Running nm-applet fixed this issue for me - hoping this will get a more
permanent fix in time for the 11.10 release.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/863120
Title:
Cannot connect to VPN
For me it happened after I opened the Language Support dialog from the
system settings window.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/859961
Title:
gnome-language-selector crashed with Attrib
** Attachment added: "AptOrdering.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/44967615/AptOrdering.txt
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/44967616/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "Dmesg.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/44967617/Dmesg.txt
** Attachment
Public bug reported:
1. Ran Computer Janitor
2. Clicked "Do selected tasks"
3. Error.
ProblemType: Package
Architecture: amd64
Date: Wed Apr 21 19:31:38 2010
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10
ErrorMessage: error writing to '': Success
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 9.10 "Karmic Koala" - Release amd64 (200910
Confirmed this on both Jaunty and Karmic 32bit.
I understand that the reason Ubuntu puts a [NOTFOUND=return] before dns
is for performance reasons, however performance reasons should not cause
usability problems, IMO. At the very least, as a user, I expect a way to
control this behavior via some c
Isn't that what backports is for?
--
[Request] OpenOffice.org 3.0 in Intrepid Backports
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/267376
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
http
Andrew Conkling: I don't know if that's the reason people (mostly)
prefer Ubuntu - but I agree that the time-line is important.
bastafidli: I was aware you're talking about a different set of users;
and you are right in saying that the "tinkering" users (like you and I)
are the ones that DO care a
Hi.
I'm not affiliated with Canonical or Ubuntu, but wanted to contribute a
few points:
bastafidli wrote:
> I believe the decision to do not include OO.o 3.0 in 8.10 is
> 1. very bad publicity for Intrepid, when comparing Ubuntu with Fedora or
> Mandriva this is a
> huge argument why not to use
Allen Crider wrote:
> I would want any changes made to go into the Sun code where it
> would be maintained as part of the upstream version of the JVM.
Yes, you are right. I was only asking because I thought maybe it would be a
small patch, which Ubuntu manages quite a few, in which case it would
I'm not familiar with the internals of the JVM, but why does a JVM even
need its own database? Why can't it use the native OS's timezone
database, just like it abstracts many other OS services.
Although I'm a Java programmer, I firmly believe that managing the time
zone information is the system a
10 matches
Mail list logo
