On 8/31/07, David Bear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I think I want to be lazy and express this
>
> if a == b | a = c
> (if a equal b or a equals c)
> using
>
> if a == b | c
>
> it seems to work.. but I'm not sure if it is correct -- and I haven't seen
> any documentation on using this type of sy
David Bear wrote:
> I think I want to be lazy and express this
>
> if a == b | a = c
> (if a equal b or a equals c)
> using
>
> if a == b | c
>
> it seems to work.. but I'm not sure if it is correct -- and I haven't seen
> any documentation on using this type of syntax.
>
>
>
The pipe is the "bi
That definitely won't work. How could the language possibly determine
if you meant
a == b | a == c
as opposed to the literal
a == b | c
What this becomes is
a == (b | c)
Also be aware that | is a "bitwise or" and not a logical "or" which may
not be what you want. So your original expressio
