On 12/22/2010 10:32 PM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
Karim, 22.12.2010 22:09:
Using lxml (except for the different import) will be fully compliant
with
the ET code.
Do I have to adapt it?
There are certain differences.
http://codespeak.net/lxml/compatibility.html
This page hasn't been changed for a
Karim, 22.12.2010 22:09:
Using lxml (except for the different import) will be fully compliant with
the ET code.
Do I have to adapt it?
There are certain differences.
http://codespeak.net/lxml/compatibility.html
This page hasn't been changed for ages, but it should still be mostly accurate.
Thanks Stefan for answering.
That's what I come up with.
Using lxml (except for the different import) will be fully compliant
with the ET code.
Do I have to adapt it?
I saw your fantastic benchmarks! Why the hell lxml is not integrated
into the stdlib.
I thought they put in it things which
Karim, 22.12.2010 19:28:
On 12/22/2010 07:07 PM, Karim wrote:
Is somebody has an example of the way to parse an xml file against a
"grammary" file.xsd.
I found this:
http://www.velocityreviews.com/forums/t695106-re-xml-parsing-with-python.html
Stefan is it still true the limitation of etree
On 12/22/2010 07:07 PM, Karim wrote:
Is somebody has an example of the way to parse an xml file against a
"grammary" file.xsd.
I found this:
http://www.velocityreviews.com/forums/t695106-re-xml-parsing-with-python.html
Stefan is it still true the limitation of etree in python 2.7.1 ?
Regar
Hello all,
Is somebody has an example of the way to parse an xml file against a
"grammary" file.xsd.
The default parser is checking closing tags and attributes but I would
like to validate a XSD
file.
I use the module ElementTree.
Regards
Karim
__
