I would first like to state two things, those being that I am a horrible
writer as well as explaining things, but Ill try my absolute best.
Everything python is an object. Strings, integers, lists, so on and so
forth. In regards to classes and their relativity towards objects, I am at
complete s
Spir and Peter, thanks for the specifics, super helpful. Alan, super thanks
for the general advice, you guys are awesome!!
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 5:34 AM, wrote:
> Send Tutor mailing list submissions to
> tutor@python.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
I think I may have found a bug:
pairs = [(1, 'one'), (2, 'two'), (3, 'three'), (4, 'four')]
pairs.sort(key=lambda pair: pair[1])
pairs
[(4, 'four'), (1, 'one'), (3, 'three'), (2, 'two')]
Should be:
pairs = [(1, 'one'), (2, 'two'), (3, 'three'), (4, 'four')]
pairs.sort(key
On 20/01/14 00:55, Christian Alexander wrote:
I would first like to state two things, those being that I am a horrible
writer as well as explaining things, but Ill try my absolute best.
Everything python is an object. Strings, integers, lists, so on and
so forth. In regards to classes and the
On 20/01/14 07:37, rahmad akbar wrote:
Spir and Peter, thanks for the specifics, super helpful. Alan, super
thanks for the general advice, you guys are awesome!!
You are welcome, but please don't post an entire digest just to say
thanks. It uses up bandwidth and storage unnecessarily and some
On 20/01/2014 01:16, Doug and Riekie Dorman wrote:
I think I may have found a bug:
pairs = [(1, 'one'), (2, 'two'), (3, 'three'), (4, 'four')]
pairs.sort(key=lambda pair: pair[1])
pairs
[(4, 'four'), (1, 'one'), (3, 'three'), (2, 'two')]
Should be:
pairs = [(1, 'one'), (2, '
On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 02:18:54PM -0500, Keith Winston wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 11:55 AM, Alan Gauld
> wrote:
> > It has reached the point that I'm back to looking for a new teaching
> > language. In Python 3 the decision has clearly been made to focus on
> > supporting Python's role as
Hi,
When is setting a PYTHONDONTWRITEBYTECODE environment variable useful? Or set
sys.dont_write_bytecode to True? Or start Python with the -B option?
I know what it does
(http://docs.python.org/2/using/cmdline.html#envvar-PYTHONDONTWRITEBYTECODE),
i.e. no pyc or pyo fiules are written, but WH
On 20/01/14 01:16, Doug and Riekie Dorman wrote:
I think I may have found a bug:
pairs = [(1, 'one'), (2, 'two'), (3, 'three'), (4, 'four')]
pairs.sort(key=lambda pair: pair[1])
pairs
[(4, 'four'), (1, 'one'), (3, 'three'), (2, 'two')]
Should be:
pairs = [(1, 'one'), (2, 'tw
On 20 January 2014 20:33, Alan Gauld wrote:
> On 20/01/14 00:55, Christian Alexander wrote:
>>
>> I would first like to state two things, those being that I am a horrible
>> writer as well as explaining things, but Ill try my absolute best.
>> Everything python is an object. Strings, integers,
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 02:42:57AM -0800, Albert-Jan Roskam wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> When is setting a PYTHONDONTWRITEBYTECODE environment variable useful? Or set
> sys.dont_write_bytecode to True? Or start Python with the -B option?
> I know what it does
> (http://docs.python.org/2/using/cmdline.htm
On 01/20/2014 01:19 AM, Keith Winston wrote:
On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 3:50 PM, Alan Gauld wrote:
How would Python know whether you want find for gettext, mmap, str,
xml.etree.ElementTree.Element or xml.etree.ElementTree.ElementTree?
Absolutely, but a newbie doesn't even guess that more than o
Not very elegant, but it'll work. I don't suppose there is a
>> function for determining the number of digits after the decimal, is it?
>
> It looks like you are trying to avoid rounding errors in decimal arithmetic.
> You might be interested in Python's decimal.Decimal type then.
That's right,
On 01/19/2014 10:59 PM, Christian Alexander wrote:
Hello Tutorians,
Looked all over the net for class tutorials
Unable to understand the "self" argument
Attempting to visual classes
I have searched high and low, for easy to follow tutorials regarding
classes. Although I grok the general concep
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 5:42 AM, Albert-Jan Roskam wrote:
>
> When is setting a PYTHONDONTWRITEBYTECODE environment variable useful? Or
> set sys.dont_write_bytecode to True? Or start Python with the -B option?
> I know what it does
> (http://docs.python.org/2/using/cmdline.html#envvar-PYTHONDONTW
this is the coding that i am trying to run it on python 3.3. the original
coding was made on python 2.7 however i have made some changes to the coding to
make it work on python 3.3. the changes that i have made on brackets and
raw_input to input. the coding does not load the external file ans s
On 1/20/2014 12:51 PM, S Tareq wrote:
external file ans says invalid syntax .
The full traceback with the invalid syntax message will provide you the
specific line where the issue is realized. Note that the actual error
my occur elsewhere particularly with mismatched parenthetical
expressi
S Tareq wrote:
> this is the coding that i am trying to run it on python 3.3. the original
> coding was made on python 2.7 however i have made some changes to the
> coding to make it work on python 3.3. the changes that i have made on
> brackets and raw_input to input. the coding does not load th
Tareq,
It'd be nice if you formatted it through upload with gist (
https://gist.github.com/ ) and posted the syntax error you were receiving
as well. Then you wouldn't have to put ?s instead of indents, and we'd be
able to read it better. I believe this is actually recommended in the
mailing list
> But you should not translate your scripts by hand -- there's a tool called
> 2to3 that does the legwork for you.
S Tareq has asked this question just a few days ago.
https://mail.python.org/pipermail/tutor/2014-January/099466.html
Most of us here have not yet gone entirely senile yet, so
On 1/20/2014 4:05 PM, Danny Yoo wrote:
S Tareq has asked this question just a few days ago.
https://mail.python.org/pipermail/tutor/2014-January/099466.html
Most of us here have not yet gone entirely senile yet, so we still remember.
Speak for yourself! The rest of us are rapidly approac
>> In that thread, we asked the original questioner why they were having
>> difficulty. But S Tareq responded in the way I would expect out of an
>> automated answering machine: that is, not at all. This is not
>> encouraging: either he or she did not understand the question, or they
>> ignored t
On 21/01/2014 00:05, Danny Yoo wrote:
But you should not translate your scripts by hand -- there's a tool called
2to3 that does the legwork for you.
S Tareq has asked this question just a few days ago.
https://mail.python.org/pipermail/tutor/2014-January/099466.html
Most of us here have
23 matches
Mail list logo
