Test plan linux hwe 6.8:
jool_common.ko:
Running module version sanity check.
- Original module
- No original module exists within this kernel
- Installation
- Installing to /lib/modules/6.8.0-35-lowlatency/updates/dkms/
jool.ko:
Running module version sanity check.
- Original module
** Patch added: "jammy-jool-dkms.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/jool/+bug/2072313/+attachment/5794871/+files/jammy-jool-dkms.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bug
Public bug reported:
[Impact]
/var/lib/dkms/jool-dkms/4.1.7/build/src/mod/common/nl/nl_common.c: In function
‘get_jool_hdr’:
/var/lib/dkms/jool-dkms/4.1.7/build/src/mod/common/nl/nl_common.c:17:20: error:
‘struct genl_info’ has no member named ‘userhdr’
17 | return info->userhdr;
** Patch added: "jammy-iptables-netflow.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/iptables-netflow/+bug/2071491/+attachment/5794865/+files/jammy-iptables-netflow.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
http
Test on 6.8 hwe kernel:
ipt_NETFLOW.ko:
Running module version sanity check.
- Original module
- No original module exists within this kernel
- Installation
- Installing to /lib/modules/6.8.0-35-lowlatency/updates/dkms/
Test on 5.15 GA kernel:
ipt_NETFLOW.ko:
Running module version sani
** Also affects: ipu6-drivers (Ubuntu Jammy)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2071334
Title:
intel-ipu6-dkms FTBS with the latest linux 6.8 h
** Also affects: ivsc-driver (Ubuntu Jammy)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2071486
Title:
intel-vsc-dkms FTBS on jammy with the latest 6.8
Public bug reported:
[Impact]
/var/lib/dkms/ipt-netflow/2.6/build/ipt_NETFLOW.c:4090:17: error: implicit
declaration of function ‘strlcpy’; did you mean ‘strscpy’?
[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
4090 | strlcpy(info.driver, dev->dev.parent->driver->name,
sizeof(info.dr
Test build with the new HWE kernel 6.8:
ljca.ko:
Running module version sanity check.
- Original module
- No original module exists within this kernel
- Installation
- Installing to /lib/modules/6.8.0-35-lowlatency/updates/dkms/
spi-ljca.ko:
Running module version sanity check.
- Origina
** Patch added: "jammy-ivsc.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ivsc-driver/+bug/2071486/+attachment/5793229/+files/jammy-ivsc.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2
Public bug reported:
[Impact]
/var/lib/dkms/ivsc-driver/0~git202211241536.70d95269-0ubuntu0.22.04.1/build/drivers/mfd/ljca.c:219:17:
error: implicit declaration of function ‘strlcpy’; did you mean ‘strscpy’?
[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
219 | strlcpy(ids[0].id, hids
** Patch added: "jammy-ipu6.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ipu6-drivers/+bug/2071334/+attachment/5793195/+files/jammy-ipu6.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/
Backporting the version from oracular allows to fix both the hwe 6.8
kernel and the GA 5.15 kernel.
Test build with 6.8:
intel-ipu6.ko:
Running module version sanity check.
- Original module
- No original module exists within this kernel
- Installation
- Installing to /lib/modules/6.8.0-3
Public bug reported:
[Impact]
/var/lib/dkms/ipu6-drivers/0~git202211220708.278b7e3d-0ubuntu0.22.04.1/build/drivers/media/i2c/hm11b1.c:907:18:
error: implicit declaration of function ‘v4l2_subdev_get_try_format’; did you
mean ‘v4l2_subdev_get_fmt’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
907 |
** Patch added: "jammy-evdi-dkms.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evdi/+bug/2070022/+attachment/5792752/+files/jammy-evdi-dkms.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bug
Test build with GA kernel:
evdi.ko:
Running module version sanity check.
