On 11/06/14 00:04, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 04:51:20PM +0100, Adam Gold wrote:
>> Hi there. I've been writing a script that is now finished and working
>> (thanks, in part, to some helpful input from this board). What I'd
>> really like to do now is go through it with an '
Ok, so after making the changes the code does bind the startingPort
variable but that is the only port that gets bound. Also when connecting to
the startingPort I receive the following error:
Please enter starting port: 65520
listening...
...connected!
Traceback (most recent cal
Ok, so when I run the code it immediately terminates and never 'listens' to
the ports in the loop. I have verified by running netstat -an | grep 65530
and the startingPort is not binding.
***Server***
Jons-Mac:Desktop Jon$ python response.py
Please enter starting port: 65530
Jons-Mac:Desktop Jo
On 11/06/14 00:30, Adam Gold wrote:
Thanks for the reply Steven. It's no more than 100 lines at a guess
In that case just copy and paste it into a message and send it to the
group. Anyone with time available can then take a peek.
hth
--
Alan G
Author of the Learn to Program web site
http:
On 11/06/14 00:08, Jon Engle wrote:
Ok, so when I run the code it immediately terminates and never 'listens'
This has nothing to do with your immediate problem but...
***Code***
#!/usr/bin/python # This is server.py file
from socket import * #import the socket library
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 4:08 PM, Jon Engle wrote:
> Ok, so when I run the code it immediately terminates and never 'listens' to
> the ports in the loop. I have verified by running netstat -an | grep 65530
> and the startingPort is not binding.
The problem is that all threads started by a program
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/06/14 08:11, Alan Gauld wrote:
> On 11/06/14 00:30, Adam Gold wrote:
>
>> Thanks for the reply Steven. It's no more than 100 lines at a
>> guess
>
> In that case just copy and paste it into a message and send it to
> the group. Anyone with tim
Jon Engle wrote:
> Ok, so when I run the code it immediately terminates and never 'listens'
> to the ports in the loop. I have verified by running netstat -an | grep
> 65530 and the startingPort is not binding.
As I've already hinted the easiest way to keep your listening threads alive
is to use
Alan Gauld wrote:
> On 10/06/14 09:43, Peter Otten wrote:
>> I'm posting via gmane. Since last month there is a delay (usually a few
>> hours I think) until my posts appear and I seem to be getting a
>>
>> "Your message to Tutor awaits moderator approval, would you like to
>> cancel..."
>
> Somet
Alan Gauld wrote:
> On 11/06/14 00:08, Jon Engle wrote:
>> Ok, so when I run the code it immediately terminates and never 'listens'
>
> This has nothing to do with your immediate problem but...
>
>> ***Code***
>>
>>#!/usr/bin/python # This is server.py file
>> from socket impo
On 11/06/14 09:49, Peter Otten wrote:
Something has changed on the list server which means that any time
someone edits their settings it automatically sets up full moderation.
Normal service should have resumed.
It has! Thank you.
Good, now if only I could find a way to stop the server switc
Thank you for your help, this definitely gets me going in the right
direction!
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 4:16 AM, Marc Tompkins
wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 4:08 PM, Jon Engle wrote:
> > Ok, so when I run the code it immediately terminates and never 'listens'
> to
> > the ports in the loop.
>>> Thanks for the reply Steven. It's no more than 100 lines at a
>>> guess
>
>> In that case just copy and paste it into a message and send it to
>> the group. Anyone with time available can then take a peek.
>
> One way noobs anywhere can learn is by listening in to other people's
> conversati
Ok, not so bad, hoewer there are some parts of the code that could be
done a bit cleaner.
I'll write them below in the response.
Thanks for the reply Steven. It's no more than 100 lines at a
guess
In that case just copy and paste it into a message and send it to
the group. Anyone with time av
Hi. Everywhere I have read, the 'standard practice' for indentation is 4
spaces, but I am running into 2 space indentation in a lot of tutorials and
such. Should I keep with the 4 spaces, or does it even matter, as long as it
is consistent?
I just recently became aware of the inaccuracy of ca
On 11/06/14 21:46, Deb Wyatt wrote:
Hi. Everywhere I have read, the 'standard practice' for indentation is 4
spaces,
That's a style recommendation. Python doesn't care.
But your readers will. 2 spaces is the absolute minimum,
8 spaces is about the absolute maximum. Outside that it
gets hard t
On 11/06/14 11:43, Adam Gold wrote:
# create snapshot names like the following: 2014-06-10T01-00-01.vm1.img.bz2
for i in vgxenList:
DATE = datetime.datetime.now().strftime("%Y-%m-%d" + "T" + "%H-%M-%S")
Why use addition? You could just insett the literal T...
DATE = datetime.datetime.now
Deb Wyatt Wrote in message:
> Hi. Everywhere I have read, the 'standard practice' for indentation is 4
> spaces, but I am running into 2 space indentation in a lot of tutorials and
> such. Should I keep with the 4 spaces, or does it even matter, as long as it
> is consistent?
>
4 spaces is
Hi Deb,
My responses below, interleaved with your questions.
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 12:46:11PM -0800, Deb Wyatt wrote:
> Hi. Everywhere I have read, the 'standard practice' for indentation
> is 4 spaces, but I am running into 2 space indentation in a lot of
> tutorials and such. Should I k
On 2014-06-11 20:08, Dave Angel wrote:
I learned programming in 1967 with Fortran, and McCracken spent a
chapter warning about that same thing. Probably everything he
warned about still applies to Python and modern computers.
A google search for "McCracken" did not yield anyone that seems
Hi, responses below...
Dne 11. 6. 2014 22:46, Deb Wyatt napsal(a):
Hi. Everywhere I have read, the 'standard practice' for indentation is 4
spaces, but I am running into 2 space indentation in a lot of tutorials and
such. Should I keep with the 4 spaces, or does it even matter, as long as it
21 matches
Mail list logo
