Re: [Tutor] Another set question

2017-04-30 Thread Phil
On Sun, 30 Apr 2017 15:58:13 +0100 Alan Gauld via Tutor wrote: > I would probably combine both such that for each cell you > have a tuple containing the given number and the set of > candidates. In some cases the number may be a sentinel > (such as -1) to indicate no number yet, and for some > ce

Re: [Tutor] Another set question

2017-04-30 Thread Alan Gauld via Tutor
On 30/04/17 00:58, Phil wrote: > Thank you Ben. A rethink of the problem during the 20 hours since > I posted my most recent question has led to a solution. You don;t say what so i'll go with what you say below... > The strings are the given numbers while the sets are > the likely candidates.

Re: [Tutor] Another set question

2017-04-29 Thread Ben Finney
Phil writes: > It took me months to solve come up with a working solution in C++ > whereas I almost have a working solution in Python in a little over a > week. Welcome to Python, we're glad to hear of your success! -- \ “[Entrenched media corporations will] maintain the status quo, |

Re: [Tutor] Another set question

2017-04-29 Thread Phil
On Sat, 29 Apr 2017 20:27:17 +1000 Ben Finney wrote: > Why is the data in such a state that you can't decide how to use it > until you know whether it is a set versus a string? Can the data be > handled differently? We'll need to know what you're trying to achieve, > to answer properly. Thank yo

Re: [Tutor] Another set question

2017-04-29 Thread Ben Finney
Phil writes: > Thank you Ben and Martin for your detailed replies. I was debating > whether or not to post my question at all because it looked vague, > even to me. That's not the issue; the question was posed clearly enough. The problem is that your purpose is opaque, and we have a strong suspi

Re: [Tutor] Another set question

2017-04-29 Thread Phil
On Fri, 28 Apr 2017 19:42:36 -0700 "Martin A. Brown" wrote: > > Hello and greetings Phil, > > >> I'm trying to implement a conditional branch based on a variable > >> type. > > > >This is often (not always) a mistake, in Python. So the question > >needs to be asked: What makes you think that co

Re: [Tutor] Another set question

2017-04-28 Thread Martin A. Brown
Hello and greetings Phil, >> I'm trying to implement a conditional branch based on a variable type. > >This is often (not always) a mistake, in Python. So the question needs >to be asked: What makes you think that condition is a requirement? > >So, I suspect you will need to explain better what l

Re: [Tutor] Another set question

2017-04-28 Thread Ben Finney
Phil writes: > I'm trying to implement a conditional branch based on a variable type. This is often (not always) a mistake, in Python. So the question needs to be asked: What makes you think that condition is a requirement? In other words, why is the data such that you *need* to know whether it