- Original module
- No original module exists within this kernel
- Installation
- Installing to /lib/modules/5.15.0-115-generic/updates/dkms/
Test build with new hwe kernel:
evdi.ko:
Running module version sanity ch
Public bug reported:
[Impact]
/var/lib/dkms/evdi/1.12.0+dfsg/build/evdi_fb.c: In function ‘evdifb_create’:
/var/lib/dkms/evdi/1.12.0+dfsg/build/evdi_fb.c:421:23: error: ‘FBINFO_DEFAULT’
undeclared (first use in this function)
421 | info->flags = FBINFO_DEFAULT;
|
Test build with the new 6.8 hwe kernel:
dm-writeboost.ko:
Running module version sanity check.
- Original module
- No original module exists within this kernel
- Installation
- Installing to /lib/modules/6.8.0-35-lowlatency/updates/dkms/
Test build with the GA kernel 5.15:
dm-writeboost
** Patch added: "jammy-dm-writeboost.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dm-writeboost/+bug/2069997/+attachment/5791082/+files/jammy-dm-writeboost.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.
Public bug reported:
[Impact]
/var/lib/dkms/dm-writeboost/2.2.13/build/dm-writeboost-target.c:56:19: error:
too few arguments to function ‘dm_io’
56 | io->err = dm_io(io->io_req, io->num_regions, io->regions,
&io->err_bits);
| ^
In file included from
/var
Test build with the new 6.8 HWE kernel:
ddcci.ko:
Running module version sanity check.
- Original module
- No original module exists within this kernel
- Installation
- Installing to /lib/modules/6.8.0-35-lowlatency/updates/dkms/
ddcci-backlight.ko:
Running module version sanity check.
-
** Patch added: "jammy-ddcci-dkms.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ddcci-driver-linux/+bug/2069710/+attachment/5791058/+files/jammy-ddcci-dkms.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.l
Public bug reported:
[Impact]
/var/lib/dkms/ddcci/0.4.1/build/ddcci/ddcci.c:1677:9: error: implicit
declaration of function ‘strlcpy’; did you mean ‘strscpy’?
[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
1677 | strlcpy(info->type, (outer_addr == DDCCI_DEFAULT_DEVICE_ADDR) ?
"ddcci" : "ddcc
Test build with the new 6.8 hwe kernel:
Building initial module for 6.8.0-35-lowlatency
...
EFI variables are not supported on this system
/sys/firmware/efi/efivars not found, aborting.
Done.
dahdi_dummy.ko:
Running module version sanity check.
- Original module
- No original module exists wi
** Patch added: "jammy-dahdi-dkms.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dahdi-linux/+bug/2069687/+attachment/5790455/+files/jammy-dahdi-dkms.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpa
Public bug reported:
[Impact]
/var/lib/dkms/dahdi/2.11.1~dfsg-1ubuntu12~22.04.3/build/drivers/dahdi/xpp/card_global.c:301:9:
error: implicit declaration of function ‘strlcpy’; did you mean ‘strscpy’?
[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
301 | strlcpy(buf, cmdline, MAX_PROC_WRITE);
Test build with GA kernel 5.15:
Building initial module for 5.15.0-115-generic
...
iwlwifi-compat.ko:
Running module version sanity check.
- Original module
- No original module exists within this kernel
- Installation
- Installing to /lib/modules/5.15.0-115-generic/updates/dkms/
iwlwifi.
** Patch added: "jammy-backport-iwlwifi.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/backport-iwlwifi-dkms/+bug/2069582/+attachment/5790444/+files/jammy-backport-iwlwifi.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Public bug reported:
[Impact]
In file included from
/var/lib/dkms/backport-iwlwifi/9858/build/net/wireless/core.c:25:
/var/lib/dkms/backport-iwlwifi/9858/build/backport-include/net/genetlink.h: In
function ‘__bp_genl_info_userhdr_set’:
/var/lib/dkms/backport-iwlwifi/9858/build/backport-include/
** Patch added: "jammy-backport-apfs.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-apfs-rw/+bug/2069573/+attachment/5790208/+files/jammy-backport-apfs.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.
Test plan with the new apfs dkms:
- build test with hwe kernel 6.8 (lowlatency):
apfs.ko:
Running module version sanity check.
