I agree that this issue is really old. I am fine if you close it.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1314743
Title:
Screensaver activates and asks for password even though I have
disabl
Some have reported this at https://askubuntu.com/questions/1232868
/problem-installing-deb-in-software-install-ubuntu-20-04
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1908469
Title:
Cannot instal
Public bug reported:
Suppose in Firefox you click a link to a .deb package. A dialog named
"Opening [filename].deb" opens. If you select "Open with", then the .deb
file is downloaded, placed in /tmp/mozilla_[username]0/ directory, then
Software Install (as named in the Firefox dialog) is started o
I do not know if it's resolved because I switched to Firefox when
running Ubuntu, but I am fine with this being closed.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1030060
Title:
Chromium elevates
Public bug reported:
After upgrading from 15.04 to 15.10, if I slowly scroll down with the
mouse wheel, the content scrolls down correctly. If I rapidly scroll
down, the window's content scrolls up a few lines in a "rebound" after
the scrolling down is completed. It's enough so that if I start wit
** Attachment added: "Text-based interface that I get after resetting the
system"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cryptsetup/+bug/1396227/+attachment/4268110/+files/text%20based.png
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed t
Public bug reported:
With 14.10 running on VirtualBox, I cannot enter my passphrase. See the
attached image clipped.png. Nothing happens no matter what I press. I
have to hit reset, then I get a more text-based interface on the 2nd
time around, which I can use. See attachment "text based.png".
Th
In case it matters, I have to run Chromium using "chromium-browser
--disable-gpu" because of bug #1311172.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1334679
Title:
Scrolling in Ubuntu causes gar
Public bug reported:
When I scroll in Chromium, especially when I use the mouse wheel, I
often get a garbled screen. The attached PNG is an example from Drudge
Report, a site with pretty simple HTML. Note how the text is
discontinuous on the left and right sides.
In case it matters, I am running
I should update that unchecking "Enable 3D Acceleration" does not
reliably fix. However, running Chromium using "chromium-browser
--disable-gpu" does fix it, albeit making Chromium run noticably slowly.
Also reference http://askubuntu.com/questions/453475/chromium-display-
is-remanent-since-14-04-
Public bug reported:
In System Settings > Security & Privacy > Security, "Returning from
blank screen" (under "Require my password when") is unchecked. Also, in
System Settings > Brightness & Lock, "Lock" is set to "OFF", and "Turn
off screen when inactive for" is set to "Never".
Despite this, th
I solved by unchecking "Enable 3D Acceleration" in my virtual machine's
display settings. But there still appears to be a bug here that wasn't
present before 14.04.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad
** Attachment added: "chromium-browser.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium-browser/+bug/1311172/+attachment/4095392/+files/chromium-browser.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launch
I saw http://askubuntu.com/questions/453475/chromium-display-is-
remanent-since-14-04-upgrade-with-gpu-acceleration-enabled and noticed
how he got better results when using the --disable-gpu option. Indeed,
that appears to make Chromium not stay on top.
I've attached console errors and warnings I
Correction on #4: looks like I can interact with Chromium windows that
aren't on top, but only if I click on an area of the window that isn't
covered up by another browser. Bear with me: For example, suppose I have
three Chromium browser windows open with #1 in the front and #3 in the
back, and eac
Another observation: if I have multiple Chromium windows, I cannot
interact with a lower window unless I do something that causes the
window to move or resize. Simply clicking on the window doe snot cause
it to respond to anything, nor does it cause it to rise to the top of
the screen.
--
You rec
This is weird: when Chromium is in front of the lock screen (per #2
above), it's still updating. If I have gmail open, the window keeps
updating with new emails, chats, etc. as they come in, but I cannot
interact with it. This seems like a possible information disclosure
vulnerability as a lock scr
Even if the lock screen appears because I didn't interact with Ubuntu
for a while, the Chromium window still appears on top. I cannot interact
with Chromium, but the window is still drawn on top of everything.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
Public bug reported:
(This may be related to but not the same as 1030060 and 1173234.)
Chromium stays on top of other applications, even when it shouldn't be
drawn on the screen at all.
For example, if I minimize Chromium, it is still drawn as if it's on top
of other applicaitons. Even though I
That's interesting: clearing the session cache seems to have improved
things. I wonder if there is some odd interaction between the session
cache and Chromium?
After clearing the cache, the Chromium icon in the bar at top,
representing the background process, reappears whenever I reboot, but no
wi
Is there anything in a stock install of Ubuntu that would cause
applications to re-open if they were opened when Ubunutu was shut down?
