[Bug 1031395] Re: tomcat6 and tomcat7 are not installable side-by-side

2014-01-14 Thread A1an
This is still affecting Debian 7.2 as of today, is any workaround available meantime? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1031395 Title: tomcat6 and tomcat7 are not installable side-by-sid

[Bug 1209423] Re: [STAGING] 2.6.32-47 kernel update on 10.04 breaks software RAID at boot

2013-10-02 Thread A1an
Just curious, why is that still incomplete? Any info still missing? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1209423 Title: [STAGING] 2.6.32-47 kernel update on 10.04 breaks software RAID at

[Bug 1209423] Re: [STAGING] 2.6.32-47 kernel update on 10.04 breaks software RAID at boot

2013-08-27 Thread A1an
@Stefan: --scan command might be useless but thanks anyway since it helped me noticing the issue that make me solve it :) Here is the output of the scan command and the relevant content of the config file: $ sudo mdadm --misc --scan --detail ARRAY /dev/md0 level=raid1 num-devices=2 metadata=01.02

[Bug 1209423] Re: [STAGING] 2.6.32-47 kernel update on 10.04 breaks software RAID at boot

2013-08-26 Thread A1an
Attached the --examine for the other component of the array (sdc1), it shows similar output. ** Attachment added: "Output of mdadm --examine on the other component of md0" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1209423/+attachment/3789526/+files/mdadm-examine-broken2.txt -- You

[Bug 1209423] Re: [STAGING] 2.6.32-47 kernel update on 10.04 breaks software RAID at boot

2013-08-07 Thread A1an
Just rebooted into -46 and noticed that the output of mdadm --examine /dev/sda6 seems exactly the same and shows the same long series of "failed" (so it might be normal for 1.2 metadata?). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu

[Bug 1209423] Re: [STAGING] 2.6.32-47 kernel update on 10.04 breaks software RAID at boot

2013-08-07 Thread A1an
Answering questions from the above linked bug: > It's possible that the patches which were linked are not related. They're not in the delta between the two versions which are isted. I see, I did not realize the kernel versions (using a dot for the last digits) are different from the ubuntu ones (

[Bug 1190295] Re: 2.6.32-47 kernel update on 10.04 breaks software RAID (+ LVM)

2013-08-07 Thread A1an
@penalvch New bug filed as requested: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1209423 PS: I did not realize the kernel versions (using a dot for the last digits) are different from the ubuntu ones (using a -). I'll also answer latest questions by sconklin on the new bugreport. -- Yo

[Bug 1209423] [NEW] [STAGING] 2.6.32-47 kernel update on 10.04 breaks software RAID at boot

2013-08-07 Thread A1an
Public bug reported: After update from 2.6.32-46 to 2.6.32-47 one of the md arrays does not start anymore at boot time. The RAID 1 md0 now causes message "Continue to wait; or Press S to skip mounting or M for manual recovery" at boot. I used "S" to create this report as requested in a similar bug

[Bug 1190295] Re: 2.6.32-47 kernel update on 10.04 breaks software RAID (+ LVM)

2013-08-01 Thread A1an
I see and I'll try to flie the new report as soon as possible, even though I think it is the same cause as this one. I've had a look at the kernel log and see that only two patches affected the md component between 2.6.32-46 (working kernel) and 2.6.32-47 (broken kernel, reported in this bug): ht

[Bug 1190295] Re: 2.6.32-47 kernel update on 10.04 breaks software RAID (+ LVM)

2013-07-10 Thread A1an
Just updated to 2.6.32-49, issue still present an had to switch back to 2.6.32-46 which still works fine. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1190295 Title: 2.6.32-47 kernel update on 10.0

[Bug 1190295] Re: 2.6.32-47 kernel update on 10.04 breaks software RAID (+ LVM)

2013-06-18 Thread A1an
The array that does not start anymore has the following config: level=raid1 metadata=1.2 num-devices=2 While a second array with metadata=1.0 seems to be recognized and started correctly. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubunt

[Bug 880646] Re: 11.04 and up cannot start from RAID/LVM2

2013-06-15 Thread A1an
Just got a regression on RAID boot: 2.6.32-46 works 2.6.32-47 breaks RAID 1 drive See #1190295 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/880646 Title: 11.04 and up cannot start from RAID/LVM2

[Bug 1190295] Re: latest 10.04 kernel update breaks software RAID + LVM

2013-06-15 Thread A1an
On my system: $ uname -svrmo Linux 2.6.32-46-generic #108-Ubuntu SMP Thu Apr 11 15:56:25 UTC 2013 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ lsb_release -a Distributor ID: Ubuntu Description:Ubuntu 10.04.4 LTS Release:10.04 Codename: lucid The RAID 1 partitions broke since kernel 2.6.32-47 ("Continue

[Bug 1157919] [NEW] mount.cifs does not set non-numeric uid

2013-03-20 Thread A1an
Public bug reported: Using fstab to mount remote windows share with following options //storage.server/Share/subdir /mnt/local cifs noauto,users,user,uid=SEE_BELOW,username=Win_user,workgroup=Win_group 0 0 Using uid=username gives me user=root, group=username Using uid=1002 works as expected gi

[Bug 560839] Re: error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400)

2013-03-11 Thread A1an
Same issue on Ubuntu 10.04.4 LTS 4x2GB 1333MHz RAM Intel board DP55WB too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x8f000). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/560839 Title: error: too small lower