- Original module
- No original module exists within this kernel
- Installation
- Installing to /lib/modules/6.8.0-35-lowlatency/updates/dkms/
- build test with
** Description changed:
[Impact]
/var/lib/dkms/linux-apfs-rw/0+git20220214+ds-2ubuntu2~22.04.3/build/apfs.h:978:14:
error: implicit declaration of function ‘__getblk_gfp’; did you mean
‘sb_getblk_gfp’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
- 978 | bh = __getblk_gfp(APFS_NXI(s
Public bug reported:
[Impact]
/var/lib/dkms/linux-apfs-rw/0+git20220214+ds-2ubuntu2~22.04.3/build/apfs.h:978:14:
error: implicit declaration of function ‘__getblk_gfp’; did you mean
‘sb_getblk_gfp’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
978 | bh = __getblk_gfp(APFS_NXI(sb)->nx_bdev,
I have an update on this. I've talked with the LXD team during the
engineering sprint in Madrid and at the moment we can't break ubuntu-fan
or we could potentially break some running LXD installations.
I asked the LXD team to start working as soon as possible to remove the
support for this feature
** Description changed:
+ [Impact]
+
+ It seems that kernel 6.8 introduced a regression in the 9pfs related to
+ caching and netfslib, that can cause some user-space apps to read
+ content from files that is not up-to-date (when they are used in a
+ producer/consumer fashion).
+
+ It seems that
I've uploaded a test kernel here:
https://people.canonical.com/~arighi/lp2056461/amd64/
With this one I can't reproduce the problem. It'd be great if someone
else could test it as well, to confirm that it's actually fixing the
problem.
Note: this kernel is a 6.8.0-32.32 with this commit reverted
I've done some bisecting and it looks like the culprit is this commit:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=80105ed2fd2715fb09a8fdb0655a8bdc86c120db
I'll prepare a test kernel with this one reverted, then if it's
confirmed, we can figure out a proper fix.
Test result with the patch set applied (ubuntu_fan_smoke_test):
11:48:05 INFO | Writing results to /home/ubuntu/autotest/client/results/default
11:48:05 INFO | START timestamp=1714564085localtime=May
01 11:48:05
11:48:05 INFO | START ubuntu_fan_smoke_test.setup
Patch set to re-enable Ubuntu FAN in the 6.8 Noble kernel:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/kernel-team/2024-May/150684.html
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064508
Title:
re-enable U
Public bug reported:
[Impact]
In LP: #2063298, we have opted to deprecate Ubuntu FAN support because
of the maintenance overhead and the possibility of regressions /
conflicts with the new networking eBPF APIs in kernels >= 6.8.
However, we cannot disable this feature in HWE/backport kernels, so
Thanks @dannf for updating the bug! The SRU description looks good to me
and everything seems reasonable, same with the plan.
I'll keep monitoring this tracker and we'll proceed once oracular will
be open.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is su
** Summary changed:
- apply sched-ext patch set to linux-unstable
+ provide a sched-ext enabled kernel for the 24.10 release
** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Oracular)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** No longer affects: linux (Ubuntu Noble)
--
You received this bug notification bec
Hello, any progress on this? Now that ubuntu-fan is officially
deprecated in Noble can we simply sync iproute2 with Debian? Is there
any pending activity / requirement that are preventing this? Thanks!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscri
Public bug reported:
[Impact]
In order to provide ubuntu-fan we need to maintain additional kernel
SAUCE patches that are currently conflicting with upstream code,
potentially breaking networking eBPF APIs.
To prevent such incompatibility the whole patch set requires a major
redesign.
However,
According to the information that I collected (asking around,
investigating, etc.), it seems that there are no critical users of
ubuntu-fan.
Moreover, considering the impact of the ubuntu-fan kernel patches (that
would require a major refactoring to avoid breaking the network eBPF
ABI), we decided
Test plan:
- without this change:
/usr/lib/linux-tools-6.8.0-22/bpftool /usr/lib/linux-tools-6.8.0-25/bpftool gen
skeleton /tmp/bpfcc-0.29.1+ds/libbpf-tools/.output/bashreadline.bpf.o >
/tmp/bpfcc-0.29.1+ds/libbpf-tools/.output/bashreadline.skel.h
Usage: bpftool [OPTIONS] OBJECT { COMMAND | he
debdiff in attach allows to run the autopkgtest correctly also with
multiple kernels installed.
