Public bug reported:
Libunistring is updated by FSF for every new version of Unicode. The
current version of libunistring is 0.9.6 and has support for unicode
version 9. The version shipped with Ubuntu is 0.9.3 which supports
Unicode 7. Since the lib was last updated Unicode has added more than
14
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/788556
Title:
package doc-base 0.10.1 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage:
subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit
stat
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: doc-base
I have no idea what this is about there was some kind of upgrade which
failed due to errors your logs should have the information you need
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.10
Package: doc-base 0.10.1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6
Ok, I was in the first two or five rounds of this discussion and I
have to say that at this point any further discussion is moot.
The real bug was that Mark and others did not consider the possibility
at people would hate the changed in the UI. And by hate, I mean,
running screaming in the street
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 532633 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/532633
On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 11:02 AM, running_rabbit07
wrote:
> *** This bug is a duplicate of bug 532633 ***
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/532633
>
> Miroslav Durian,
>
> Many people are happily using the
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 3:38 PM, Alexander Pas wrote:
> Dear Mark Shuttleworth, and everyone else thinking it was a good change
> to place those buttons on the left side of the window.
>
> Please go read a book on Interaction Design, for example: About Face 3,
> ISBN 9780470084113
>
> Now, After y
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 1:42 PM, running_rabbit07
wrote:
> Bob, your only reason for rejecting ubuntu's buttons is stubbornness.
You just relabeled my fact based objections as a form of moral failure
so that you could reject them without having to even consider that my
reasons may be valid. You ar
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 1:08 PM, Pako wrote:
> @Bob "Our reasons are real and valid" What reason?
Ok, I recognize a troll when I see one. Very funny. Ha Ha.
>
> --
> [Master] Window Control buttons: position/order/alignment
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/532633
> You received this bug notifi
Your post is nonsense. Nothing I said had anything to do with
"beauty". I was talking about how poor selections of colors can induce
eye strain and make it difficult to use a UI.
I am talking about well established principles based on decades of
experimentation and on the physiology eye and the ef
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 12:38 PM, scholli wrote:
> mouth (sorry)
>
> @Bob
>
> Yes with Windows... My first Computer was an Amiga and it was different.
> It was bad? Nop! You will wonder the quick you can change customs. ,)
You clearly have no understanding of what we have been talking about.
Step
Think about how your grandma would react if she had been using
computers since 1971 and an X11 based GUI with the window buttons in
the upper right corner since 1986. How would she feel if she did an
update, rebooted, and found that the buttons were not where she
expected them to be. And, she also
** Attachment added: "AptOrdering.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42181297/AptOrdering.txt
** Attachment added: "BootDmesg.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42181301/BootDmesg.txt
** Attachment added: "CurrentDmesg.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42181302/CurrentDmesg.txt
** Att
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: plymouth
Logged in. Started synaptic. Clicked on reload.
I scanned through the list of packages and saw that ubuntu-desktop,
ubuntu-standard, and ubuntu-minimal were to be upgraded. So I marked
those three for upgrade and clicked on apply. I should note
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 5:02 AM, Richard wrote:
> Clearly there are many people (including me) who don't like the new
> title bar layout, and the loss of the application's icon from the title
> bar - so as a minimum there should be a GUI way to easily revert to the
> older layout, and this should
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 4:12 PM, Mark Shuttleworth wrote:
> On 25/03/10 17:12, Atel Apsfej wrote:
>> Yes this is one of the fundamental communication breakdowns between the
>> closed door design team and the external community. Shuttleworth and
>> the design team want data.. but they haven't comm
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 532633 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/532633
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 3:43 AM, Mark Shuttleworth wrote:
> *** This bug is a duplicate of bug 532633 ***
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/532633
>
>
> @BobPendleton - there is no deci
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 532633 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/532633
There is a bug somewhere. I used the gconf-editor tweak to fix the bug on two
machines that were running alpha 3. I just installed beta1 on my laptop and
learned, the hard way, the the gconf-tweak has been
Is anyone working on this?
--
[Karmic] usplash crash after 10 second so text appears before xsplash
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/474720
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubu
Folks, this lock up appears to be affecting a lot of people who are trying
prerelease versions of hardy, if this thing goes public with this bug it is
going to be a *disaster* for Ubuntu. Is there anyway to get hold of the
people responsible and get the release delayed until this bug is fixed?
Ubun
I have the same hardware but with 512MB. I have the same problem. The
problem occured with alpha 4, alpha 5, and beta 1. After alpha 5 I did a
complete reinstall of 7.10, which works perfectly, and then did a new
install of beta 1 using update-manager -d.
It still locks up hard after 5 to 10 minut
20 matches
Mail list logo