I noticed that a session of Terminal Emulator is reopened if it was
running before I logged out or restarted. I wonder if the same process
is causing the double in
Then can you help me reassign this bug instead of closing it? I'm not
familiar with where to put it.
@strange_cathect: What distro are you on?
** Changed in: chromium-browser (Ubuntu)
Status: Invalid => New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, wh
This problem went away for a while, but it's now happening again a few
weeks after I installed Xubuntu 13.10. I am currently on Chromium
Version 30.0.1599.114 Ubuntu 13.10 (30.0.1599.114-0ubuntu0.13.10.2).
@alex: #7 is not an acceptable resolution. There is a bug if two
background processes are op
#9 is not an acceptable resolution, only a workaround. The background
process should not cause this problem.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1176903
Title:
Chromium browser window open
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1222718 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1222718
user@user-VirtualBox:~$ grep -i fglrx /var/log/Xorg.?.log
user@user-VirtualBox:~$ ubuntu-drivers devices
== /sys/devices/pci:00/:00:04.0 ==
manual_install: True
modalias : pci:v80EEdCAFEsv000
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1222718 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1222718
Chad, per comment #3 above, it looks like I do not have flglx?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1222718 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1222718
I don't think I have that. Per
https://help.ubuntu.com/community/BinaryDriverHowto/ATI#Installation_via_the_Ubuntu_repositories,
I should be able to run fglrxinfo to check on the status of that driver.
When
Public bug reported:
Chromium's tabs occasionally have blank titles. The attached example shows
blank tab titles for Ubuntu Launchpad, Autotrader, and CNN but properly filled
in tabs for other sites. I can reproduce on these instances:
-fresh install of Ubuntu 13.10
-upgrade of Xubuntu from 13.0
See attached image. You'll see that the Chromium window is showing a
distorted view of the www.cnn.com home page even though I have a
specific article pulled up. To the right are Mines and gedit. I clicked
on Mines and then gedit right before I took this screen shot to ensure
that they should have
Just did a clean install of Ubuntu 13.10. First thing I did was install
VirtualBox Guest Extensions, then I installed Chromium. Same problem:
the browser appears to stop responding because whatever is in the
browser window gets stuck in time and then occupies the top visibility
above all over apps.
Just to be clear,
http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=58083 is not the same
as this. I assume that's what Saikrishna noted by removing the bug
watch?
** Bug watch added: code.google.com/p/chromium/issues #58083
http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=58083
--
You rec
Public bug reported:
Per a discovery I made while working on 1176903, Chromium overrides
settings I make in Session and Startup > Application Autostart.
For example, suppose Chromium is completely closed, not even showing an
icon in the top bar for its background process. If I go to Session and
S
"you can delete that from the list of startup applications, although I don't
think that will solve your problem"
OK, I went to Session and Startup > Application Autostart, unchecked Chromium,
and rebooted. It still starts. In fact, when I go back to Session and Startup,
Chromium is once again ch
Yes, it is, but this is supposedly only for the background process as it
just runs /usr/bin/chromium-browser --no-startup-window.
I did not manually configure this, nor did I ever explicitly authorized
this, although I think it could be reasonable for the background process
to autostart.
--
You
Public bug reported:
When I start Xubuntu 13.04, a Chromium window opens after I log in to my
session. I have never configured Chromium to open a browser window
automatically. This happened even back with 12.10, before I upgraded the
instance to 13.04.
Note that this is not the same as #1175601.
Whoops, I don't know how to force monospace in this bugtracker, so I've
also attached a text file that preserves the whitespace.
** Attachment added: "ps.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium-browser/+bug/1175601/+attachment/3663001/+files/ps.txt
--
You received this bug no
ac@mule:~$ ps xfwww
PID TTY STAT TIME COMMAND
1731 ?Ss 0:00 /bin/sh /etc/xdg/xfce4/xinitrc --
/etc/X11/xinit/xserverrc
1804 ?Ss 0:00 \_ /usr/bin/ssh-agent /usr/bin/dbus-launch
--exit-with-session /usr/bin/im-launch startxfce4
1825 ?Sl 0:00 \_ xfce
Public bug reported:
When I log into my user session (type in my password on the login prompt
after boot), Chromium auto-starts, and two instances of its background
process automatically open: per the attached image, two Chromium icons
appear in the top bar. Also, an instance of the browser appear
Curiously, I just upgraded my workhorse Xubuntu VM from 12.10 to 13.04,
and that one does not have this z-order problem with Chromium. So far, I
can only reproduce on new instances.