** Patch added: "bpfcc-tools-fix-autopkgtest.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bpfcc/+bug/2061727/+attachment/5766017/+files/bpfcc-tools-fix-autopkgtest.debdiff
--
You received th
Public bug reported:
[Impact]
The autopkgtest for bpfcc-tools fails with the following error when
multiple linux-tools packages (multiple kernels) are installed:
942s /usr/lib/linux-tools-6.8.0-22/bpftool
/usr/lib/linux-tools-6.8.0-25/bpftool gen skeleton
/tmp/autopkgtest.2W4dxr/build.Uhs/src/
** Description changed:
[Impact]
Branch History Injection (BHI) attacks may allow a malicious application
to influence indirect branch prediction in kernel by poisoning the
branch history. eIBRS isolates indirect branch targets in ring0.
The BHB can still influence the choice of in
** Summary changed:
- Backport mitigations for the native BHI hardware vulnerabilty
+ Apply mitigations for the native BHI hardware vulnerabilty
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060909
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Noble)
Status: New => Fix Committed
** Description changed:
[Impact]
Branch History Injection (BHI) attacks may allow a malicious application
to influence indirect branch prediction in kernel by poisoning the
branch history. eIBRS isolates indirect b
Public bug reported:
[Impact]
Branch History Injection (BHI) attacks may allow a malicious application
to influence indirect branch prediction in kernel by poisoning the
branch history. eIBRS isolates indirect branch targets in ring0.
The BHB can still influence the choice of indirect branch pre
@tijs thanks for testing it! If 6.8.0-19 is working I assume that also
the latest kernel in release (6.8.0-22.22) is also working. If that's
the case I think we can close this for now.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
ht
Applied all the listed commits to noble/linux, including also:
9c55461040a9 ("x86/efistub: Remap kernel text read-only before dropping
NX attribute")
** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Noble)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Noble)
Status: New => Fix
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Noble)
Status: New => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059080
Title:
Add Real-time Linux Analysis tool (rtla) to linux-tools
To manag
Public bug reported:
[Impact]
CONFIG_INTEL_TDX_HOST depends on !KEXEC_CORE in the latest 6.8 kernel.
This was introduced by:
cb8eb06d50fc ("x86/virt/tdx: Disable TDX host support when kexec is
enabled")
We cannot regress kexec, therefore we need to disable
CONFIG_INTEL_TDX_HOST in the generic
If the issue is fixed without the extra patch, I think we can ignore it,
it was probably a false positive from UBSAN.
Let's keep an eye on it and if it shows up again in the future we can do
a test with my additional patch. Thanks for update!
--
You received this bug notification because you are
Changing the state to Won't fix, because of LP: #2059762.
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Noble)
Status: Fix Released => Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2046040
Title:
e
Looking at the code this issue seems to be introduced by `UBUNTU: SAUCE:
modpost: support arbitrary symbol length in modversion` and the UBSAN
warning tells us that accessing vers->name[0] could be an out-of-bounds
access.
The struct modversion_info contains a flexibile array (name), that is
corre
Public bug reported:
[Impact]
The **rtla** is a meta-tool that includes a set of commands that aims to
analyze the real-time properties of Linux.
Considering the latest "low-latency" capabilities acquired by the
generic kernel and also considering the recent trend in Ubuntu to focus
on performan
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2051560
Title:
Provide python perf module
To manage notifications about this bug go t
Patch sent to the kernel team mailing list for review:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/kernel-team/2024-March/149751.html
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2051560
Title:
Provide pytho
** Description changed:
+ [Impact]
+
+ We need to provide the python perf module, because some applications
+ (such as tuned) require it.
+
+ This module is implemented inside perf, provided by the kernel.
+
+ At the moment we provide a distinct perf for each kernel installed in
+ the system. T
Unfortunately those traces don't say much without the debugging symbols.
