[Bug 975227] Re: Gnome-Terminal Launched in KDE Is Resized to Small Window

This is probably the same as https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=649680 You can work around this problem by going to System Settings -> Window Behavior -> Window Rules. Add a new rule called "Gnome-terminal workaround" which sets "Obey geometry restrictions" to "Force No". See the screensho

[Bug 880734] Re: gnome-terminal window changes size to one-line in KDE

This is probably the same as https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=649680 You can work around this problem in KDE by going to System Settings -> Window Behavior -> Window Rules. Add a new rule called "Gnome-terminal workaround" which sets "Obey geometry restrictions" to "Force No". See the

[Bug 694910] Re: Regression: patch to bug 539477 breaks Super+P keybindings

I ran into this problem and came up with a workaround using xsession and xbindkeys, see http://blog.n01se.net/?p=314 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/694910 Title: Regression: patch to

[Bug 537133] Re: mountall issues with NFS root filesystem

Steve, Scott, Thanks for looking at this bug and changing the portmap dep chain. However this only fixes one of the problems mentioned in this report, and NFS root clients are still broken. The mountall patch I provided above is still necessary (and I'm not sure that's even the end of the story).

Re: [Bug 419501] Re: apport-kde assert failure: python: ../../src/xcb_io.c:242: process_responses: Assertion `(((long) (dpy->last_request_read) - (long) (dpy->request)) <= 0)' failed.

unsubscribe -- apport-kde assert failure: python: ../../src/xcb_io.c:242: process_responses: Assertion `(((long) (dpy->last_request_read) - (long) (dpy->request)) <= 0)' failed. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/419501 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, w

[Bug 418509] Re: [Karmic] Hangs during shutdown with kernel 2.6.31-7

Sorry mf, that was my goof. :-( I'm subscribed to one or more of the dups because of this bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/malone/+bug/475775 As a result I was getting mail on this bug. So I read https://help.launchpad.net/Bugs/EmailInterface but I made a mistake. Now I've done it right, but not

Re: [Bug 418509] Re: [Karmic] Hangs during shutdown with kernel 2.6.31-7

bug 418560 unsubscribe bug 418573 unsubscribe bug 419056 unsubscribe bug 419297 unsubscribe bug 419378 unsubscribe bug 419385 unsubscribe bug 419393 unsubscribe bug 419402 unsubscribe bug 419664 unsubscribe bug 419670 unsubscribe bug 419680 unsubscribe bug 419753

Re: [Bug 518806] Re: Evince resets zoom if you navigate through pdf

unsubscribe -- Evince resets zoom if you navigate through pdf https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/518806 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailm

[Bug 485709] Re: /etc/init/mountall.conf fails when root is mounted using NFS instead of NBD

I don't use LTSP but I've found two major problems using nfsroots on Lucid, and probably Karmic as well: 1. By default NFS wants locking, which creates a circular dependency: rootfs -> statd -> portmap -> local-filesystems event -> rootfs -> statd -> etc. 2. To work around that problem, you can p

[Bug 537136] Re: try_mounts vs newly_mounted

** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40759135/Dependencies.txt -- try_mounts vs newly_mounted https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/537136 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mai

[Bug 537136] [NEW] try_mounts vs newly_mounted

Public bug reported: Binary package hint: mountall While reading mountall.c, I noticed what seems to be a minor issue. The while-loop in try_mounts() depends on newly_mounted=TRUE, but its initial value is FALSE until mark_mounted() manages to find something. While that will probably always be th

[Bug 537135] Re: mountall calls mount -a for every mount

** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40759011/Dependencies.txt -- mountall calls mount -a for every mount https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/537135 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubu

[Bug 537135] [NEW] mountall calls mount -a for every mount

Public bug reported: Binary package hint: mountall For example: spawn: mount -n -a -t nfs -o remount,nolock 16.1.1.2:/export/romano / I suspect that -a is a mistake. It's line 1702 in mountall.c from version 2.7 ProblemType: Bug Architecture: amd64 Date: Thu Mar 11 01:31:28 2010 DistroRelease

[Bug 537133] Re: mountall issues with nfsroots

** Patch added: "mountall.c.is_root.patch" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40758849/mountall.c.is_root.patch ** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40758647/Dependencies.txt -- mountall issues with nfsroots https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/537133 You received t

[Bug 537133] [NEW] mountall issues with nfsroots

Public bug reported: Binary package hint: mountall I think I've found two bugs in mountall-2.7 related to nfsroots. This report describes both, since working around one exposes the other. The first bug is a dependency issue, circular and otherwise. Unless the nfsroot is mounted with "nolock", NF

[Bug 490732] Re: KVM guests no longer start after upgrading host system from 9.04 to 9.10 (i386 only)

This is not a development issue, it's a support issue. You have a memory corruption bug (or something similar) in 32-bit kvm on Karmic, which is supported until April 2011. This bug should be marked confirmed, severity upgraded, and taken seriously. -- KVM guests no longer start after upgrading h