limitations.
Lesley, unfortunately, the only way to do what you described involves
giving up Windows. I have assumed you want windows along with Ubuntu on
your PC, because you are using dmraid. If you won't be installing
windows, you don't need
Oh yea, Tom, your livecd doesn't work for me.
First, a small comment. It would be better if you included dm-raid4-5
on the initrd so people don't have to manually load it, quick fix.
Secondly, I loaded the module, all went fine. dmraid -s shows my array
just fine. But when i run dmraid -ay, no
No, that is unmountable. It complains that it isn't a valid block
device. I would love to try using the standard kernel with only the
needed modules changed. However, that is a bit too advanced for me, so
you'll have to provide instructions. If i just copied them over, it
would complain about wro
Lesley, I'm not sure if you can get the boot to work or not, but that
isn't your only option. You could simple use an additional Hard drive
to boot from, and keep all your data on the raid5 array. That's what
I'm attempting to do with this computer as it simplifies the
installation of any OS. Yo
I decided to test the live cd. That'll tell me if there is a problem
with the module or dmraid, or if i screwed something up with udev,
right?
--
dmraid45 target please
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/97655
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the
Is this related to udev? everything else seems to be working right.
--
dmraid set won't activate
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/110427
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.
Thank you Tom for doing this for us and for Ubuntu. I hope someone
picks up my other bugs, because my raid set won't activate properly.
lesley, It sounds like you want to BOOT off your raid5. That isn't
going to happen, not anytime soon. I hope you can get it working as a
data drive though. To
take something out of the CD, maybe Open office. It can be installed
after the install. I'd rather be missing something than waste a DVD.
--
dmraid45 target please
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/97655
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug c
I got past those problems and am having different ones now, as my bug
reports show.
you are still getting the raid45 error? Are you certain that the dm-
raid4-5 module is compiled AND loaded?
--
dmraid45 target please
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/97655
You received this bug notification beca
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: dmraid
I'm not entirely sure if this is a dmraid bug or not. I finally fixed
the problems of kernel modules. I have two custom kernels, 2.6.19 with
the 2.6.18 dmraid45 patch, and 2.6.20 with the dmraid45 patch provided
by Mandriva. I have no reason to bel
I hope they fix it this time. You can't see what else is going on
because those messages flood the system.
--
make dmraid play nice with udev
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/106177
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
-
it is not working anymore. This must be a bug in dmraid or something.
thanks for the patch.
--
dmraid45 target please
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/97655
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing li
he didn't respond when i tried contacting him, maybe he'll listen to
you. I'm using an nvidia chipset. I took his 2.6.18 patch and applied
it to a 2.6.19 kernel. it patched everything except one file, which i
manually fixed. That worked, but i want to use a 2.6.20 kernel.
It stopped working in
Richard, i made the sim link and put the module in the initrd, along
with the dm-raid4-5 module and there is no longer a problem of that
error.
I still get some hangs in the boot process but they are probably related
to something else.
--
dmraid looking for raid45 when kernel uses raid456
https:
Public bug reported:
I've been working with the developer's to test the proposed dmraid
support in gutsy.
So far i have fixed dmraid complaining about no raid5 support by
following these two bugs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dmraid/+bug/102973
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+sour
i don't think this is a problem with the raid45 patch right?
--
dmraid45 target please
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/97655
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
I'm not exactly sure what problem your patches are trying to fix. I
applied them anyways. I was hoping it would get rid of this problem.
I keep getting a ton of messages that look like this.
attempt to access beyond end of device.
any idea on how to fix those?
--
make dmraid play nice with ud
i tried to compile it into the kernel. I think it must be left as a
module.
I got it to compile as a module, but it still isn't working. Dmraid is
hanging as the other bug states. I still get a lot of errors about the
actual drives but that's another problem too. more to the actual point.
[EMAIL
thank you for making that effort Tom. I tried finding that patch myself
but it didn't work. Guess what? It still doesn't work. Here's what
happens when I try to build it. I hope the patch only needs minor
corrections.
CC drivers/md/dm-raid4-5.o
drivers/md/dm-raid4-5.c: In function ‘wake_d
Bishen, why are you using an old kernel and do you have the patch to
enable raid5?
I know we are trying to fix dmraid, but that isn't sufficient for raid5.
--
dmraid looking for raid45 when kernel uses raid456
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102973
You received this bug notification because you
But raid456 is already in the kernel. dmraid is having some kind of
other trouble. What is causing the 4 minute delay? I had everything
working in Edgy just fine. I had to compile the newest dmraid, and a
kernel, but it was working. now its broke in feisty.
by the time the feisty +1 is ready fo
Ok, it's not really any more broken than before. The computer does work
minus the raid of course. It still has the annoying 4 minute delay
during boot though. I tried both the official and your version. I even
made sure to do a complete uninstall between versions. I even updated
the initramd f
i tried this yesterday and it broke the computer worse. If i go back to
the lab today, I can try getting the computer to boot, otherwise we have
a serious problem.
--
dmraid looking for raid45 when kernel uses raid456
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102973
You received this bug notification beca
yea i forgot, i have plenty of reasons to go back to campus this weekend. I'll
test this today. just wish i had the dm-raid4-5 patch though. however, the bug
has been confirmed and added to the wishlist, so here's hoping it makes it into
fesity. maybe fesity +1 can have support in the installe
thank you. Unfortunately I am not at home to celebrate the weekend with
my friend Jack Daniel and some others. Hopefully i can get around to
testing it this weekend, if not monday when I'm forced to go back to
that computer. :)
yea I had the dm-raid4-5 module working for 2.6.19 custom compiled,
Can I please have the x86_64 version of that package?
Nox, you won't be able to get a raid5 array working with just this
package. I'd love the package though because there are other problems.
to get a raid 5 array working, you also need the dm-raid4-5.ko module.
Unfortunately, I can't find a patc
Can I please have the x86_64 version of that package?
Nox, you won't be able to get a raid5 array working with just this
package. I'd love the package though because there are other problems.
to get a raid 5 array working, you also need the dm-raid4-5.ko module.
Unfortunately, I can't find a patc
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-source-2.6.20/+bug/97655
This bug explains what's needed to get a Nvidia (and other chipset) fake
raid 5 arrays working.
--
dmraid looking for raid45 when kernel uses raid456
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102973
You received this bug notification
http://people.redhat.com/~heinzm/sw/dm/dm-raid45/
This is where the patch for 2.6.18 is located. I need someone to
rewrite the patch for kernel 2.6.20, as the author hasn't done so yet.
--
dmraid45 target please
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/97655
You received this bug notification because yo
Public bug reported:
Can you please enable the dmraid45 patch? The one that creates dm-
raid4-5.ko? I wouldn't mind resulting module being in a seperate deb
file, if you won't include it with the kernel. It's extremely
important.
** Affects: Ubuntu
Importance: Undecided
Status: U
78 matches
Mail list logo