If it happens also with the mainline kernel we should see similar bugs
reported upstream, that's why I'm not very convinced about this being a
kernel issue. More likely a library issue, considering that it happens
with differe
Hm... honestly this looks more like a user-space / brave issue than a
kernel issue. Do you get similar SIGSEGV with other apps?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058191
Title:
Getting S
Can you give it a try also with the latest upstream 6.8 (available here
https://kernel.ubuntu.com/mainline/v6.8.1/). This should help to verify
if it's an upstream issue or a specific issue with the Ubuntu kernel.
Thanks!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
B
@tijs not exactly that kernel, but a kernel that has all the fixes that
are included in 6.8.1. :)
If you are willing to do one more test to confirm that everything is
fine in the next candidate kernel for 24.04, you could try with
6.8.0-20.20 from this ppa: https://launchpad.net/~canonical-kernel-
I don't have the hardware at the moment. It'd be great if you could do a
test with the latest mainline build, so that we can better understand if
it's an upstream issue or something specific with the Ubuntu kernel (or
maybe a kernel .config issue):
https://kernel.ubuntu.com/mainline/v6.8.1/
Thank
The message `mce: [Hardware Error]: Machine check events logged` really
seems to indicate a potential hardware malfunction.
Can you double check if this is happening only with the latest 6.8? Do
you see anything similar in dmesg with other kernels?
--
You received this bug notification because y
Can you elaborate more on the freeze part? Does the system completely
freezes and it never recovers or is it a temporary freeze (until the
copy completes)?
How much RAM do you have in your system?
Can you check if the following helps to mitigate the problem?
$ echo $((32 * 1024 * 1024)) | sudo
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Noble)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056616
Title:
left-over ceph debugging printks
To manage notifications
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Noble)
Status: New => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2051342
Title:
Enable lowlatency settings in the generic kernel
To manage notif
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Noble)
Status: New => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056126
Title:
hwmon: (coretemp) Fix core count limitation
To manage notificati
Public bug reported:
[Impact]
In linux 6.8 the coretemp driver supports at most 128 cores per package.
Cores higher than 128 will lose their core temperature information.
There is an upstream patch set that allows to support more than 128
cores per package, but it's applied to linux-next for now
** Changed in: linux-apfs-rw (Ubuntu Noble)
Status: New => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2054682
Title:
apfs-dkms FTBS in noble with the latest 6.8 kernel
To ma
I haven't been able to reproduce this on my PC yet... Looking at the
error, especially the virtio-fs part, I'm wondering if you're missing
virtiofsd in your host. Can you try to `apt install virtiofsd` (if you
don't have it installed already)?
--
You received this bug notification because you are
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Noble)
Status: New => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1951440
Title:
Enable CONFIG_INTEL_IOMMU_DEFAULT_ON and
CONFIG_INTEL_IOMMU_SCA
For the general use case I think that reducing the verbosity makes
sense. About our testing, I think we're not booting kernels with
"quiet", and if we do we should definitely drop it from the kernel boot
options.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
I don't see these messages with the latest Noble using the kernel from
the proposed pocket (6.8.0-11-generic). Can you also give it a try (if
you can)?
Hopefully we'll be able to promote a 6.8 in release soon, we are
currently blocked by a glibc regression (that doesn't seem to be a
kernel regress
Public bug reported:
SRU Justification
Impact:
The upstream process for stable tree updates is quite similar
in scope to the Ubuntu SRU process, e.g., each patch has to
demonstrably fix a bug, and each patch is vetted by upstream
by originating either directly from
Public bug reported:
SRU Justification
Impact:
The upstream process for stable tree updates is quite similar
in scope to the Ubuntu SRU process, e.g., each patch has to
demonstrably fix a bug, and each patch is vetted by upstream
by originating either directly
** Summary changed:
- casper: qemu image too small in autopkgtest
+ casper: qemu instances too small during autopkgtest (potential OOM failures)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1976287
Fix for focal (where we are experiencing regressions with hwe-5.15) in
the attached debdiff.
** Patch added: "casper-increase-memory-to-test-instances.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/casper/+bug/1976287/+attachment/5593861/+files/casper-increase-memory-to-test-instances.debd
Public bug reported:
[Impact]
During autopkgtest we are creating VMs with 768MB of RAM, that used to
be enough in the past, but nowdays we typically require more memory and
we may trigger some sporadic out-of-memory failures during autopkgtest.
