On 07/27/2016 04:04 AM, Alan Gauld via Tutor wrote:
On 27/07/16 04:44, Jim Byrnes wrote:
OOP has always driven me crazy. I read the material and follow the
examples until I feel I understand them, but when I try to implement it
I end up with an error filled mess.
That suggests that its not th
On 07/27/2016 03:12 AM, Peter Otten wrote:
Jim Byrnes wrote:
OOP has always driven me crazy. I read the material and follow the
examples until I feel I understand them, but when I try to implement it
I end up with an error filled mess.
So I decided to give it another try. When I got to the c
On 07/26/2016 11:38 PM, Ben Finney wrote:
Jim Byrnes writes:
So I decided to give it another try. When I got to the chapter on
tkinter I decided to solve all the exercises using OOP even though the
book solutions did not use OOP.
Hmm, that sounds ill advised.
OOP is one tool among many; try
On 27/07/16 04:44, Jim Byrnes wrote:
> OOP has always driven me crazy. I read the material and follow the
> examples until I feel I understand them, but when I try to implement it
> I end up with an error filled mess.
That suggests that its not the OOP concept thats confusing
you but the langua
Jim Byrnes wrote:
> OOP has always driven me crazy. I read the material and follow the
> examples until I feel I understand them, but when I try to implement it
> I end up with an error filled mess.
>
> So I decided to give it another try. When I got to the chapter on
> tkinter I decided to sol
Jim Byrnes writes:
> So I decided to give it another try. When I got to the chapter on
> tkinter I decided to solve all the exercises using OOP even though the
> book solutions did not use OOP.
Hmm, that sounds ill advised.
OOP is one tool among many; trying to apply it where it's a poor fit
wi
