> So don't write:
> [adds.add_changes('foo', path) for path in filelist]
> but:
> for path in filelist: adds.add_changes('foo', path)
Excellent point; new toy, got carrid away :) I feel silly on that one.
And now that I've made the
return list.extend(foo)
mistake, I'll surely neve- ... er, wa
stv wrote:
> # return all changes, deletes first
> return dels.extend(adds)
>
> Since extend returns None, I ran into a lot of not-iterable errors
> when calling this code. So I fixed this with
>
> dels.extend(adds)
> return dels
>
> And all is good, although it took way more head scratc
On 3 Apr 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I had several list comprehensions that I was mucking with; these lists
> are working on a simple subclass of the built-in list object. They
> looked liked this:
>
> filelist = getFilesToAdd()
> filelist2 = getFilesToDel()
>
> adds = MyList('foo')
>