[Bug 1100936] [NEW] init script cannot find java7 from oracle

2013-01-17 Thread A1an
Public bug reported: When starting up on a system with only java7 from Oracle installed the init script cannot find any jvm to run. This can be solved by adding the path "/usr/lib/jvm/java-7-oracle" to the list of possible java vm locations inside the init script. Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS Tomcat 6.0.3

[Bug 1031395] Re: tomcat6 and tomcat7 are not installable side-by-side

2013-01-17 Thread A1an
Even worse, once you go for Tomcat7 there is no way back to Tomcat6 with apt, reported error is: The following packages have unmet dependencies: tomcat6 : Depends: tomcat6-common (>= 6.0.35-1ubuntu3.2) but it is not going to be installed E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packag

[Bug 1031395] Re: tomcat6 and tomcat7 are not installable side-by-side

2013-01-17 Thread A1an
@Igor can't your repackaged versions be simply put back to the main repo to become available and configuration merged to solve this issue? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1031395 Title:

[Bug 806619] Re: Driver net8192su (Realtek USB) fails to load

2013-01-15 Thread A1an
Similar issue with same driver but different vendor Hardware: ISY USB wireless adapter - IWL 3000 Description:Ubuntu 10.04.4 LTS Release:10.04 Codename: lucid uname -a Linux pca3 2.6.32-45-generic #102-Ubuntu SMP Wed Jan 2 22:38:04 UTC 2013 x86_64 GNU/Linux Jan 15 14:43:38 pc

[Bug 990830] Re: xfce4 cpugraph colors are nearly equal to panel color

2012-10-01 Thread A1an
Good for the colors but does the patch fixes also the right button context menu? Is there a quick workaround that can be used to forcibly remove the plugin from the panel? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.la

[Bug 901150] Re: libproj-dev dependency broken natty

2011-12-14 Thread A1an
Removing and reinstalling the packages solved the issue, it was probably some leftover inconsistency -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/901150 Title: libproj-dev dependency broken natty

[Bug 901150] Re: libproj-dev dependency broken natty

2011-12-09 Thread A1an
I tried on a fresh install of natty and it worked fine. The issue is present on a system that comes from several distribution upgrades, maybe the issue is due to packages left from previous versions. I'll try to remove and reinstall the relevant packages to see if this solves the problem. -- You

[Bug 901150] [NEW] libproj-dev dependency broken natty

2011-12-07 Thread A1an
Public bug reported: $ sudo apt-get install proj libproj-dev Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distrib

[Bug 700304] Re: Shift+Del to permanently remove file hangs

2011-01-09 Thread A1an
Confirmed, I do have rabbitvcs-nautilus installed and its latest update (0.14.1.1-1~lucid) solved the issue. Thank you. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/700304 Title: Shift+Del to perm

[Bug 700304] Re: Shift+Del to permanently remove file hangs

2011-01-08 Thread A1an
** Attachment added: "Confirmation dialog hung and force quit message" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/700304/+attachment/1787990/+files/sc-hung.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/70

[Bug 700304] [NEW] Shift+Del to permanently remove file hangs

2011-01-08 Thread A1an
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: nautilus Using shift+del keyboard shortcut to permanently remove a file brings up the confirmation dialog, then either selecting cancel or delete causes nautilus to hang (although the chosen operation seems to complete). To restore nautilus the close ico

[Bug 429784] Re: problem while loading OAFIID Glipper

2010-11-09 Thread A1an
I think it is: added Glipper to the panel yesterday; today (first reboot since then) I'm getting the same error: The panel encountered a problem while loading "OAFIID:Glipper". Distributor ID: Ubuntu Description:Ubuntu 10.04.1 LTS Release:10.04 Codename: lucid updated yesterday

[Bug 433438] Re: device descriptor read/64, error -110

2010-09-30 Thread A1an
Errata: the "acpi=force irqpoll" boot option is not a reliable solution as for today the problem is occurring again with errors: ehci [ 325.940242] usb 2-2: device descriptor read/64, error -110 [ 336.615721] usb 2-2: device descriptor read/8, error -71 uhci [ 418.901738] usb 5-2: device desc

[Bug 433438] Re: device descriptor read/64, error -110

2010-09-29 Thread A1an
The workaround linked by manatlan is working but forces usb1 speed. It seems that also adding the "acpi=force irqpoll" boot option (as described here: http://www.ubuntugeek.com/how-to-fix-usb-stops-working- problem-in-ubuntu.html ) improves things a bit: it just revived my usb2 connectivity and se

[Bug 433438] Re: device descriptor read/64, error -110

2010-07-27 Thread A1an
Hello, do not know if this helps but I have a 4 GB usb pen drive that is (apparently) randomly not recognized when connected to an high speed port while it works fine when connected to an usb hub working at low speed (tryed also with another pen drive of same brand and one of different brand with s

[Bug 244377] Re: DMESG - kernel BUG at /build/buildd/linux-2.6.24/fs/sysfs/file.c:126!

2010-04-27 Thread A1an
The bugs still seems to be there, it is crashing the LSI RAID monitoring utility MegaCLI, I don't know if there are other functions affected. Distributor ID: Ubuntu Description:Ubuntu 8.04.4 LTS Release:8.04 Codename: hardy Linux hostname 2.6.24-27-server #1 SMP Fri Mar 12 01:23

[Bug 229343] Re: saned cannot access the scanner in Hardy

2009-07-12 Thread A1an
Creating the policy file didn't work for me, however Vanessa's solution posted on 2008-09-05 (running saned as root) did solve the problem. I'm also using xinetd to start saned. Regards --- Distributor ID: Ubuntu Description:Ubuntu 8.04.3 LTS Release:8.04 Codename: hardy -- s