Hello again.
So, any xml.etree experts out there who might have missed this over the weekend?
Thanks in advance!
Chris
___
Tutor maillist - Tutor@python.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tutor
On 19/09/2011 10:46, lists wrote:
Hello again.
So, any xml.etree experts out there who might have missed this over the weekend?
Not me, I'm afraid, but might I suggest that you ask on the mail
Python list:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
There's nothing wrong with askin
On 19/09/2011 11:01, Tim Golden wrote:
you're more likely to find people familiar with the package (including
its maintainer in fact...)
Sorry, I misread your post and thought you were referring lxml.etree
(which is a 3rd-party lib). My basic point still stands, though:
you'll get more library-
Thanks Tim,
Will do.
Chris
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 11:05 AM, Tim Golden wrote:
> On 19/09/2011 11:01, Tim Golden wrote:
>>
>> you're more likely to find people familiar with the package (including
>> its maintainer in fact...)
>
> Sorry, I misread your post and thought you were referring lxml.e
My obvious thinking is : Java being compiled language , must be faster then
a interpreted language.
I know couple of points : Development time is less + easy to learn + python
is expressive.
Can you share some more especially as compared to Java / .net (two primarily
used languages in enterpris
On 2011/09/19 03:27 PM, Ashish Gaonker wrote:
My obvious thinking is : Java being compiled language , must be faster
then a interpreted language.
I know couple of points : Development time is less + easy to learn +
python is expressive.
Can you share some more especially as compared to Jav
Hi Ashish,
On 19 September 2011 14:27, Ashish Gaonker wrote:
> My obvious thinking is : Java being compiled language , must be faster then
> a interpreted language.
>
> I know couple of points : Development time is less + easy to learn + python
> is expressive.
>
> Can you share some more espe
Pythonistas,
This is the resolution of a question I asked over the weekend.
The method I was thinking of was in a program I wrote on my work
computer but couldn't remember.
Now I'm at work and I see. It is not including the tuple at the end of
the string nor using a dictionary. There is another
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Pirritano, Matthew
wrote:
>
You some variables say:
>
> X = "sky"
> Y = "blue"
>
> Print "the %(x)s is %(y)s" % locals()
>
> the sky is blue
>
> That works! And in cases where I'm replacing over 20 strings it's much
> easier than having to include a tuple at the
Is there any additional overhead of using the locals() or format(locals())
instead of a tuple? - the format option is a double function call so I would
expect that to be considerably slower
Thanks,
Bodsda
-- my phone won't let me bottom post, sorry
Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 1:11 PM, wrote:
> Is there any additional overhead of using the locals() or format(locals())
> instead of a tuple? - the format option is a double function call so I would
> expect that to be considerably slower
>
Using the following code and timeit, it appears that there
Hello,
I am trying to use OptionParser (my first time) to set a variable (cvs_output). i.e. if --csv is given in the list of
options, then cvs_output = True.
Then I check,
if cvs_output == True:
[...]
I have the following so far but something is missing.
from optparse import OptionParser
usa
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Mina Nozar wrote:
> **
> I don't really understand what dest and action in the arguments to
> parser.add_option mean.
> Any help is appreciated.
>
Have you read the fine manual, specifically the sections here:
http://docs.python.org/library/optparse.html#optparse
On 17/09/11 13:08, lists wrote:
I have been trying to learn how to parse XML with Python and learn how
to use xml.etree. Lots of the tutorials seem to be very long winded.
I'm trying to access a UK postcode API at www.uk-postcodes.com to take
a UK postcode and return the lat/lng of the postcode.
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 9:20 PM, Sander Sweers wrote:
> On 17/09/11 13:08, lists wrote:
>>
>> I have been trying to learn how to parse XML with Python and learn how
>> to use xml.etree. Lots of the tutorials seem to be very long winded.
>>
>> I'm trying to access a UK postcode API at www.uk-postco
Dear tutor dudes,
I know that a for loop uses a an iterators next method in this way
for variable in iterator:
execute_code(variable)
is equivalent to
while True:
try:
variable = iterator.next()
except StopIteration:
break
else:
execute_code(variable)
Christopher King wrote:
Is there any syntax that uses the send method of an iterator?
No.
--
Steven
___
Tutor maillist - Tutor@python.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tutor
Ashish Gaonker wrote:
My obvious thinking is : Java being compiled language , must be faster then
a interpreted language.
There are three misunderstandings with that statement.
Firstly:
Languages are neither "compiled" or "interpreted". Languages are syntax
and grammar. Implementations ar
Wayne Werner wrote:
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 1:11 PM, wrote:
Is there any additional overhead of using the locals() or format(locals())
instead of a tuple? - the format option is a double function call so I would
expect that to be considerably slower
Using the following code and timeit, it a
19 matches
Mail list logo