Also, I should have stated this earlier, but in addition to Chromium, I
also installed the VirtualBox Guest Addition
/var/log/Xorg.0.log.old
** Attachment added: "Xorg.0.log.old"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium-browser/+bug/1173234/+attachment/3655134/+files/Xorg.0.log.old
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https:
/var/log/Xorg.0.log
** Attachment added: "Xorg.0.log"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium-browser/+bug/1173234/+attachment/3655133/+files/Xorg.0.log
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launc
The attached image shows what happens after the password screen displays
if it has been idle too long: the Chromium window still stays active and
on top, albeit unresponsive. While the Chrome Web Store tab is selected,
Chromium is showing the contents of the background tab named Extensions
(opened
The same problem happens on Xubuntu 13.04.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1173234
Title:
Chromium's content doesn't respect z order, obscuring everything else
To manage notifications
_UBUNTU_APPMENU_UNIQUE_NAME(UTF8_STRING) = ":1.121"
WM_LOCALE_NAME(STRING) = "en_US.UTF-8"
WM_ICON_NAME(STRING) = "Untitled Document 1 - gedit"
_NET_WM_ICON_NAME(UTF8_STRING) = "Untitled Document 1 - gedit"
WM_NAME(STRING) = "Untitled Document 1 - gedit"
_NET_WM_NAME(UTF8_STRING) = "Untitled Docume
Oops, please disregard #3. It's perhaps a related issue. I'll open a new
bug report.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1030060
Title:
Chromium elevates background to top z-order, obscuri
This is still going on with Ubuntu 13.04 and Chromium Version
25.0.1364.160 Ubuntu 13.04 (25.0.1364.160-0ubuntu3). See the attached
screen shot. Notice how gedit is above Chromium in z-order, but
Chromium's content displays over gedit.
Additionally, no mouse or keyboard input is accepted on this w
Public bug reported:
I have a fresh Ubuntu 13.04 install where I have installed nothing else
besides Chromium. When I go to Chromium's Chrome Web Store, its content
displays above everything else. In the attached image, note how gedit is
above Chromium, yet Chromium's content area is obscuring ged
1173234 could be a related bug.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1030060
Title:
Chromium elevates background to top z-order, obscuring Chromium and
all other windows
To manage notifi
Why was this marked as invalid by a bot!?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/923823
Title:
Add "Open file location" to right-click menu in file search dialog
To manage notifications abou
This shows Chromium's content area obscuring everything else.
** Attachment added: "chromium_obscuring.png"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium-browser/+bug/1030060/+attachment/3238904/+files/chromium_obscuring.png
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1030060
Title:
Chromium elevates background to top z-order, obscuring Chromium and
all other windows
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
htt
Public bug reported:
When I visit certain sites, especially LifeHacker (e.g.,
http://lifehacker.com/5929481/when-it-comes-to-exercise-inefficiency-
may-be-key), the content area does not show the site. Instead, the
content area shows the desktop background image, and it puts that part
of the backg
Related: #923823
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/914369
Title:
No reliable way to get file path after searching files
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launch
Note that this is a feature request.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/923823
Title:
Add "Open file location" to right-click menu in file search dialog
To manage notifications about thi
Public bug reported:
Per #914369, we're just now making it possible to learn the location of
a file that comes up in a search (when you open a **Home Folder** window
and search for a file using the search box at top right).
In the search results, please also add an **Open file location**
selectio
That's fine if ifupdown isn't at fault, but instead of closing this, we
need to reassign to what's at fault. The kernel?
** Changed in: ifupdown (Ubuntu)
Status: Invalid => New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
ht
Public bug reported:
When I open a Home Folder window and search for a file using the search
box at top right, there is no reliable way to discover the path of the
objects that the searcher found.
I can't see the path no matter what view I select.
I can't right-click and select anything that let
Has anyone ever opened a bug report on any app, ever, and it ended up
that they couldn't log in because their num lock key was on?
I'll bet the answer is either 0 or close to 0.
I feel we're stuck on a hypothetical that virtually never happens.
--
You received this bug notification because you
How many laptops really have that? My ancient Lenovo X60 tablet has that
feature, but my much newer HP Envy 14 doesn't.
Even then, how often do people really turn on num lock?