[Test case]
Run autopkgtest with a recent kernel (
This seems to fix the test failure.
** Patch added: "systemd-test-make-test-execute-pass-on-Linux-5.15.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1975587/+attachment/5592621/+files/systemd-test-make-test-execute-pass-on-Linux-5.15.debdiff
** Patch removed: "systemd-test-m
** Patch added: "systemd-test-make-test-execute-pass-on-Linux-5.15.patch"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1975587/+attachment/5592620/+files/systemd-test-make-test-execute-pass-on-Linux-5.15.patch
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Public bug reported:
[Impact]
test-execute autotest is failing in focal with kernel 5.15. This is
because the following kernel commit changed the ABI for ioprio:
e70344c05995 ("block: fix default IO priority handling")
Previously setting IOPRIO_CLASS_NONE for a process would report
IOPRIO_CLASS
@vorlon JFYI, I've just created LP: #1975499 for kinetic.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1969752
Title:
oss4-dkms '-mfloat-abi=hard' build failure
To manage notifications about this
Public bug reported:
[Impact]
oss4-dkms fails to build in Jammy with the following error:
gcc: error: unrecognized command-line option ‘-mfloat-abi=hard’
We have considered to drop support of this package in other
architectures (except amd64) - see for example LP: #1969752, but
starting from ki
Public bug reported:
[Impact]
Use nosuid,noexec mount options on devtmpfs, this allows to provide a
bit of extra security by preventing mmapping stuff in /dev with
PROT_EXEC or having setuid executables.
[Test case]
If we really want to provide a test case for this...:
$ grep devtmpfs /proc/m
Public bug reported:
[Impact]
The patch that we have recently re-introduced to properly support
overlayfs on top of shiftfs can introduce potential kernel panics, for
example:
BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0008
[ 447.039738] #PF: supervisor read access in ke
Alex, thanks for the review! We can definitely remove the dependency of
AUFS and provide a standalone patch, in this way we can provide this
feature also to those kernels that don't have AUFS enabled (like all the
recent kernels in jammy). I'll work on that and will ping you when I
have a patch rea
Everything looks good, so I re-applied the patch with the addition of
this extra fix:
https://git.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-
kernel/ubuntu/+source/linux/+git/focal/commit/?h=hwe-5.15-next&id=b4c25dba7993400e9c57d3e60bec4ab8bce1b701
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ub
I think I have a proper fix to re-introduce this patch without panicing
the kernel. I'm currently running some stress tests to make sure nothing
is broken. If everything goes well I'll re-introduce this patch with the
proper fix.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of U
@mihalicyn Yes, this patch without AUFS enabled doesn't introduce any
problem, but that's because without AUFS the patch is basically a no-op.
Here's the ported patch that was applied to 5.15:
https://git.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-kernel/ubuntu/+source/linux/+git/focal/commit/?h=hwe-5.15-next&id=e3e60
This patch seems to introduce this NULL pointer dereference, that can be
triggered systematically running lxc autopkgtest:
BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0008
[ 447.039738] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
[ 447.040369] #PF: error_code(0x) - not-present
NOTE to clarify: I'm going to revert this patch in focal/hwe-5.15, that
is the only 5.15 kernel with this patch that has AUFS enabled (so the
only kernel where this bug can be triggered).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
** Summary changed:
- disable Intel DMA remapping options by default
+ disable Intel DMA remapping by default
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1971699
Title:
disable Intel DMA remappin
Public bug reported:
[Impact]
It seems that enabling Intel IOMMU can cause some weird gfx problems, see for
example:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1971146
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1965882
[Test case]
We don't have any specific test case, only other bug reports that
tracked down
** Description changed:
The wpa-dhclient autopkgtest is always failing without wireless-tools
- installed. Maybe wireless-tools should be an explicit dependency of
- network-manager.
+ installed. Maybe wireless-tools should be added to the test dependencies
+ (debian/tests/control).
--
You rec
1 - 100 of 712 matches
Mail list logo