I'm concerned this warning is only for a tiny fraction of users--laptop
users whose laptops still have that feature _and_
Junking the numlock warning would solve #835649 and #841541, too.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/877456
Title:
Who cares about num lock?
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
The whole num lock warning should be junked. That would solve this. See
#877456.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/841541
Title:
"num lock is on" warning remains even after num lock is t
The whole num lock warning should be junked. That would solve this. See
#877456.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/835649
Title:
should warns about no numlock when entering password
To
Public bug reported:
The gnome screensaver is the only application I have ever used, ever,
that thinks that num lock being on is something I should be warned about
when entering a password.
This seems pointless as people generally do not change num lock during
computer use, or if they do, it's no
Changing to invalid. Further diagnosis suggests an unusual, temporary
problem with our DNS server.
** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.laun
Additional:
1. When this Ubuntu desktop was using DHCP, it was assigned the same DNS
servers as I manually assigned when converting to static IP. (They are our
enterprise's only two official DNS servers.) The vast majority of wired network
clients here use static IPs.
2. Running "nslookup" then
Public bug reported:
This is on a pretty clean install of Ubuntu 10.10 Desktop 64-bit.
Expected behavior: If I use System > Administration > Network Tools to switch
to static IP and static DNS settings, it should "just work."
Reality: System > Administration > Network Tools gets the static IP co
** Description changed:
I have a Ubuntu 10.04 LTS server with a NAT network adapter. It's a VM
under Oracle OneBox.
If I alter /etc/network and assign a static IP to eth1 and then do sudo
/etc/init.d/networking restart, I get this:
- * Reconfiguring network interfaces...
typos and clarification
--
SIOCADDRT error message misinforms user
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/638963
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/
Public bug reported:
I have a Ubuntu 10.04 LTS server with a NAT network adapter. It's a VM
under Oracle OneBox.
If I alter /etc/network and assign a static IP to eth1 and then do sudo
/etc/init.d/networking restart, I get this:
* Reconfiguring network interfaces...
Also experiencing this bug. Seems pointless not to set such a basic
environment variable.
--
JAVA_HOME should be set by default to /usr/lib/jvm/default-java
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/364794
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ub
Just figured out the problem: you have to press SPACE to activate the
current selection. The red icon made it look like apache2 was selected
by default. UI improvement needed!
** Changed in: phpmyadmin (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
phpmyadmin package does not work "out of the box"
ht
I reproduced again with 8.10. This is not incomplete--it simply doesn't
work out of the box. Additional configuration is necessary.
** Changed in: phpmyadmin (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => New
--
phpmyadmin package does not work "out of the box"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/159276
You
** Attachment added: "phpmyadmin web server config screen"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19076986/phpmyadmin_install.png
--
Remove then reinstall does not show web server config screen
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/291103
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: phpmyadmin
I am only prompted for the web server config screen of phpmyadmin on the
first time I install the program. See attachment to see what I am
referring to.
If I remove then reinstall phpmyadmin using aptitude, I do not see this
screen.
** Affect
OK, I flattened my VM and tried again from scratch so I could tell you my
steps. Here they are:
1. Install base OS using jeos-8.04.1-jeos-i386.iso.
2. sudo aptitude, install all updates and upgrades.
3. Still in aptitude, install apache2 and all dependencies selected by aptitude.
4. Still in aptit
Thijs wrote: "after installation, it asks which web server to
configure."
I removed phpmyadmin and then later reinstalled it using aptitude. At no
point did it ask me what server I am running.
--
phpmyadmin package does not work "out of the box"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/159276
You receive
Just want to say I tried it again this time with
jeos-8.04.1-jeos-i386.iso. I then loaded aptitude and installed apache2,
phpmyadmin, and all parts they require.
Yet again, phpmyadmin fails to work out of the box. I checked all
relevant files under /etc/apache2, and I could find no reference to
ph
Sorry, not sure what you mean by that.
--
phpmyadmin package does not work "out of the box"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/159276
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
OK, finally was able to test out again. I am running a fairly fresh,
clean install of Ubuntu 8.04. This is a clean install, not an upgrade
from something else.
I installed phpmyadmin, the latest package, using aptitude.
I immediately went to /etc/apache2/conf.d and noticed that, again, no
symboli
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: phpmyadmin
See http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?p=3683702. The phpmyadmin
package is missing a symbolic link that would make it work.
** Affects: phpmyadmin (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
phpmyadmin package does not w
80 matches
Mail list logo
